Fracture Risk Through Oblique External Fixator Pin Tracks

Shawn M. Gee, William A. Pierce, Karen D. Standefer, Robert G. Thompson, Mikhail Samchukov, Alexander M Cherkashin, Christopher A. Iobst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A known complication following removal of an external fixator is fracture through a pin track. Certain advantages are granted by inserting external fixator half-pins at oblique (not orthogonal) angles, such as increased pull-out strength and increased stability against torsional strain with divergent half-pins. We sought to determine if oblique pin tracks also had protective properties against secondary fracture through the pin track after half-pin removal. Acrylic plastic tubing was used to evaluate the effects of pin track obliquity on load to failure after drilling pin tracks. Tubing of 5/8″ outside diameter with 3/8″ inside diameter was chosen to simulate a clinical representation of an adult femur. Torsional, anterior-posterior (A-P) 4-point bending, and medial-lateral (M-L) 4-point bending loads were applied to 12″ specimens with a 6 mm hole drilled mid-shaft at either 0, 10, 20, or 30 degrees. In the A-P 4-point bending model, the drill hole was oriented in the direction of the applied force. In the M-L bending model, the drill hole was oriented perpendicular to the applied force. With increasing half-pin obliquity, less force was needed to produce a fracture through the drilled pin track with torsional stress (13.0 Nm for 0 degrees, 10.6 Nm for 30 degrees, P=0.004). There was no significant difference in the amount A-P and M-L force needed to cause failure. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure compared with the A-P pin trajectory. Highest load to failure was demonstrated in the 0 degree M-L sample. A statistically significant reduction in force was required to cause fracture with increased pin obliquity. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure than the A-P pin trajectory. Increased pin obliquity may lead to higher risk of fracture after half-pin removal. Placing a half-pin at 0 degree, orthogonal to the direction of highest physiological force, is likely to reduce the risk of fracture after half-pin removal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTechniques in Orthopaedics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

External Fixators
Femur
Plastics
Direction compound

Keywords

  • external fixation
  • fracture
  • half pin
  • oblique pins
  • pin track

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Gee, S. M., Pierce, W. A., Standefer, K. D., Thompson, R. G., Samchukov, M., Cherkashin, A. M., & Iobst, C. A. (Accepted/In press). Fracture Risk Through Oblique External Fixator Pin Tracks. Techniques in Orthopaedics. https://doi.org/10.1097/BTO.0000000000000353

Fracture Risk Through Oblique External Fixator Pin Tracks. / Gee, Shawn M.; Pierce, William A.; Standefer, Karen D.; Thompson, Robert G.; Samchukov, Mikhail; Cherkashin, Alexander M; Iobst, Christopher A.

In: Techniques in Orthopaedics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gee, Shawn M. ; Pierce, William A. ; Standefer, Karen D. ; Thompson, Robert G. ; Samchukov, Mikhail ; Cherkashin, Alexander M ; Iobst, Christopher A. / Fracture Risk Through Oblique External Fixator Pin Tracks. In: Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2018.
@article{ee73d204a38e4691a598bc9da176a5f6,
title = "Fracture Risk Through Oblique External Fixator Pin Tracks",
abstract = "A known complication following removal of an external fixator is fracture through a pin track. Certain advantages are granted by inserting external fixator half-pins at oblique (not orthogonal) angles, such as increased pull-out strength and increased stability against torsional strain with divergent half-pins. We sought to determine if oblique pin tracks also had protective properties against secondary fracture through the pin track after half-pin removal. Acrylic plastic tubing was used to evaluate the effects of pin track obliquity on load to failure after drilling pin tracks. Tubing of 5/8″ outside diameter with 3/8″ inside diameter was chosen to simulate a clinical representation of an adult femur. Torsional, anterior-posterior (A-P) 4-point bending, and medial-lateral (M-L) 4-point bending loads were applied to 12″ specimens with a 6 mm hole drilled mid-shaft at either 0, 10, 20, or 30 degrees. In the A-P 4-point bending model, the drill hole was oriented in the direction of the applied force. In the M-L bending model, the drill hole was oriented perpendicular to the applied force. With increasing half-pin obliquity, less force was needed to produce a fracture through the drilled pin track with torsional stress (13.0 Nm for 0 degrees, 10.6 Nm for 30 degrees, P=0.004). There was no significant difference in the amount A-P and M-L force needed to cause failure. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure compared with the A-P pin trajectory. Highest load to failure was demonstrated in the 0 degree M-L sample. A statistically significant reduction in force was required to cause fracture with increased pin obliquity. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure than the A-P pin trajectory. Increased pin obliquity may lead to higher risk of fracture after half-pin removal. Placing a half-pin at 0 degree, orthogonal to the direction of highest physiological force, is likely to reduce the risk of fracture after half-pin removal.",
keywords = "external fixation, fracture, half pin, oblique pins, pin track",
author = "Gee, {Shawn M.} and Pierce, {William A.} and Standefer, {Karen D.} and Thompson, {Robert G.} and Mikhail Samchukov and Cherkashin, {Alexander M} and Iobst, {Christopher A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BTO.0000000000000353",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Techniques in Orthopaedics",
issn = "0885-9698",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fracture Risk Through Oblique External Fixator Pin Tracks

