Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass using the porcine model

D. J. Scott, D. A. Provost, S. T. Tesfay, D. B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) may be performed using a variety of methods. The purpose of this study was to learn how to perform the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation laparoscopically, using a porcine model. Materials and Methods: 11 domestic pigs (mean weight 47 kg) underwent LRYGBP. In 8 animals, a completely laparoscopic approach was attempted, while in 3 animals a hand-assist device was used. Techniques for anvil placement, pouch calibration, and limb-length measurement were evaluated. Animals were sacrificed at the end of the procedure, and operative results were recorded. Results: The hand-assist device restored tactile feedback but obscured visualization. The gastrojejunostomy leak rate was 64%, and the jejunojejunostomy leak rate was 73%. Anvil placement using transgastric and transoral methods was feasible. Calibrating the pouch with a Baker's tube was more accurate than using anatomical landmarks. Measuring limb-lengths using Babcock clamps was reliable with practice. Conclusion: The frailty of the porcine small intestine may limit one's ability to achieve intact anastomoses. Despite the anatomic limitations, the porcine model was well-suited for skill development and evaluation of techniques for performing the LRYGBP operation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-53
Number of pages8
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Swine
Extremities
Hand
Equipment and Supplies
Sus scrofa
Operative Surgical Procedures
Touch
Calibration
Small Intestine
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Hand-assist device
  • Laparoscopy
  • Morbid obesity
  • Porcine model
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
  • Skill development
  • Surgical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass using the porcine model. / Scott, D. J.; Provost, D. A.; Tesfay, S. T.; Jones, D. B.

In: Obesity Surgery, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2001, p. 46-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, D. J. ; Provost, D. A. ; Tesfay, S. T. ; Jones, D. B. / Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass using the porcine model. In: Obesity Surgery. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 46-53.
@article{e2590e62742145e2adb57b3653cb42b3,
title = "Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass using the porcine model",
abstract = "Background: The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) may be performed using a variety of methods. The purpose of this study was to learn how to perform the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation laparoscopically, using a porcine model. Materials and Methods: 11 domestic pigs (mean weight 47 kg) underwent LRYGBP. In 8 animals, a completely laparoscopic approach was attempted, while in 3 animals a hand-assist device was used. Techniques for anvil placement, pouch calibration, and limb-length measurement were evaluated. Animals were sacrificed at the end of the procedure, and operative results were recorded. Results: The hand-assist device restored tactile feedback but obscured visualization. The gastrojejunostomy leak rate was 64{\%}, and the jejunojejunostomy leak rate was 73{\%}. Anvil placement using transgastric and transoral methods was feasible. Calibrating the pouch with a Baker's tube was more accurate than using anatomical landmarks. Measuring limb-lengths using Babcock clamps was reliable with practice. Conclusion: The frailty of the porcine small intestine may limit one's ability to achieve intact anastomoses. Despite the anatomic limitations, the porcine model was well-suited for skill development and evaluation of techniques for performing the LRYGBP operation.",
keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Hand-assist device, Laparoscopy, Morbid obesity, Porcine model, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Skill development, Surgical education",
author = "Scott, {D. J.} and Provost, {D. A.} and Tesfay, {S. T.} and Jones, {D. B.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1381/096089201321454105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "46--53",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass using the porcine model

AU - Scott, D. J.

AU - Provost, D. A.

AU - Tesfay, S. T.

AU - Jones, D. B.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background: The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) may be performed using a variety of methods. The purpose of this study was to learn how to perform the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation laparoscopically, using a porcine model. Materials and Methods: 11 domestic pigs (mean weight 47 kg) underwent LRYGBP. In 8 animals, a completely laparoscopic approach was attempted, while in 3 animals a hand-assist device was used. Techniques for anvil placement, pouch calibration, and limb-length measurement were evaluated. Animals were sacrificed at the end of the procedure, and operative results were recorded. Results: The hand-assist device restored tactile feedback but obscured visualization. The gastrojejunostomy leak rate was 64%, and the jejunojejunostomy leak rate was 73%. Anvil placement using transgastric and transoral methods was feasible. Calibrating the pouch with a Baker's tube was more accurate than using anatomical landmarks. Measuring limb-lengths using Babcock clamps was reliable with practice. Conclusion: The frailty of the porcine small intestine may limit one's ability to achieve intact anastomoses. Despite the anatomic limitations, the porcine model was well-suited for skill development and evaluation of techniques for performing the LRYGBP operation.

AB - Background: The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) may be performed using a variety of methods. The purpose of this study was to learn how to perform the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation laparoscopically, using a porcine model. Materials and Methods: 11 domestic pigs (mean weight 47 kg) underwent LRYGBP. In 8 animals, a completely laparoscopic approach was attempted, while in 3 animals a hand-assist device was used. Techniques for anvil placement, pouch calibration, and limb-length measurement were evaluated. Animals were sacrificed at the end of the procedure, and operative results were recorded. Results: The hand-assist device restored tactile feedback but obscured visualization. The gastrojejunostomy leak rate was 64%, and the jejunojejunostomy leak rate was 73%. Anvil placement using transgastric and transoral methods was feasible. Calibrating the pouch with a Baker's tube was more accurate than using anatomical landmarks. Measuring limb-lengths using Babcock clamps was reliable with practice. Conclusion: The frailty of the porcine small intestine may limit one's ability to achieve intact anastomoses. Despite the anatomic limitations, the porcine model was well-suited for skill development and evaluation of techniques for performing the LRYGBP operation.

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Hand-assist device

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Morbid obesity

KW - Porcine model

KW - Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

KW - Skill development

KW - Surgical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035119046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035119046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1381/096089201321454105

DO - 10.1381/096089201321454105

M3 - Article

C2 - 11361168

AN - SCOPUS:0035119046

VL - 11

SP - 46

EP - 53

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

IS - 1

ER -