Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America

Christoph U. Lehmann, Adi V. Gundlapalli, Jeffrey J. Williamson, Douglas B. Fridsma, William R. Hersh, Marie Krousel-Wood, Christopher J. Ondrula, Benson Munger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:  To review the highlights of the new Clinical Informatics subspecialty including its history, certification requirements, development of and performance on the certification examination in the United States.

METHODS:  We reviewed processes for the development of a subspecialty. Data from board certification examinations were collated and analyzed. We discussed eligibility requirements in the fellowship as well as practice pathways.

RESULTS:  Lessons learned from the development of the Clinical Informatics subspecialty, opportunities, challenges, and future directions for the field are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS:  There remains a need for fellowship programs and creation and maintenance of a professional home for the subspecialty with the American Medical Informatics Association. Ongoing attention to the currency of the core content is required to maintain an examination designed to test the key concepts within the field of Clinical Informatics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-242
Number of pages6
JournalYearbook of medical informatics
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Informatics
Certification
Physicians
American Medical Association
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Lehmann, C. U., Gundlapalli, A. V., Williamson, J. J., Fridsma, D. B., Hersh, W. R., Krousel-Wood, M., ... Munger, B. (2018). Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America. Yearbook of medical informatics, 27(1), 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641198

Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America. / Lehmann, Christoph U.; Gundlapalli, Adi V.; Williamson, Jeffrey J.; Fridsma, Douglas B.; Hersh, William R.; Krousel-Wood, Marie; Ondrula, Christopher J.; Munger, Benson.

In: Yearbook of medical informatics, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.08.2018, p. 237-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lehmann, CU, Gundlapalli, AV, Williamson, JJ, Fridsma, DB, Hersh, WR, Krousel-Wood, M, Ondrula, CJ & Munger, B 2018, 'Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America', Yearbook of medical informatics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641198
Lehmann, Christoph U. ; Gundlapalli, Adi V. ; Williamson, Jeffrey J. ; Fridsma, Douglas B. ; Hersh, William R. ; Krousel-Wood, Marie ; Ondrula, Christopher J. ; Munger, Benson. / Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America. In: Yearbook of medical informatics. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 237-242.
@article{84499e6beea4450dadebd4649cdc253a,
title = "Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:  To review the highlights of the new Clinical Informatics subspecialty including its history, certification requirements, development of and performance on the certification examination in the United States.METHODS:  We reviewed processes for the development of a subspecialty. Data from board certification examinations were collated and analyzed. We discussed eligibility requirements in the fellowship as well as practice pathways.RESULTS:  Lessons learned from the development of the Clinical Informatics subspecialty, opportunities, challenges, and future directions for the field are discussed.CONCLUSIONS:  There remains a need for fellowship programs and creation and maintenance of a professional home for the subspecialty with the American Medical Informatics Association. Ongoing attention to the currency of the core content is required to maintain an examination designed to test the key concepts within the field of Clinical Informatics.",
author = "Lehmann, {Christoph U.} and Gundlapalli, {Adi V.} and Williamson, {Jeffrey J.} and Fridsma, {Douglas B.} and Hersh, {William R.} and Marie Krousel-Wood and Ondrula, {Christopher J.} and Benson Munger",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0038-1641198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "237--242",
journal = "Yearbook of medical informatics",
issn = "0943-4747",
publisher = "International Medical Informatics Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America

AU - Lehmann, Christoph U.

AU - Gundlapalli, Adi V.

AU - Williamson, Jeffrey J.

AU - Fridsma, Douglas B.

AU - Hersh, William R.

AU - Krousel-Wood, Marie

AU - Ondrula, Christopher J.

AU - Munger, Benson

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES:  To review the highlights of the new Clinical Informatics subspecialty including its history, certification requirements, development of and performance on the certification examination in the United States.METHODS:  We reviewed processes for the development of a subspecialty. Data from board certification examinations were collated and analyzed. We discussed eligibility requirements in the fellowship as well as practice pathways.RESULTS:  Lessons learned from the development of the Clinical Informatics subspecialty, opportunities, challenges, and future directions for the field are discussed.CONCLUSIONS:  There remains a need for fellowship programs and creation and maintenance of a professional home for the subspecialty with the American Medical Informatics Association. Ongoing attention to the currency of the core content is required to maintain an examination designed to test the key concepts within the field of Clinical Informatics.

AB - OBJECTIVES:  To review the highlights of the new Clinical Informatics subspecialty including its history, certification requirements, development of and performance on the certification examination in the United States.METHODS:  We reviewed processes for the development of a subspecialty. Data from board certification examinations were collated and analyzed. We discussed eligibility requirements in the fellowship as well as practice pathways.RESULTS:  Lessons learned from the development of the Clinical Informatics subspecialty, opportunities, challenges, and future directions for the field are discussed.CONCLUSIONS:  There remains a need for fellowship programs and creation and maintenance of a professional home for the subspecialty with the American Medical Informatics Association. Ongoing attention to the currency of the core content is required to maintain an examination designed to test the key concepts within the field of Clinical Informatics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052995362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052995362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1641198

DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1641198

M3 - Article

C2 - 29681038

AN - SCOPUS:85052995362

VL - 27

SP - 237

EP - 242

JO - Yearbook of medical informatics

JF - Yearbook of medical informatics

SN - 0943-4747

IS - 1

ER -