TY - JOUR
T1 - Is Robotic Gait Training Feasible in Adults with Disorders of Consciousness?
AU - Williams, Kathryn
AU - Christenbury, Jennifer
AU - Niemeier, Janet P.
AU - Newman, Mark
AU - Pinto, Shanti
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in adults with disorders of consciousness (DoC). Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Four adult male patients with traumatic brain injury and DoC. Design: Subjects participated in RAGT with body weight support for 5 to 20 minutes, over 1- to 2-week periods. Main Measures: Primary measures included vital signs, walking parameters, pain, arousal, and Agitation Behavior Scale scores. Additional data included Modified Ashworth Scale, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, and Rancho Los Amigos Scale scores. Results: All participants safely completed at least one session of RAGT with body weight support with safe vital signs and low agitation levels. Two adverse events occurred (increased somnolence and pain due to harness placement), which were not considered severe. All subjects emerged out of DoC at which point research protocol was stopped. Conclusions: Findings suggest inpatient-based RAGT may be safe and feasible to consider when developing a therapy plan of care in adults with DoC.
AB - Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in adults with disorders of consciousness (DoC). Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Four adult male patients with traumatic brain injury and DoC. Design: Subjects participated in RAGT with body weight support for 5 to 20 minutes, over 1- to 2-week periods. Main Measures: Primary measures included vital signs, walking parameters, pain, arousal, and Agitation Behavior Scale scores. Additional data included Modified Ashworth Scale, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, and Rancho Los Amigos Scale scores. Results: All participants safely completed at least one session of RAGT with body weight support with safe vital signs and low agitation levels. Two adverse events occurred (increased somnolence and pain due to harness placement), which were not considered severe. All subjects emerged out of DoC at which point research protocol was stopped. Conclusions: Findings suggest inpatient-based RAGT may be safe and feasible to consider when developing a therapy plan of care in adults with DoC.
KW - disorders of consciousness
KW - robotic-assisted gait training
KW - traumatic brain injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072773426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072773426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000523
DO - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000523
M3 - Article
C2 - 31479078
AN - SCOPUS:85072773426
SN - 0885-9701
JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
ER -