Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes

Rory McCloy, Delia Randall, Stephan A. Schug, Henrik Kehlet, Christian Simanski, Francis Bonnet, Frederic Camu, Barrie Fischer, Girish Joshi, Narinder Rawal, Edmund A M Neugebauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision <25 mm) has been increasingly advocated for the removal of the gallbladder, due to potentially better surgical outcomes (e.g., better cosmetic result, reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker return to activity), but an evidence-based approach has been lacking. The current systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the importance of total size of trocar incision in improving surgical outcomes in adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: The literature was systematically reviewed using MEDLINE and EmBASE. Only randomized controlled trials in English, investigating minilaparoscopic versus conventional LC (total size of trocar incision ≥25 mm) and reporting pain scores were included. Quantitative analyses (meta-analyses) were performed on postoperative pain scores and other patient outcomes from more than one study where feasible and appropriate. Qualitative analyses consisted of assessing the number of studies showing a significant difference between the techniques. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria. There was a trend towards reduced pain with MLC compared with conventional LC, without reduction in opioid use. Patients in the MLC group had slightly reduced length of hospital stay, but there were no significant differences for return to activity. The two interventions were also similar in terms of operating times and adverse events, but MLC was associated with better cosmetic result (largely patient rated). There was a significantly greater likelihood of conversion to conventional LC or to open cholecystectomy in the MLC group than there was of conversion to open cholecystectomy in the conventional LC group [OR 4.71 (95% confidence interval 2.67-8.31), p < 0.00001]. Conclusions: The data included in this review suggest that reducing the size of trocar incision results in some limited improvements in surgical outcomes after LC. However, it carries a higher risk of conversion to conventional LC or open cholecystectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2541-2553
Number of pages13
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Surgical Instruments
Length of Stay
Pain
Cosmetics
Postoperative Pain
Gallbladder
MEDLINE
Opioid Analgesics
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. / McCloy, Rory; Randall, Delia; Schug, Stephan A.; Kehlet, Henrik; Simanski, Christian; Bonnet, Francis; Camu, Frederic; Fischer, Barrie; Joshi, Girish; Rawal, Narinder; Neugebauer, Edmund A M.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 22, No. 12, 12.2008, p. 2541-2553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCloy, Rory ; Randall, Delia ; Schug, Stephan A. ; Kehlet, Henrik ; Simanski, Christian ; Bonnet, Francis ; Camu, Frederic ; Fischer, Barrie ; Joshi, Girish ; Rawal, Narinder ; Neugebauer, Edmund A M. / Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 12. pp. 2541-2553.
@article{7f0e691497754365b20d1b324d2d908d,
title = "Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes",
abstract = "Background: In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision <25 mm) has been increasingly advocated for the removal of the gallbladder, due to potentially better surgical outcomes (e.g., better cosmetic result, reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker return to activity), but an evidence-based approach has been lacking. The current systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the importance of total size of trocar incision in improving surgical outcomes in adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: The literature was systematically reviewed using MEDLINE and EmBASE. Only randomized controlled trials in English, investigating minilaparoscopic versus conventional LC (total size of trocar incision ≥25 mm) and reporting pain scores were included. Quantitative analyses (meta-analyses) were performed on postoperative pain scores and other patient outcomes from more than one study where feasible and appropriate. Qualitative analyses consisted of assessing the number of studies showing a significant difference between the techniques. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria. There was a trend towards reduced pain with MLC compared with conventional LC, without reduction in opioid use. Patients in the MLC group had slightly reduced length of hospital stay, but there were no significant differences for return to activity. The two interventions were also similar in terms of operating times and adverse events, but MLC was associated with better cosmetic result (largely patient rated). There was a significantly greater likelihood of conversion to conventional LC or to open cholecystectomy in the MLC group than there was of conversion to open cholecystectomy in the conventional LC group [OR 4.71 (95{\%} confidence interval 2.67-8.31), p < 0.00001]. Conclusions: The data included in this review suggest that reducing the size of trocar incision results in some limited improvements in surgical outcomes after LC. However, it carries a higher risk of conversion to conventional LC or open cholecystectomy.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy, Systematic review",
author = "Rory McCloy and Delia Randall and Schug, {Stephan A.} and Henrik Kehlet and Christian Simanski and Francis Bonnet and Frederic Camu and Barrie Fischer and Girish Joshi and Narinder Rawal and Neugebauer, {Edmund A M}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "2541--2553",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes

AU - McCloy, Rory

AU - Randall, Delia

AU - Schug, Stephan A.

