How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI: The expanded hybrid approach

James Sapontis, Steven P. Marso, William L. Lombardi, J. Aaron Grantham

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

There remains a pressing need in the interventional cardiology community to narrow the existing gap in the success rates, safety, and effi ciency of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) relative to non CTO-PCI. Success rates for non CTOPCI are high (>98 %). The success rates of CTO-PCI at experienced CTO-PCI centers are catching up (>90 %) but are likely much lower (50-70 %) at the vast majority of other PCI centers. Complication rates appear to be equal between CTO and non-CTO procedures at experienced CTO centers but may not be at others. CTO-PCI is associated with higher procedural time, contrast use, radiation exposure and supply cost than non CTO PCI even at experienced CTO-PCI centers. Thus, a wide variability in the CTO-PCI cases being attempted persists in large part due to these gaps. This chapter provides an overview of the new expanded hybrid approach, commonly employed by successful CTO operators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPercutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion
Subtitle of host publicationThe Hybrid Approach
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages141-159
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9783319215631
ISBN (Print)9783319215624
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Cardiology
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Antegrade dissection reentry (ADR)
  • CTO cap
  • Dissection reentry (DR)
  • Guidewire escalation
  • Hybrid approach to CTO-PCI
  • Retrograde cap
  • Subintimal TRAnscatheter Withdrawal (STRAW) technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sapontis, J., Marso, S. P., Lombardi, W. L., & Aaron Grantham, J. (2016). How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI: The expanded hybrid approach. In Percutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: The Hybrid Approach (pp. 141-159). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21563-1_11

How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI : The expanded hybrid approach. / Sapontis, James; Marso, Steven P.; Lombardi, William L.; Aaron Grantham, J.

Percutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: The Hybrid Approach. Springer International Publishing, 2016. p. 141-159.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Sapontis, J, Marso, SP, Lombardi, WL & Aaron Grantham, J 2016, How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI: The expanded hybrid approach. in Percutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: The Hybrid Approach. Springer International Publishing, pp. 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21563-1_11
Sapontis J, Marso SP, Lombardi WL, Aaron Grantham J. How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI: The expanded hybrid approach. In Percutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: The Hybrid Approach. Springer International Publishing. 2016. p. 141-159 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21563-1_11
Sapontis, James ; Marso, Steven P. ; Lombardi, William L. ; Aaron Grantham, J. / How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI : The expanded hybrid approach. Percutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: The Hybrid Approach. Springer International Publishing, 2016. pp. 141-159
@inbook{b408011f5afa4157ac739624910327d5,
title = "How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI: The expanded hybrid approach",
abstract = "There remains a pressing need in the interventional cardiology community to narrow the existing gap in the success rates, safety, and effi ciency of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) relative to non CTO-PCI. Success rates for non CTOPCI are high (>98 {\%}). The success rates of CTO-PCI at experienced CTO-PCI centers are catching up (>90 {\%}) but are likely much lower (50-70 {\%}) at the vast majority of other PCI centers. Complication rates appear to be equal between CTO and non-CTO procedures at experienced CTO centers but may not be at others. CTO-PCI is associated with higher procedural time, contrast use, radiation exposure and supply cost than non CTO PCI even at experienced CTO-PCI centers. Thus, a wide variability in the CTO-PCI cases being attempted persists in large part due to these gaps. This chapter provides an overview of the new expanded hybrid approach, commonly employed by successful CTO operators.",
keywords = "Antegrade dissection reentry (ADR), CTO cap, Dissection reentry (DR), Guidewire escalation, Hybrid approach to CTO-PCI, Retrograde cap, Subintimal TRAnscatheter Withdrawal (STRAW) technique",
author = "James Sapontis and Marso, {Steven P.} and Lombardi, {William L.} and {Aaron Grantham}, J.",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-21563-1_11",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319215624",
pages = "141--159",
booktitle = "Percutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - How to fix common problems encountered in CTO PCI

T2 - The expanded hybrid approach

AU - Sapontis, James

AU - Marso, Steven P.

AU - Lombardi, William L.

AU - Aaron Grantham, J.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - There remains a pressing need in the interventional cardiology community to narrow the existing gap in the success rates, safety, and effi ciency of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) relative to non CTO-PCI. Success rates for non CTOPCI are high (>98 %). The success rates of CTO-PCI at experienced CTO-PCI centers are catching up (>90 %) but are likely much lower (50-70 %) at the vast majority of other PCI centers. Complication rates appear to be equal between CTO and non-CTO procedures at experienced CTO centers but may not be at others. CTO-PCI is associated with higher procedural time, contrast use, radiation exposure and supply cost than non CTO PCI even at experienced CTO-PCI centers. Thus, a wide variability in the CTO-PCI cases being attempted persists in large part due to these gaps. This chapter provides an overview of the new expanded hybrid approach, commonly employed by successful CTO operators.

AB - There remains a pressing need in the interventional cardiology community to narrow the existing gap in the success rates, safety, and effi ciency of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) relative to non CTO-PCI. Success rates for non CTOPCI are high (>98 %). The success rates of CTO-PCI at experienced CTO-PCI centers are catching up (>90 %) but are likely much lower (50-70 %) at the vast majority of other PCI centers. Complication rates appear to be equal between CTO and non-CTO procedures at experienced CTO centers but may not be at others. CTO-PCI is associated with higher procedural time, contrast use, radiation exposure and supply cost than non CTO PCI even at experienced CTO-PCI centers. Thus, a wide variability in the CTO-PCI cases being attempted persists in large part due to these gaps. This chapter provides an overview of the new expanded hybrid approach, commonly employed by successful CTO operators.

KW - Antegrade dissection reentry (ADR)

KW - CTO cap

KW - Dissection reentry (DR)

KW - Guidewire escalation

KW - Hybrid approach to CTO-PCI

KW - Retrograde cap

KW - Subintimal TRAnscatheter Withdrawal (STRAW) technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030101178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030101178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-21563-1_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-21563-1_11

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85030101178

SN - 9783319215624

SP - 141

EP - 159

BT - Percutaneous Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -