Genetic modification of the vessel wall: Comparison of surgical and catheter-based techniques for delivery of recombinant adenovirus

John E. Willard, Charles Landau, D. Brent Glamann, Dennis K Burns, Michael E Jessen, Mark J. Pirwitz, Robert D. Gerard, Robert S. Meidell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Gene transfer can potentially alter vessel wall biology and intervene in the pathogenesis of human disease. Although several methods for vector delivery have been described, systematic comparisons of these methods are unavailable. Therefore, this study compared three catheter-based strategies and a surgical technique to assess efficient and selective gene transfer to the vascular wall. Methods and Results: The common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins of New Zealand White rabbits were infected with recombinant adenovirus encoding either firefly luciferase or a nuclear-localizing variant of β-galactosidase. Delivery of recombinant virus was achieved by one of four methods: (1) instillation within a surgically isolated vessel segment (dwell), (2) a double-balloon catheter, (3) a perforated balloon catheter (Wolinsky), or (4) an angioplasty balloon catheter coated with a hydrophilic adsorbent polymer (Hydrogel). Vessel segments were analyzed 4 days after infection for luciferase and β- galactosidase activity and for the extent of injury to the vessel wall. Luciferase activity in vessels infected using the double-balloon method was substantially greater than that achieved by catheter-based methods (P<.05). The dwell and double-balloon methods yielded selective expression in intimal cells, whereas arteries infected using perforated or Hydrogel-coated balloon catheters demonstrated expression primarily in medial cells. Tissue injury was most pronounced with the perforated balloon catheter. Conclusions: Prototype catheters permit relatively efficient direct gene transfer to vascular endothelium; however, delivery methods for targeting the medial cells are inefficient. Modifications are needed to optimize direct gene transfer and minimize tissue injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2190-2197
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation
Volume89
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1994

Fingerprint

Adenoviridae
Catheters
Galactosidases
Hydrogel
Luciferases
Genes
Wounds and Injuries
Tunica Intima
Firefly Luciferases
Balloon Angioplasty
Common Carotid Artery
Jugular Veins
Vascular Endothelium
Blood Vessels
Polymers
Arteries
Rabbits
Viruses
Infection

Keywords

  • catheters
  • endothelium
  • gene therapy
  • gene transfer
  • vessel wall

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Genetic modification of the vessel wall : Comparison of surgical and catheter-based techniques for delivery of recombinant adenovirus. / Willard, John E.; Landau, Charles; Glamann, D. Brent; Burns, Dennis K; Jessen, Michael E; Pirwitz, Mark J.; Gerard, Robert D.; Meidell, Robert S.

In: Circulation, Vol. 89, No. 5, 05.1994, p. 2190-2197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Willard, JE, Landau, C, Glamann, DB, Burns, DK, Jessen, ME, Pirwitz, MJ, Gerard, RD & Meidell, RS 1994, 'Genetic modification of the vessel wall: Comparison of surgical and catheter-based techniques for delivery of recombinant adenovirus', Circulation, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 2190-2197.
Willard, John E. ; Landau, Charles ; Glamann, D. Brent ; Burns, Dennis K ; Jessen, Michael E ; Pirwitz, Mark J. ; Gerard, Robert D. ; Meidell, Robert S. / Genetic modification of the vessel wall : Comparison of surgical and catheter-based techniques for delivery of recombinant adenovirus. In: Circulation. 1994 ; Vol. 89, No. 5. pp. 2190-2197.
@article{8d41209d52814100980fae4dcd8e00d3,
title = "Genetic modification of the vessel wall: Comparison of surgical and catheter-based techniques for delivery of recombinant adenovirus",
abstract = "Background: Gene transfer can potentially alter vessel wall biology and intervene in the pathogenesis of human disease. Although several methods for vector delivery have been described, systematic comparisons of these methods are unavailable. Therefore, this study compared three catheter-based strategies and a surgical technique to assess efficient and selective gene transfer to the vascular wall. Methods and Results: The common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins of New Zealand White rabbits were infected with recombinant adenovirus encoding either firefly luciferase or a nuclear-localizing variant of β-galactosidase. Delivery of recombinant virus was achieved by one of four methods: (1) instillation within a surgically isolated vessel segment (dwell), (2) a double-balloon catheter, (3) a perforated balloon catheter (Wolinsky), or (4) an angioplasty balloon catheter coated with a hydrophilic adsorbent polymer (Hydrogel). Vessel segments were analyzed 4 days after infection for luciferase and β- galactosidase activity and for the extent of injury to the vessel wall. Luciferase activity in vessels infected using the double-balloon method was substantially greater than that achieved by catheter-based methods (P<.05). The dwell and double-balloon methods yielded selective expression in intimal cells, whereas arteries infected using perforated or Hydrogel-coated balloon catheters demonstrated expression primarily in medial cells. Tissue injury was most pronounced with the perforated balloon catheter. Conclusions: Prototype catheters permit relatively efficient direct gene transfer to vascular endothelium; however, delivery methods for targeting the medial cells are inefficient. Modifications are needed to optimize direct gene transfer and minimize tissue injury.",
keywords = "catheters, endothelium, gene therapy, gene transfer, vessel wall",
author = "Willard, {John E.} and Charles Landau and Glamann, {D. Brent} and Burns, {Dennis K} and Jessen, {Michael E} and Pirwitz, {Mark J.} and Gerard, {Robert D.} and Meidell, {Robert S.}",
year = "1994",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "2190--2197",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic modification of the vessel wall

