TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved regional activity quantitation in nuclear medicine using a new approach to correct for tissue partial volume and spillover effects
AU - Moore, Stephen C.
AU - Southekal, Sudeepti
AU - Park, Mi Ae
AU - McQuaid, Sarah J.
AU - Kijewski, Marie Foley
AU - Muller, Stefan P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received July 09, 2011; revised September 16, 2011; accepted September 16, 2011. Date of publication September 29, 2011; date of current version February 03, 2012. This work was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health under Grant R01-EB001989 and Grant R01-EB 000802. Asterisk indicates corresponding author. *S. C. Moore is with the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA (e-mail: sc-moore@bwh.harvard.edu).
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - We have developed a new method of compensating for effects of partial volume and spillover in dual-modality imaging. The approach requires segmentation of just a few tissue types within a small volume-of-interest (VOI) surrounding a lesion; the algorithm estimates simultaneously, from projection data, the activity concentration within each segmented tissue inside the VOI. Measured emission projections were fitted to the sum of resolution-blurred projections of each such tissue, scaled by its unknown activity concentration, plus a global background contribution obtained by reprojection through the reconstructed image volume outside the VOI. The method was evaluated using multiple-pinhole \mu{\rm SPECT} data simulated for the MOBY mouse phantom containing two spherical lung tumors and one liver tumor, as well as using multiple-bead phantom data acquired on \mu{\rm SPECT} and \mu{\rm CT} scanners. Each VOI in the simulation study was 4.8 mm (12 voxels) cubed and, depending on location, contained up to four tissues (tumor, liver, heart, lung) with different values of relative ^{99{\rm m}}{\rm Tc} concentration. All tumor activity estimates achieved {<}{3\%} bias after {\sim}{15} ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) iterations (\times 10~{\hbox {subsets}}) , with better than 8% precision ({\leq}{25\%} greater than the Cramer-Rao lower bound). The projection-based fitting approach also outperformed three standardized uptake value (SUV)-like metrics, one of which was corrected for count spillover. In the bead phantom experiment, the mean {\pm} standard deviation of the bias of VOI estimates of bead concentration were 0.9\pm 9.5\%, comparable to those of a perturbation geometric transfer matrix (pGTM) approach ({-}{5.4}\pm 8.6\%); however, VOI estimates were more stable with increasing iteration number than pGTM estimates, even in the presence of substantial axial misalignment between \mu{\rm CT} and \mu{\rm SPECT} image volumes.
AB - We have developed a new method of compensating for effects of partial volume and spillover in dual-modality imaging. The approach requires segmentation of just a few tissue types within a small volume-of-interest (VOI) surrounding a lesion; the algorithm estimates simultaneously, from projection data, the activity concentration within each segmented tissue inside the VOI. Measured emission projections were fitted to the sum of resolution-blurred projections of each such tissue, scaled by its unknown activity concentration, plus a global background contribution obtained by reprojection through the reconstructed image volume outside the VOI. The method was evaluated using multiple-pinhole \mu{\rm SPECT} data simulated for the MOBY mouse phantom containing two spherical lung tumors and one liver tumor, as well as using multiple-bead phantom data acquired on \mu{\rm SPECT} and \mu{\rm CT} scanners. Each VOI in the simulation study was 4.8 mm (12 voxels) cubed and, depending on location, contained up to four tissues (tumor, liver, heart, lung) with different values of relative ^{99{\rm m}}{\rm Tc} concentration. All tumor activity estimates achieved {<}{3\%} bias after {\sim}{15} ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) iterations (\times 10~{\hbox {subsets}}) , with better than 8% precision ({\leq}{25\%} greater than the Cramer-Rao lower bound). The projection-based fitting approach also outperformed three standardized uptake value (SUV)-like metrics, one of which was corrected for count spillover. In the bead phantom experiment, the mean {\pm} standard deviation of the bias of VOI estimates of bead concentration were 0.9\pm 9.5\%, comparable to those of a perturbation geometric transfer matrix (pGTM) approach ({-}{5.4}\pm 8.6\%); however, VOI estimates were more stable with increasing iteration number than pGTM estimates, even in the presence of substantial axial misalignment between \mu{\rm CT} and \mu{\rm SPECT} image volumes.
KW - Ordered subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM)
KW - partial-volume effect
KW - positron emission tomography (PET)
KW - single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
KW - standardized uptake value (SUV)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856099857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856099857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMI.2011.2169981
DO - 10.1109/TMI.2011.2169981
M3 - Article
C2 - 21965196
AN - SCOPUS:84856099857
VL - 31
SP - 405
EP - 416
JO - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
JF - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
SN - 0278-0062
IS - 2
M1 - 6030947
ER -