Information assimilation and distribution challenges and goals for real and virtual journals

Irvin M. Modlin, Guido Adler, Kathey Alexander, Rudolf Arnold, David A. Brenner, Enrico Corazziari, Martin H. Floch, Ronald E. LaPorte, Walter L. Peterson, Eamonn M. Quigley, Michael D. Shapiro, Stuart J. Spechler, Robin C. Spiller, Guido N. Tytgat, Wolfram Wiegers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The distribution of biomedical information was transfigured over three centuries ago with the introduction of scientific journals. This enabled the widespread dissemination of data to global audiences and greatly facilitated not only the advance of science but amplified the interaction between investigators despite their different locations. This process continued to expand in a linear fashion prior to the emergence of the Internet. The latter system has prompted a phenomenal augmentation of information accessibility, and its everexpanding use has resulted in an exponential increase in the demand for digital technology and online resources. This technology has achieved unprecedented acceptance in the scientific domain and enabled publishers to expeditiously produce and distribute journal contents online. Such unparalleled access to information has sparked incendiary debate within the scientific community and among journal publishers in regard to numerous issues. It is thus much debated as to who has the right to "own" or control intellectual property, whether information should be made freely available to the online global community, how to gauge the legitimacy and authenticity of published research, and the need to reexamine the feasibility and profitability of paper journals in consideration of the digital, online formats that continue to gain popularity. To assess the current status of the situation, a meeting of journal editors, research scientists, and publishing executives was held in Constance, Germany, on June 26, 2004, to discuss these issues and formulate strategies and recommendations for the future of biomedical publishing. Herewith we provide a summation (manifesto) of the meeting's proceedings and provide a consensus opinion with the aim of illuminating the subject and also proposing some putative solutions for the major challenges that currently confront the scientific and publishing community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-188
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Information Dissemination
Intellectual Property
Technology
Illegitimacy
Access to Information
Research
Internet
Germany
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Impact factor
  • Open access
  • Peer-review
  • Publishing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Modlin, I. M., Adler, G., Alexander, K., Arnold, R., Brenner, D. A., Corazziari, E., ... Wiegers, W. (2005). Information assimilation and distribution challenges and goals for real and virtual journals. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 39(3), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mcg.0000152791.45765.32

Information assimilation and distribution challenges and goals for real and virtual journals. / Modlin, Irvin M.; Adler, Guido; Alexander, Kathey; Arnold, Rudolf; Brenner, David A.; Corazziari, Enrico; Floch, Martin H.; LaPorte, Ronald E.; Peterson, Walter L.; Quigley, Eamonn M.; Shapiro, Michael D.; Spechler, Stuart J.; Spiller, Robin C.; Tytgat, Guido N.; Wiegers, Wolfram.

In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Vol. 39, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 181-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Modlin, IM, Adler, G, Alexander, K, Arnold, R, Brenner, DA, Corazziari, E, Floch, MH, LaPorte, RE, Peterson, WL, Quigley, EM, Shapiro, MD, Spechler, SJ, Spiller, RC, Tytgat, GN & Wiegers, W 2005, 'Information assimilation and distribution challenges and goals for real and virtual journals', Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mcg.0000152791.45765.32
Modlin, Irvin M. ; Adler, Guido ; Alexander, Kathey ; Arnold, Rudolf ; Brenner, David A. ; Corazziari, Enrico ; Floch, Martin H. ; LaPorte, Ronald E. ; Peterson, Walter L. ; Quigley, Eamonn M. ; Shapiro, Michael D. ; Spechler, Stuart J. ; Spiller, Robin C. ; Tytgat, Guido N. ; Wiegers, Wolfram. / Information assimilation and distribution challenges and goals for real and virtual journals. In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2005 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 181-188.
@article{80f2477a832e40ba9f5356d59a3f6789,
title = "Information assimilation and distribution challenges and goals for real and virtual journals",
abstract = "The distribution of biomedical information was transfigured over three centuries ago with the introduction of scientific journals. This enabled the widespread dissemination of data to global audiences and greatly facilitated not only the advance of science but amplified the interaction between investigators despite their different locations. This process continued to expand in a linear fashion prior to the emergence of the Internet. The latter system has prompted a phenomenal augmentation of information accessibility, and its everexpanding use has resulted in an exponential increase in the demand for digital technology and online resources. This technology has achieved unprecedented acceptance in the scientific domain and enabled publishers to expeditiously produce and distribute journal contents online. Such unparalleled access to information has sparked incendiary debate within the scientific community and among journal publishers in regard to numerous issues. It is thus much debated as to who has the right to {"}own{"} or control intellectual property, whether information should be made freely available to the online global community, how to gauge the legitimacy and authenticity of published research, and the need to reexamine the feasibility and profitability of paper journals in consideration of the digital, online formats that continue to gain popularity. To assess the current status of the situation, a meeting of journal editors, research scientists, and publishing executives was held in Constance, Germany, on June 26, 2004, to discuss these issues and formulate strategies and recommendations for the future of biomedical publishing. Herewith we provide a summation (manifesto) of the meeting's proceedings and provide a consensus opinion with the aim of illuminating the subject and also proposing some putative solutions for the major challenges that currently confront the scientific and publishing community.",
keywords = "Impact factor, Open access, Peer-review, Publishing",
author = "Modlin, {Irvin M.} and Guido Adler and Kathey Alexander and Rudolf Arnold and Brenner, {David A.} and Enrico Corazziari and Floch, {Martin H.} and LaPorte, {Ronald E.} and Peterson, {Walter L.} and Quigley, {Eamonn M.} and Shapiro, {Michael D.} and Spechler, {Stuart J.} and Spiller, {Robin C.} and Tytgat, {Guido N.} and Wolfram Wiegers",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/01.mcg.0000152791.45765.32",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "181--188",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology",
issn = "0192-0790",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Information assimilation and distribution challenges and goals for real and virtual journals

