Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments

DaiWai M. Olson, Sonja Stutzman, Ciji Saju, Margaret Wilson, Weidan Zhao, Venkatesh Aiyagari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Subjective scoring of pupil reactivity is a fundamental element of the neurological examination for which the pupillometer provides an objective measure. Methods: This single-blinded observational study examined interrater reliability of pupil exam findings between two practitioners and between practitioners and a pupillometer. Results: From 2329 paired assessments, the interrater reliability between practitioners was only moderate for pupil size (k = 0.54), shape (k = 0.62), and reactivity (k = 0.40). Only 33.3 % of pupils scored as non-reactive by practitioners were scored as non-reactive by pupillometry. Conclusions: Despite the strong emphasis placed on the traditional pupil examination, especially for patients with a neurological illness, there is limited interrater reliability for subjective scoring of pupillary assessments. Thus, the use of automated pupillometers should be examined as a potential method to increase the reliability of measuring of pupil reactivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNeurocritical Care
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 17 2015

Fingerprint

Pupil
Neurologic Examination
Observational Studies

Keywords

  • Interrater reliability
  • Neurological illness
  • Pupil assessment
  • Pupillometry
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments. / Olson, DaiWai M.; Stutzman, Sonja; Saju, Ciji; Wilson, Margaret; Zhao, Weidan; Aiyagari, Venkatesh.

In: Neurocritical Care, 17.09.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olson, DaiWai M. ; Stutzman, Sonja ; Saju, Ciji ; Wilson, Margaret ; Zhao, Weidan ; Aiyagari, Venkatesh. / Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments. In: Neurocritical Care. 2015.
@article{483c1713db794f25afed27d7d9c7905b,
title = "Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments",
abstract = "Background: Subjective scoring of pupil reactivity is a fundamental element of the neurological examination for which the pupillometer provides an objective measure. Methods: This single-blinded observational study examined interrater reliability of pupil exam findings between two practitioners and between practitioners and a pupillometer. Results: From 2329 paired assessments, the interrater reliability between practitioners was only moderate for pupil size (k = 0.54), shape (k = 0.62), and reactivity (k = 0.40). Only 33.3 {\%} of pupils scored as non-reactive by practitioners were scored as non-reactive by pupillometry. Conclusions: Despite the strong emphasis placed on the traditional pupil examination, especially for patients with a neurological illness, there is limited interrater reliability for subjective scoring of pupillary assessments. Thus, the use of automated pupillometers should be examined as a potential method to increase the reliability of measuring of pupil reactivity.",
keywords = "Interrater reliability, Neurological illness, Pupil assessment, Pupillometry, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Olson, {DaiWai M.} and Sonja Stutzman and Ciji Saju and Margaret Wilson and Weidan Zhao and Venkatesh Aiyagari",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s12028-015-0182-1",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Neurocritical Care",
issn = "1541-6933",
publisher = "Humana Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments

AU - Olson, DaiWai M.

AU - Stutzman, Sonja

AU - Saju, Ciji

AU - Wilson, Margaret

AU - Zhao, Weidan

AU - Aiyagari, Venkatesh

PY - 2015/9/17

Y1 - 2015/9/17

N2 - Background: Subjective scoring of pupil reactivity is a fundamental element of the neurological examination for which the pupillometer provides an objective measure. Methods: This single-blinded observational study examined interrater reliability of pupil exam findings between two practitioners and between practitioners and a pupillometer. Results: From 2329 paired assessments, the interrater reliability between practitioners was only moderate for pupil size (k = 0.54), shape (k = 0.62), and reactivity (k = 0.40). Only 33.3 % of pupils scored as non-reactive by practitioners were scored as non-reactive by pupillometry. Conclusions: Despite the strong emphasis placed on the traditional pupil examination, especially for patients with a neurological illness, there is limited interrater reliability for subjective scoring of pupillary assessments. Thus, the use of automated pupillometers should be examined as a potential method to increase the reliability of measuring of pupil reactivity.

AB - Background: Subjective scoring of pupil reactivity is a fundamental element of the neurological examination for which the pupillometer provides an objective measure. Methods: This single-blinded observational study examined interrater reliability of pupil exam findings between two practitioners and between practitioners and a pupillometer. Results: From 2329 paired assessments, the interrater reliability between practitioners was only moderate for pupil size (k = 0.54), shape (k = 0.62), and reactivity (k = 0.40). Only 33.3 % of pupils scored as non-reactive by practitioners were scored as non-reactive by pupillometry. Conclusions: Despite the strong emphasis placed on the traditional pupil examination, especially for patients with a neurological illness, there is limited interrater reliability for subjective scoring of pupillary assessments. Thus, the use of automated pupillometers should be examined as a potential method to increase the reliability of measuring of pupil reactivity.

KW - Interrater reliability

KW - Neurological illness

KW - Pupil assessment

KW - Pupillometry

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941695553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941695553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12028-015-0182-1

DO - 10.1007/s12028-015-0182-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 26381281

AN - SCOPUS:84941695553

JO - Neurocritical Care

JF - Neurocritical Care

SN - 1541-6933

ER -