T2 - Comparison of surgical and catheter-based techniques for delivery of recombinant adenovirus

AU - Willard, John E.

AU - Landau, Charles

AU - Glamann, D. Brent

AU - Burns, Dennis K

AU - Jessen, Michael E

AU - Pirwitz, Mark J.

AU - Gerard, Robert D.

AU - Meidell, Robert S.

PY - 1994/5

Y1 - 1994/5

N2 - Background: Gene transfer can potentially alter vessel wall biology and intervene in the pathogenesis of human disease. Although several methods for vector delivery have been described, systematic comparisons of these methods are unavailable. Therefore, this study compared three catheter-based strategies and a surgical technique to assess efficient and selective gene transfer to the vascular wall. Methods and Results: The common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins of New Zealand White rabbits were infected with recombinant adenovirus encoding either firefly luciferase or a nuclear-localizing variant of β-galactosidase. Delivery of recombinant virus was achieved by one of four methods: (1) instillation within a surgically isolated vessel segment (dwell), (2) a double-balloon catheter, (3) a perforated balloon catheter (Wolinsky), or (4) an angioplasty balloon catheter coated with a hydrophilic adsorbent polymer (Hydrogel). Vessel segments were analyzed 4 days after infection for luciferase and β- galactosidase activity and for the extent of injury to the vessel wall. Luciferase activity in vessels infected using the double-balloon method was substantially greater than that achieved by catheter-based methods (P<.05). The dwell and double-balloon methods yielded selective expression in intimal cells, whereas arteries infected using perforated or Hydrogel-coated balloon catheters demonstrated expression primarily in medial cells. Tissue injury was most pronounced with the perforated balloon catheter. Conclusions: Prototype catheters permit relatively efficient direct gene transfer to vascular endothelium; however, delivery methods for targeting the medial cells are inefficient. Modifications are needed to optimize direct gene transfer and minimize tissue injury.

AB - Background: Gene transfer can potentially alter vessel wall biology and intervene in the pathogenesis of human disease. Although several methods for vector delivery have been described, systematic comparisons of these methods are unavailable. Therefore, this study compared three catheter-based strategies and a surgical technique to assess efficient and selective gene transfer to the vascular wall. Methods and Results: The common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins of New Zealand White rabbits were infected with recombinant adenovirus encoding either firefly luciferase or a nuclear-localizing variant of β-galactosidase. Delivery of recombinant virus was achieved by one of four methods: (1) instillation within a surgically isolated vessel segment (dwell), (2) a double-balloon catheter, (3) a perforated balloon catheter (Wolinsky), or (4) an angioplasty balloon catheter coated with a hydrophilic adsorbent polymer (Hydrogel). Vessel segments were analyzed 4 days after infection for luciferase and β- galactosidase activity and for the extent of injury to the vessel wall. Luciferase activity in vessels infected using the double-balloon method was substantially greater than that achieved by catheter-based methods (P<.05). The dwell and double-balloon methods yielded selective expression in intimal cells, whereas arteries infected using perforated or Hydrogel-coated balloon catheters demonstrated expression primarily in medial cells. Tissue injury was most pronounced with the perforated balloon catheter. Conclusions: Prototype catheters permit relatively efficient direct gene transfer to vascular endothelium; however, delivery methods for targeting the medial cells are inefficient. Modifications are needed to optimize direct gene transfer and minimize tissue injury.

KW - catheters

KW - endothelium

KW - gene therapy

KW - gene transfer

KW - vessel wall

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028267856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028267856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8181144

AN - SCOPUS:0028267856

VL - 89

SP - 2190

EP - 2197

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 5

ER -