Abstract
Distal coronary perforation is a rare, yet potentially lethal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Early recognition and treatment remains critical in preventing potentially life-threatening adverse outcomes, such as cardiac tamponade. The most commonly used strategies for treating distal perforation are fat and coil embolization. We present two cases of guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of coil vs. fat embolization.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 253-258 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions |
Volume | 89 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2017 |
Keywords
- coil embolization
- coronary perforation
- fat embolization
- percutaneous coronary intervention
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine