Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hemiorrhaphy: Cost comparison at teaching hospitals

Benjamin E. Schneider, Juan M. Castillo, Leonardo Villegas, Daniel J. Scott, Daniel B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic hernia repair is safe and effective and may result in less postoperative pain and faster recuperation compared with traditional open hernia repairs. Controversy exists as to the increased cost associated with laparoscopic repairs. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the cost of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic repair and the tension-free Lichtenstein repair at teaching hospitals. The records of consecutive TEP (n = 28) and Lichtenstein (n = 28) repairs performed at Parkland Memorial Hospital and Zale-Lipshy University Hospital were reviewed. A detailed cost analysis was performed. Total patient charge ($5,509 vs. $3,999) and total cost ($2,861 vs. $2,009) were higher for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Operative time and complications were similar for both groups. Return to full activity (15 vs. 34 days) was faster for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Of 9 patients in the TEP group who had previously undergone an open hernia repair, 8 (89%) preferred the laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic TEP repair costs $852 more than the Lichtenstein repair. The TEP repair results in faster recuperation. Patient preference and faster recuperation may offset the increased cost associated with laparoscopic hernia repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-267
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Volume13
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Fingerprint

Teaching Hospitals
Herniorrhaphy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Preference
Operative Time
Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Cost analysis
  • Hernia
  • Hernia repair
  • Laparoscopy
  • Lichtenstein

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hemiorrhaphy : Cost comparison at teaching hospitals. / Schneider, Benjamin E.; Castillo, Juan M.; Villegas, Leonardo; Scott, Daniel J.; Jones, Daniel B.

In: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, Vol. 13, No. 4, 08.2003, p. 261-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{14c5cd474e104f19929ca7a5634d53ef,
title = "Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hemiorrhaphy: Cost comparison at teaching hospitals",
abstract = "Laparoscopic hernia repair is safe and effective and may result in less postoperative pain and faster recuperation compared with traditional open hernia repairs. Controversy exists as to the increased cost associated with laparoscopic repairs. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the cost of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic repair and the tension-free Lichtenstein repair at teaching hospitals. The records of consecutive TEP (n = 28) and Lichtenstein (n = 28) repairs performed at Parkland Memorial Hospital and Zale-Lipshy University Hospital were reviewed. A detailed cost analysis was performed. Total patient charge ($5,509 vs. $3,999) and total cost ($2,861 vs. $2,009) were higher for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Operative time and complications were similar for both groups. Return to full activity (15 vs. 34 days) was faster for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Of 9 patients in the TEP group who had previously undergone an open hernia repair, 8 (89{\%}) preferred the laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic TEP repair costs $852 more than the Lichtenstein repair. The TEP repair results in faster recuperation. Patient preference and faster recuperation may offset the increased cost associated with laparoscopic hernia repair.",
keywords = "Cost analysis, Hernia, Hernia repair, Laparoscopy, Lichtenstein",
author = "Schneider, {Benjamin E.} and Castillo, {Juan M.} and Leonardo Villegas and Scott, {Daniel J.} and Jones, {Daniel B.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "261--267",
journal = "Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques",
issn = "1051-7200",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hemiorrhaphy

T2 - Cost comparison at teaching hospitals

AU - Schneider, Benjamin E.

AU - Castillo, Juan M.

AU - Villegas, Leonardo

AU - Scott, Daniel J.

AU - Jones, Daniel B.

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Laparoscopic hernia repair is safe and effective and may result in less postoperative pain and faster recuperation compared with traditional open hernia repairs. Controversy exists as to the increased cost associated with laparoscopic repairs. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the cost of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic repair and the tension-free Lichtenstein repair at teaching hospitals. The records of consecutive TEP (n = 28) and Lichtenstein (n = 28) repairs performed at Parkland Memorial Hospital and Zale-Lipshy University Hospital were reviewed. A detailed cost analysis was performed. Total patient charge ($5,509 vs. $3,999) and total cost ($2,861 vs. $2,009) were higher for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Operative time and complications were similar for both groups. Return to full activity (15 vs. 34 days) was faster for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Of 9 patients in the TEP group who had previously undergone an open hernia repair, 8 (89%) preferred the laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic TEP repair costs $852 more than the Lichtenstein repair. The TEP repair results in faster recuperation. Patient preference and faster recuperation may offset the increased cost associated with laparoscopic hernia repair.

AB - Laparoscopic hernia repair is safe and effective and may result in less postoperative pain and faster recuperation compared with traditional open hernia repairs. Controversy exists as to the increased cost associated with laparoscopic repairs. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the cost of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic repair and the tension-free Lichtenstein repair at teaching hospitals. The records of consecutive TEP (n = 28) and Lichtenstein (n = 28) repairs performed at Parkland Memorial Hospital and Zale-Lipshy University Hospital were reviewed. A detailed cost analysis was performed. Total patient charge ($5,509 vs. $3,999) and total cost ($2,861 vs. $2,009) were higher for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Operative time and complications were similar for both groups. Return to full activity (15 vs. 34 days) was faster for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Of 9 patients in the TEP group who had previously undergone an open hernia repair, 8 (89%) preferred the laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic TEP repair costs $852 more than the Lichtenstein repair. The TEP repair results in faster recuperation. Patient preference and faster recuperation may offset the increased cost associated with laparoscopic hernia repair.

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Hernia

KW - Hernia repair

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Lichtenstein

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042817868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042817868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12960790

AN - SCOPUS:0042817868

VL - 13

SP - 261

EP - 267

JO - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

JF - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

SN - 1051-7200

IS - 4

ER -