AU - Gee, Shawn M.

AU - Pierce, William A.

AU - Standefer, Karen D.

AU - Thompson, Robert G.

AU - Samchukov, Mikhail

AU - Cherkashin, Alexander M

AU - Iobst, Christopher A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - A known complication following removal of an external fixator is fracture through a pin track. Certain advantages are granted by inserting external fixator half-pins at oblique (not orthogonal) angles, such as increased pull-out strength and increased stability against torsional strain with divergent half-pins. We sought to determine if oblique pin tracks also had protective properties against secondary fracture through the pin track after half-pin removal. Acrylic plastic tubing was used to evaluate the effects of pin track obliquity on load to failure after drilling pin tracks. Tubing of 5/8″ outside diameter with 3/8″ inside diameter was chosen to simulate a clinical representation of an adult femur. Torsional, anterior-posterior (A-P) 4-point bending, and medial-lateral (M-L) 4-point bending loads were applied to 12″ specimens with a 6 mm hole drilled mid-shaft at either 0, 10, 20, or 30 degrees. In the A-P 4-point bending model, the drill hole was oriented in the direction of the applied force. In the M-L bending model, the drill hole was oriented perpendicular to the applied force. With increasing half-pin obliquity, less force was needed to produce a fracture through the drilled pin track with torsional stress (13.0 Nm for 0 degrees, 10.6 Nm for 30 degrees, P=0.004). There was no significant difference in the amount A-P and M-L force needed to cause failure. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure compared with the A-P pin trajectory. Highest load to failure was demonstrated in the 0 degree M-L sample. A statistically significant reduction in force was required to cause fracture with increased pin obliquity. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure than the A-P pin trajectory. Increased pin obliquity may lead to higher risk of fracture after half-pin removal. Placing a half-pin at 0 degree, orthogonal to the direction of highest physiological force, is likely to reduce the risk of fracture after half-pin removal.

AB - A known complication following removal of an external fixator is fracture through a pin track. Certain advantages are granted by inserting external fixator half-pins at oblique (not orthogonal) angles, such as increased pull-out strength and increased stability against torsional strain with divergent half-pins. We sought to determine if oblique pin tracks also had protective properties against secondary fracture through the pin track after half-pin removal. Acrylic plastic tubing was used to evaluate the effects of pin track obliquity on load to failure after drilling pin tracks. Tubing of 5/8″ outside diameter with 3/8″ inside diameter was chosen to simulate a clinical representation of an adult femur. Torsional, anterior-posterior (A-P) 4-point bending, and medial-lateral (M-L) 4-point bending loads were applied to 12″ specimens with a 6 mm hole drilled mid-shaft at either 0, 10, 20, or 30 degrees. In the A-P 4-point bending model, the drill hole was oriented in the direction of the applied force. In the M-L bending model, the drill hole was oriented perpendicular to the applied force. With increasing half-pin obliquity, less force was needed to produce a fracture through the drilled pin track with torsional stress (13.0 Nm for 0 degrees, 10.6 Nm for 30 degrees, P=0.004). There was no significant difference in the amount A-P and M-L force needed to cause failure. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure compared with the A-P pin trajectory. Highest load to failure was demonstrated in the 0 degree M-L sample. A statistically significant reduction in force was required to cause fracture with increased pin obliquity. The M-L pin trajectory demonstrated higher load to failure than the A-P pin trajectory. Increased pin obliquity may lead to higher risk of fracture after half-pin removal. Placing a half-pin at 0 degree, orthogonal to the direction of highest physiological force, is likely to reduce the risk of fracture after half-pin removal.

KW - external fixation

KW - fracture

KW - half pin

KW - oblique pins

KW - pin track

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059306309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059306309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BTO.0000000000000353

DO - 10.1097/BTO.0000000000000353

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059306309

JO - Techniques in Orthopaedics

JF - Techniques in Orthopaedics

SN - 0885-9698

ER -