Investigation of suspected nosocomial clusters of staphylococcus Haemolyticus infections

Trish M. Perl, Wolfgang A. Krüger, Alison Houston, Linda D. Boyken, Michael A. Pfaller, Loreen A. Herwaldt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether typing methods can discriminate among Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates. DESIGN: Molecular epidemiological evaluation of S haemolyticus isolates obtained from patients hospitalized on a hematology service and in a surgical intensive-care unit (SICU). SETTING: A large Midwestern teaching hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Over 22 days, S haemolyticus was isolated from five patients on the hematology service. Isolates from four patients had the same unusual antibiogram and biotype. Ribotyping, restriction endonuclease digestion of plasmid DNA (REAP), and whole chromosomal DNA analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) confirmed that these isolates were identical and different from the fifth patient's isolate and from 6 control isolates. In a second cluster, 11 S haemolyticus isolates obtained from eight patients in the SICU had similar antibiograms and biotypes. By REAP and ribotype analysis, isolates from four patients were identical. However, PFGE indicated that only two of these patients shared a common strain. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiograms or biotyping may discriminate among isolates of S haemolyticus if the results of these tests are unusual. Many clinical isolates can be differentiated by REAP analysis, ribotyping, or PFGE. However, some isolates are identical by all of these methods, suggesting that they may have been transmilled nosocomially.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-131
Number of pages4
JournalInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999

Fingerprint

Staphylococcus haemolyticus
Ribotyping
Infection
Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis
DNA Restriction Enzymes
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Digestion
Plasmids
DNA
Hematology
Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Teaching Hospitals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Investigation of suspected nosocomial clusters of staphylococcus Haemolyticus infections. / Perl, Trish M.; Krüger, Wolfgang A.; Houston, Alison; Boyken, Linda D.; Pfaller, Michael A.; Herwaldt, Loreen A.

In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.12.1999, p. 128-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perl, Trish M. ; Krüger, Wolfgang A. ; Houston, Alison ; Boyken, Linda D. ; Pfaller, Michael A. ; Herwaldt, Loreen A. / Investigation of suspected nosocomial clusters of staphylococcus Haemolyticus infections. In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1999 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 128-131.
@article{ac3be90b51ea4af6b54d32458cc70de0,
title = "Investigation of suspected nosocomial clusters of staphylococcus Haemolyticus infections",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine whether typing methods can discriminate among Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates. DESIGN: Molecular epidemiological evaluation of S haemolyticus isolates obtained from patients hospitalized on a hematology service and in a surgical intensive-care unit (SICU). SETTING: A large Midwestern teaching hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Over 22 days, S haemolyticus was isolated from five patients on the hematology service. Isolates from four patients had the same unusual antibiogram and biotype. Ribotyping, restriction endonuclease digestion of plasmid DNA (REAP), and whole chromosomal DNA analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) confirmed that these isolates were identical and different from the fifth patient's isolate and from 6 control isolates. In a second cluster, 11 S haemolyticus isolates obtained from eight patients in the SICU had similar antibiograms and biotypes. By REAP and ribotype analysis, isolates from four patients were identical. However, PFGE indicated that only two of these patients shared a common strain. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiograms or biotyping may discriminate among isolates of S haemolyticus if the results of these tests are unusual. Many clinical isolates can be differentiated by REAP analysis, ribotyping, or PFGE. However, some isolates are identical by all of these methods, suggesting that they may have been transmilled nosocomially.",
author = "Perl, {Trish M.} and Kr{\"u}ger, {Wolfgang A.} and Alison Houston and Boyken, {Linda D.} and Pfaller, {Michael A.} and Herwaldt, {Loreen A.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/501599",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "128--131",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigation of suspected nosocomial clusters of staphylococcus Haemolyticus infections

AU - Perl, Trish M.

AU - Krüger, Wolfgang A.

AU - Houston, Alison

AU - Boyken, Linda D.

AU - Pfaller, Michael A.

AU - Herwaldt, Loreen A.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine whether typing methods can discriminate among Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates. DESIGN: Molecular epidemiological evaluation of S haemolyticus isolates obtained from patients hospitalized on a hematology service and in a surgical intensive-care unit (SICU). SETTING: A large Midwestern teaching hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Over 22 days, S haemolyticus was isolated from five patients on the hematology service. Isolates from four patients had the same unusual antibiogram and biotype. Ribotyping, restriction endonuclease digestion of plasmid DNA (REAP), and whole chromosomal DNA analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) confirmed that these isolates were identical and different from the fifth patient's isolate and from 6 control isolates. In a second cluster, 11 S haemolyticus isolates obtained from eight patients in the SICU had similar antibiograms and biotypes. By REAP and ribotype analysis, isolates from four patients were identical. However, PFGE indicated that only two of these patients shared a common strain. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiograms or biotyping may discriminate among isolates of S haemolyticus if the results of these tests are unusual. Many clinical isolates can be differentiated by REAP analysis, ribotyping, or PFGE. However, some isolates are identical by all of these methods, suggesting that they may have been transmilled nosocomially.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine whether typing methods can discriminate among Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates. DESIGN: Molecular epidemiological evaluation of S haemolyticus isolates obtained from patients hospitalized on a hematology service and in a surgical intensive-care unit (SICU). SETTING: A large Midwestern teaching hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Over 22 days, S haemolyticus was isolated from five patients on the hematology service. Isolates from four patients had the same unusual antibiogram and biotype. Ribotyping, restriction endonuclease digestion of plasmid DNA (REAP), and whole chromosomal DNA analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) confirmed that these isolates were identical and different from the fifth patient's isolate and from 6 control isolates. In a second cluster, 11 S haemolyticus isolates obtained from eight patients in the SICU had similar antibiograms and biotypes. By REAP and ribotype analysis, isolates from four patients were identical. However, PFGE indicated that only two of these patients shared a common strain. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiograms or biotyping may discriminate among isolates of S haemolyticus if the results of these tests are unusual. Many clinical isolates can be differentiated by REAP analysis, ribotyping, or PFGE. However, some isolates are identical by all of these methods, suggesting that they may have been transmilled nosocomially.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033071714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033071714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/501599

DO - 10.1086/501599

M3 - Article

C2 - 10064218

AN - SCOPUS:0033071714

VL - 20

SP - 128

EP - 131

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

IS - 2

ER -