Family-centered rounds on pediatric wards: A PRIS network survey of US and Canadian hospitalists

Vineeta S. Mittal, Ted Sigrest, Mary C. Ottolini, Daniel Rauch, Hua Lin, Brian Kit, Christopher P. Landrigan, Glenn Flores

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to examine pediatric hospitalist rounding practices and characteristics associated with programs conducting family-centered rounds (FCRs). METHODS: The Pediatric Hospitalist Triennial Survey, sent to a subset of pediatric hospitalists on the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings listserv from the United States and Canada, consisted of 63 questions on sociodemographic characteristics, training, practice characteristics, and rounding practices. RESULTS: Among 265 respondents (response rate: 70%), 78% practiced in academic hospitals and 22% in nonacademic hospitals. The prevalences of specific rounding categories were as follows: FCRs, 44%; sit-down, 24%; hallway, 21%; others, 11%. FCRs occurred significantly more often in academic (48%) than nonacademic (31%) hospitals (P = .04). FCRs can include pediatric residents, bedside nurses, charge nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and social workers. Academic settings and higher average daily patient censuses, but not FCRs, were significantly associated with prolonged rounding duration. The most commonly perceived FCR benefits included increased family involvement and understanding, trainee role modeling, and effective team communication. Physical constraints, trainees' apprehensions, and time were the main perceived FCR barriers. Greater perceived benefit/barrier ratios, FCR benefits, and family involvement in care were associated with a greater likelihood of conducting FCRs, whereas a greater number of perceived FCR barriers was associated with not conducting FCRs. CONCLUSIONS: FCRs were the most-common rounding category among respondents. FCRs were not associated with a self-reported increase in rounding duration. Successful FCR implementation may require educating staff members and trainees about FCR benefits and addressing FCR barriers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-43
Number of pages7
JournalPediatrics
Volume126
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010

Keywords

  • Bedside rounds
  • Hospitalization
  • Medical education
  • Patient-centered care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Family-centered rounds on pediatric wards: A PRIS network survey of US and Canadian hospitalists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Mittal, V. S., Sigrest, T., Ottolini, M. C., Rauch, D., Lin, H., Kit, B., Landrigan, C. P., & Flores, G. (2010). Family-centered rounds on pediatric wards: A PRIS network survey of US and Canadian hospitalists. Pediatrics, 126(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2364