Financial incentives for abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals in smoking cessation treatment

Darla E. Kendzor, Michael S. Businelle, Insiya B. Poonawalla, Erica L. Cuate, Anshula Kesh, Debra M. Rios, Ping Ma, David S. Balis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated the effectiveness of offering adjunctive financial incentives for abstinence (contingency management [CM]) within a safety net hospital smoking cessation program. Methods. We randomized participants (n = 146) from a Dallas County, Texas, Tobacco Cessation Clinic from 2011 to 2013 to usual care (UC; cessation program; n = 71) or CM (UC + 4 weeks of financial incentives; n = 75), and followed from 1 week before the quit date through 4 weeks after the quit date. A subset (n = 128) was asked to attend a visit 12 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Results. Participants were primarily Black (62.3%) or White (28.1%) and female (57.5%). Most participants were uninsured (52.1%) and had an annual household income of less than $12 000 (55.5%). Abstinence rates were significantly higher for those assigned to CM than UC at all visits following the quit date (all Ps <.05). Point prevalence abstinence rates in the CM and UC groups were 49.3% versus 25.4% at 4 weeks after the quit date and 32.8% versus 14.1% at 12 weeks after the quit date. CM participants earned an average of $63.40 ($150 possible) for abstinence during the first 4 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Conclusions. Offering small financial incentives for abstinence might be an effective means to improve abstinence rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals participating in smoking cessation treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1198-1205
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume105
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Withholding Treatment
Vulnerable Populations
Smoking Cessation
Motivation
Safety-net Providers
Tobacco Use Cessation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Financial incentives for abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals in smoking cessation treatment. / Kendzor, Darla E.; Businelle, Michael S.; Poonawalla, Insiya B.; Cuate, Erica L.; Kesh, Anshula; Rios, Debra M.; Ma, Ping; Balis, David S.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 105, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 1198-1205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kendzor, Darla E. ; Businelle, Michael S. ; Poonawalla, Insiya B. ; Cuate, Erica L. ; Kesh, Anshula ; Rios, Debra M. ; Ma, Ping ; Balis, David S. / Financial incentives for abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals in smoking cessation treatment. In: American Journal of Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 105, No. 6. pp. 1198-1205.
@article{1b880b93283a4deab1959527745b7ad9,
title = "Financial incentives for abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals in smoking cessation treatment",
abstract = "Objectives. We evaluated the effectiveness of offering adjunctive financial incentives for abstinence (contingency management [CM]) within a safety net hospital smoking cessation program. Methods. We randomized participants (n = 146) from a Dallas County, Texas, Tobacco Cessation Clinic from 2011 to 2013 to usual care (UC; cessation program; n = 71) or CM (UC + 4 weeks of financial incentives; n = 75), and followed from 1 week before the quit date through 4 weeks after the quit date. A subset (n = 128) was asked to attend a visit 12 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Results. Participants were primarily Black (62.3{\%}) or White (28.1{\%}) and female (57.5{\%}). Most participants were uninsured (52.1{\%}) and had an annual household income of less than $12 000 (55.5{\%}). Abstinence rates were significantly higher for those assigned to CM than UC at all visits following the quit date (all Ps <.05). Point prevalence abstinence rates in the CM and UC groups were 49.3{\%} versus 25.4{\%} at 4 weeks after the quit date and 32.8{\%} versus 14.1{\%} at 12 weeks after the quit date. CM participants earned an average of $63.40 ($150 possible) for abstinence during the first 4 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Conclusions. Offering small financial incentives for abstinence might be an effective means to improve abstinence rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals participating in smoking cessation treatment.",
author = "Kendzor, {Darla E.} and Businelle, {Michael S.} and Poonawalla, {Insiya B.} and Cuate, {Erica L.} and Anshula Kesh and Rios, {Debra M.} and Ping Ma and Balis, {David S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2014.302102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "1198--1205",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Financial incentives for abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals in smoking cessation treatment

AU - Kendzor, Darla E.

AU - Businelle, Michael S.

AU - Poonawalla, Insiya B.

AU - Cuate, Erica L.

AU - Kesh, Anshula

AU - Rios, Debra M.

AU - Ma, Ping

AU - Balis, David S.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Objectives. We evaluated the effectiveness of offering adjunctive financial incentives for abstinence (contingency management [CM]) within a safety net hospital smoking cessation program. Methods. We randomized participants (n = 146) from a Dallas County, Texas, Tobacco Cessation Clinic from 2011 to 2013 to usual care (UC; cessation program; n = 71) or CM (UC + 4 weeks of financial incentives; n = 75), and followed from 1 week before the quit date through 4 weeks after the quit date. A subset (n = 128) was asked to attend a visit 12 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Results. Participants were primarily Black (62.3%) or White (28.1%) and female (57.5%). Most participants were uninsured (52.1%) and had an annual household income of less than $12 000 (55.5%). Abstinence rates were significantly higher for those assigned to CM than UC at all visits following the quit date (all Ps <.05). Point prevalence abstinence rates in the CM and UC groups were 49.3% versus 25.4% at 4 weeks after the quit date and 32.8% versus 14.1% at 12 weeks after the quit date. CM participants earned an average of $63.40 ($150 possible) for abstinence during the first 4 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Conclusions. Offering small financial incentives for abstinence might be an effective means to improve abstinence rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals participating in smoking cessation treatment.

AB - Objectives. We evaluated the effectiveness of offering adjunctive financial incentives for abstinence (contingency management [CM]) within a safety net hospital smoking cessation program. Methods. We randomized participants (n = 146) from a Dallas County, Texas, Tobacco Cessation Clinic from 2011 to 2013 to usual care (UC; cessation program; n = 71) or CM (UC + 4 weeks of financial incentives; n = 75), and followed from 1 week before the quit date through 4 weeks after the quit date. A subset (n = 128) was asked to attend a visit 12 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Results. Participants were primarily Black (62.3%) or White (28.1%) and female (57.5%). Most participants were uninsured (52.1%) and had an annual household income of less than $12 000 (55.5%). Abstinence rates were significantly higher for those assigned to CM than UC at all visits following the quit date (all Ps <.05). Point prevalence abstinence rates in the CM and UC groups were 49.3% versus 25.4% at 4 weeks after the quit date and 32.8% versus 14.1% at 12 weeks after the quit date. CM participants earned an average of $63.40 ($150 possible) for abstinence during the first 4 weeks after the scheduled quit date. Conclusions. Offering small financial incentives for abstinence might be an effective means to improve abstinence rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals participating in smoking cessation treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929353346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929353346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302102

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302102

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 1198

EP - 1205

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 6

ER -