Legal regimes surrounding naloxone access

considerations for prescribers

Joy E. Brodrick, Collin K. Brodrick, Bryon Adinoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Since the late 1980s, opioid-related morbidity and mortality in the United States has dramatically increased. This serious epidemic requires a coordinated medical, public policy, and social response. It is becoming readily apparent that widespread provision of naloxone may help to address this problem. However, because naloxone access laws vary between states, the extent of antidote dissemination may be limited by a given provider’s geographic location. Objective: This review targets a physician or prescriber audience, in hopes of providing evidence for the safety and utility of naloxone, education on the baseline legal liability of naloxone provision and protections afforded by access laws, and resources for the proposal of statewide legislation to promote antidote distribution. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that naloxone administration by laypersons, pursuant to physician prescription or standing order, is safe and effective for reversal of opioid overdose. As of July 2015, 44 states and the District of Columbia have passed naloxone access laws, offering varying degrees of protections for prescribers. Although the likelihood of naloxone-related legal action may parallel that inherent to the usual practice of medicine, providers should be mindful of potential scenarios, exercise methods to mitigate risk, and appreciate the utility of comprehensive naloxone access legislation in orchestrating a coordinated response to the opioid overdose epidemic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 23 2016

Fingerprint

Naloxone
Opioid Analgesics
Antidotes
Legislation
Physicians
Legal Liability
Geographic Locations
Public Policy
Medicine
Exercise
Morbidity
Safety
Education
Mortality

Keywords

  • drug overdose
  • legal liability
  • Naloxone
  • opioids
  • public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Legal regimes surrounding naloxone access : considerations for prescribers. / Brodrick, Joy E.; Brodrick, Collin K.; Adinoff, Bryon.

In: American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23.01.2016, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a9cf2dfbde54098a16a0973ee43dd7b,
title = "Legal regimes surrounding naloxone access: considerations for prescribers",
abstract = "Background: Since the late 1980s, opioid-related morbidity and mortality in the United States has dramatically increased. This serious epidemic requires a coordinated medical, public policy, and social response. It is becoming readily apparent that widespread provision of naloxone may help to address this problem. However, because naloxone access laws vary between states, the extent of antidote dissemination may be limited by a given provider’s geographic location. Objective: This review targets a physician or prescriber audience, in hopes of providing evidence for the safety and utility of naloxone, education on the baseline legal liability of naloxone provision and protections afforded by access laws, and resources for the proposal of statewide legislation to promote antidote distribution. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that naloxone administration by laypersons, pursuant to physician prescription or standing order, is safe and effective for reversal of opioid overdose. As of July 2015, 44 states and the District of Columbia have passed naloxone access laws, offering varying degrees of protections for prescribers. Although the likelihood of naloxone-related legal action may parallel that inherent to the usual practice of medicine, providers should be mindful of potential scenarios, exercise methods to mitigate risk, and appreciate the utility of comprehensive naloxone access legislation in orchestrating a coordinated response to the opioid overdose epidemic.",
keywords = "drug overdose, legal liability, Naloxone, opioids, public health",
author = "Brodrick, {Joy E.} and Brodrick, {Collin K.} and Bryon Adinoff",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "23",
doi = "10.3109/00952990.2015.1109648",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse",
issn = "0095-2990",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal regimes surrounding naloxone access

T2 - considerations for prescribers

AU - Brodrick, Joy E.

AU - Brodrick, Collin K.

AU - Adinoff, Bryon

PY - 2016/1/23

Y1 - 2016/1/23

N2 - Background: Since the late 1980s, opioid-related morbidity and mortality in the United States has dramatically increased. This serious epidemic requires a coordinated medical, public policy, and social response. It is becoming readily apparent that widespread provision of naloxone may help to address this problem. However, because naloxone access laws vary between states, the extent of antidote dissemination may be limited by a given provider’s geographic location. Objective: This review targets a physician or prescriber audience, in hopes of providing evidence for the safety and utility of naloxone, education on the baseline legal liability of naloxone provision and protections afforded by access laws, and resources for the proposal of statewide legislation to promote antidote distribution. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that naloxone administration by laypersons, pursuant to physician prescription or standing order, is safe and effective for reversal of opioid overdose. As of July 2015, 44 states and the District of Columbia have passed naloxone access laws, offering varying degrees of protections for prescribers. Although the likelihood of naloxone-related legal action may parallel that inherent to the usual practice of medicine, providers should be mindful of potential scenarios, exercise methods to mitigate risk, and appreciate the utility of comprehensive naloxone access legislation in orchestrating a coordinated response to the opioid overdose epidemic.

AB - Background: Since the late 1980s, opioid-related morbidity and mortality in the United States has dramatically increased. This serious epidemic requires a coordinated medical, public policy, and social response. It is becoming readily apparent that widespread provision of naloxone may help to address this problem. However, because naloxone access laws vary between states, the extent of antidote dissemination may be limited by a given provider’s geographic location. Objective: This review targets a physician or prescriber audience, in hopes of providing evidence for the safety and utility of naloxone, education on the baseline legal liability of naloxone provision and protections afforded by access laws, and resources for the proposal of statewide legislation to promote antidote distribution. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that naloxone administration by laypersons, pursuant to physician prescription or standing order, is safe and effective for reversal of opioid overdose. As of July 2015, 44 states and the District of Columbia have passed naloxone access laws, offering varying degrees of protections for prescribers. Although the likelihood of naloxone-related legal action may parallel that inherent to the usual practice of medicine, providers should be mindful of potential scenarios, exercise methods to mitigate risk, and appreciate the utility of comprehensive naloxone access legislation in orchestrating a coordinated response to the opioid overdose epidemic.

KW - drug overdose

KW - legal liability

KW - Naloxone

KW - opioids

KW - public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958049725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958049725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/00952990.2015.1109648

DO - 10.3109/00952990.2015.1109648

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

JF - American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

SN - 0095-2990

ER -