AU - Kehlet, Henrik

AU - Simanski, Christian

AU - Bonnet, Francis

AU - Camu, Frederic

AU - Fischer, Barrie

AU - Joshi, Girish

AU - Rawal, Narinder

AU - Neugebauer, Edmund A M

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Background: In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision <25 mm) has been increasingly advocated for the removal of the gallbladder, due to potentially better surgical outcomes (e.g., better cosmetic result, reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker return to activity), but an evidence-based approach has been lacking. The current systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the importance of total size of trocar incision in improving surgical outcomes in adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: The literature was systematically reviewed using MEDLINE and EmBASE. Only randomized controlled trials in English, investigating minilaparoscopic versus conventional LC (total size of trocar incision ≥25 mm) and reporting pain scores were included. Quantitative analyses (meta-analyses) were performed on postoperative pain scores and other patient outcomes from more than one study where feasible and appropriate. Qualitative analyses consisted of assessing the number of studies showing a significant difference between the techniques. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria. There was a trend towards reduced pain with MLC compared with conventional LC, without reduction in opioid use. Patients in the MLC group had slightly reduced length of hospital stay, but there were no significant differences for return to activity. The two interventions were also similar in terms of operating times and adverse events, but MLC was associated with better cosmetic result (largely patient rated). There was a significantly greater likelihood of conversion to conventional LC or to open cholecystectomy in the MLC group than there was of conversion to open cholecystectomy in the conventional LC group [OR 4.71 (95% confidence interval 2.67-8.31), p < 0.00001]. Conclusions: The data included in this review suggest that reducing the size of trocar incision results in some limited improvements in surgical outcomes after LC. However, it carries a higher risk of conversion to conventional LC or open cholecystectomy.

AB - Background: In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision <25 mm) has been increasingly advocated for the removal of the gallbladder, due to potentially better surgical outcomes (e.g., better cosmetic result, reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker return to activity), but an evidence-based approach has been lacking. The current systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the importance of total size of trocar incision in improving surgical outcomes in adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: The literature was systematically reviewed using MEDLINE and EmBASE. Only randomized controlled trials in English, investigating minilaparoscopic versus conventional LC (total size of trocar incision ≥25 mm) and reporting pain scores were included. Quantitative analyses (meta-analyses) were performed on postoperative pain scores and other patient outcomes from more than one study where feasible and appropriate. Qualitative analyses consisted of assessing the number of studies showing a significant difference between the techniques. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria. There was a trend towards reduced pain with MLC compared with conventional LC, without reduction in opioid use. Patients in the MLC group had slightly reduced length of hospital stay, but there were no significant differences for return to activity. The two interventions were also similar in terms of operating times and adverse events, but MLC was associated with better cosmetic result (largely patient rated). There was a significantly greater likelihood of conversion to conventional LC or to open cholecystectomy in the MLC group than there was of conversion to open cholecystectomy in the conventional LC group [OR 4.71 (95% confidence interval 2.67-8.31), p < 0.00001]. Conclusions: The data included in this review suggest that reducing the size of trocar incision results in some limited improvements in surgical outcomes after LC. However, it carries a higher risk of conversion to conventional LC or open cholecystectomy.

KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

KW - Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56349169289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56349169289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

DO - 10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 18810546

AN - SCOPUS:56349169289

VL - 22

SP - 2541

EP - 2553

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 12

ER -