AU - Modlin, Irvin M.

AU - Adler, Guido

AU - Alexander, Kathey

AU - Arnold, Rudolf

AU - Brenner, David A.

AU - Corazziari, Enrico

AU - Floch, Martin H.

AU - LaPorte, Ronald E.

AU - Peterson, Walter L.

AU - Quigley, Eamonn M.

AU - Shapiro, Michael D.

AU - Spechler, Stuart J.

AU - Spiller, Robin C.

AU - Tytgat, Guido N.

AU - Wiegers, Wolfram

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - The distribution of biomedical information was transfigured over three centuries ago with the introduction of scientific journals. This enabled the widespread dissemination of data to global audiences and greatly facilitated not only the advance of science but amplified the interaction between investigators despite their different locations. This process continued to expand in a linear fashion prior to the emergence of the Internet. The latter system has prompted a phenomenal augmentation of information accessibility, and its everexpanding use has resulted in an exponential increase in the demand for digital technology and online resources. This technology has achieved unprecedented acceptance in the scientific domain and enabled publishers to expeditiously produce and distribute journal contents online. Such unparalleled access to information has sparked incendiary debate within the scientific community and among journal publishers in regard to numerous issues. It is thus much debated as to who has the right to "own" or control intellectual property, whether information should be made freely available to the online global community, how to gauge the legitimacy and authenticity of published research, and the need to reexamine the feasibility and profitability of paper journals in consideration of the digital, online formats that continue to gain popularity. To assess the current status of the situation, a meeting of journal editors, research scientists, and publishing executives was held in Constance, Germany, on June 26, 2004, to discuss these issues and formulate strategies and recommendations for the future of biomedical publishing. Herewith we provide a summation (manifesto) of the meeting's proceedings and provide a consensus opinion with the aim of illuminating the subject and also proposing some putative solutions for the major challenges that currently confront the scientific and publishing community.

AB - The distribution of biomedical information was transfigured over three centuries ago with the introduction of scientific journals. This enabled the widespread dissemination of data to global audiences and greatly facilitated not only the advance of science but amplified the interaction between investigators despite their different locations. This process continued to expand in a linear fashion prior to the emergence of the Internet. The latter system has prompted a phenomenal augmentation of information accessibility, and its everexpanding use has resulted in an exponential increase in the demand for digital technology and online resources. This technology has achieved unprecedented acceptance in the scientific domain and enabled publishers to expeditiously produce and distribute journal contents online. Such unparalleled access to information has sparked incendiary debate within the scientific community and among journal publishers in regard to numerous issues. It is thus much debated as to who has the right to "own" or control intellectual property, whether information should be made freely available to the online global community, how to gauge the legitimacy and authenticity of published research, and the need to reexamine the feasibility and profitability of paper journals in consideration of the digital, online formats that continue to gain popularity. To assess the current status of the situation, a meeting of journal editors, research scientists, and publishing executives was held in Constance, Germany, on June 26, 2004, to discuss these issues and formulate strategies and recommendations for the future of biomedical publishing. Herewith we provide a summation (manifesto) of the meeting's proceedings and provide a consensus opinion with the aim of illuminating the subject and also proposing some putative solutions for the major challenges that currently confront the scientific and publishing community.

KW - Impact factor

KW - Open access

KW - Peer-review

KW - Publishing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20044371975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20044371975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mcg.0000152791.45765.32

DO - 10.1097/01.mcg.0000152791.45765.32

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 181

EP - 188

JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

SN - 0192-0790

IS - 3

ER -