TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of crossing strategy on midterm outcomes following percutaneous revascularisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
AU - Azzalini, Lorenzo
AU - Dautov, Rustem
AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
AU - Ojeda, Soledad
AU - Benincasa, Susanna
AU - Bellini, Barbara
AU - Karatasakis, Aris
AU - Chavarría, Jorge
AU - Rangan, Bavana V.
AU - Pan, Manuel
AU - Carlino, Mauro
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Rinfret, Stéphane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Europa Digital & Publishing 2017. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Aims: The aim of the present study was to compare the midterm clinical outcomes of patients undergoing successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to the crossing technique used, in a large multicentre registry. Methods and results: We compiled a multicentre registry of consecutive patients undergoing successful CTO PCI. Patients were divided into three groups: true-to-true (TTT) approach, modern dissection/re-entry (DR) techniques (CrossBoss/Stingray, reverse CART), and old DR techniques (LAST, STAR, CART). Cox regression was used to identify independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation). We included 924 patients (TTT, n=571; modern DR, n=258; old DR, n=95). Patients in both DR groups had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, angiographic and procedural complexity. The 12-month MACE rate was higher in old DR (22.1%) than in modern DR (8.9%) and TTT (9.1%, p<0.001). Old (hazard ratio [HR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12 to 3.61, p=0.02) but not modern (HR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.79, p=0.96) DR techniques were associated with a higher adjusted risk of MACE compared to TTT. Conclusions: The use of old but not modern DR techniques was associated with a higher risk of MACE. Therefore, CrossBoss/Stingray and reverse CART might be considered as first-line strategies for antegrade and retrograde DR-based CTO PCI, respectively.
AB - Aims: The aim of the present study was to compare the midterm clinical outcomes of patients undergoing successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to the crossing technique used, in a large multicentre registry. Methods and results: We compiled a multicentre registry of consecutive patients undergoing successful CTO PCI. Patients were divided into three groups: true-to-true (TTT) approach, modern dissection/re-entry (DR) techniques (CrossBoss/Stingray, reverse CART), and old DR techniques (LAST, STAR, CART). Cox regression was used to identify independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation). We included 924 patients (TTT, n=571; modern DR, n=258; old DR, n=95). Patients in both DR groups had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, angiographic and procedural complexity. The 12-month MACE rate was higher in old DR (22.1%) than in modern DR (8.9%) and TTT (9.1%, p<0.001). Old (hazard ratio [HR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12 to 3.61, p=0.02) but not modern (HR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.79, p=0.96) DR techniques were associated with a higher adjusted risk of MACE compared to TTT. Conclusions: The use of old but not modern DR techniques was associated with a higher risk of MACE. Therefore, CrossBoss/Stingray and reverse CART might be considered as first-line strategies for antegrade and retrograde DR-based CTO PCI, respectively.
KW - Chronic coronary total occlusion
KW - Clinical research
KW - Other technique
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027548937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027548937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-01010
DO - 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-01010
M3 - Article
C2 - 28242587
AN - SCOPUS:85027548937
SN - 1774-024X
VL - 13
SP - 978
EP - 985
JO - EuroIntervention
JF - EuroIntervention
IS - 8
ER -