Maternal-infant interactions at one-year adjusted age in infants at low- and high-risk as newborns

Robert E. Lasky, Jon E. Tyson, Charles R. Rosenfeld, Norman F. Gant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To compare maternal-infant interactions in high- and low-risk groups, we observed infants who had required neonatal intensive care and otherwise similar infants with normal perinatal histories in a follow-up clinic at one year adjusted age. The developmental level as assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development was significantly lower for the high-risk infants than for the control infants at one year of age. Principal component analyses were used to define interaction patterns in each of five situations. Principal component analyses allow a more meaningful analysis of interrelated maternal and infant behaviors than do standard statistical analyses and minimize the likelihood of misleading 'significance' findings resulting from multiple comparisons. Prior to being examined, mothers of control infants were more likely to adopt an 'en face' position, play with, comfort, talk to, and smile at their infants than were mothers of high-risk infants. Control infants were more likely to smile in return. These differences between control and high-risk mother-infant dyads disappeared when the infants' developmental level was statistically controlled. Group differences in maternal-infant interactions independent of the infants' developmental level were observed in only one situation (collection of blood). Specific medical risk factors had little relation to findings at one year. Maternal-infant interaction should be interpreted in relation to the postconceptional and developmental age as well as the postnatal age of the infant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-152
Number of pages8
JournalEarly Human Development
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Mothers
Newborn Infant
Principal Component Analysis
Infant Behavior
Neonatal Intensive Care
Maternal Behavior
Child Development

Keywords

  • infant development
  • maternal-infant interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Maternal-infant interactions at one-year adjusted age in infants at low- and high-risk as newborns. / Lasky, Robert E.; Tyson, Jon E.; Rosenfeld, Charles R.; Gant, Norman F.

In: Early Human Development, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1984, p. 145-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25fb390ba8744bfaac3873b172d5a571,
title = "Maternal-infant interactions at one-year adjusted age in infants at low- and high-risk as newborns",
abstract = "To compare maternal-infant interactions in high- and low-risk groups, we observed infants who had required neonatal intensive care and otherwise similar infants with normal perinatal histories in a follow-up clinic at one year adjusted age. The developmental level as assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development was significantly lower for the high-risk infants than for the control infants at one year of age. Principal component analyses were used to define interaction patterns in each of five situations. Principal component analyses allow a more meaningful analysis of interrelated maternal and infant behaviors than do standard statistical analyses and minimize the likelihood of misleading 'significance' findings resulting from multiple comparisons. Prior to being examined, mothers of control infants were more likely to adopt an 'en face' position, play with, comfort, talk to, and smile at their infants than were mothers of high-risk infants. Control infants were more likely to smile in return. These differences between control and high-risk mother-infant dyads disappeared when the infants' developmental level was statistically controlled. Group differences in maternal-infant interactions independent of the infants' developmental level were observed in only one situation (collection of blood). Specific medical risk factors had little relation to findings at one year. Maternal-infant interaction should be interpreted in relation to the postconceptional and developmental age as well as the postnatal age of the infant.",
keywords = "infant development, maternal-infant interaction",
author = "Lasky, {Robert E.} and Tyson, {Jon E.} and Rosenfeld, {Charles R.} and Gant, {Norman F.}",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/0378-3782(84)90095-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "145--152",
journal = "Early Human Development",
issn = "0378-3782",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maternal-infant interactions at one-year adjusted age in infants at low- and high-risk as newborns

AU - Lasky, Robert E.

AU - Tyson, Jon E.

AU - Rosenfeld, Charles R.

AU - Gant, Norman F.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - To compare maternal-infant interactions in high- and low-risk groups, we observed infants who had required neonatal intensive care and otherwise similar infants with normal perinatal histories in a follow-up clinic at one year adjusted age. The developmental level as assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development was significantly lower for the high-risk infants than for the control infants at one year of age. Principal component analyses were used to define interaction patterns in each of five situations. Principal component analyses allow a more meaningful analysis of interrelated maternal and infant behaviors than do standard statistical analyses and minimize the likelihood of misleading 'significance' findings resulting from multiple comparisons. Prior to being examined, mothers of control infants were more likely to adopt an 'en face' position, play with, comfort, talk to, and smile at their infants than were mothers of high-risk infants. Control infants were more likely to smile in return. These differences between control and high-risk mother-infant dyads disappeared when the infants' developmental level was statistically controlled. Group differences in maternal-infant interactions independent of the infants' developmental level were observed in only one situation (collection of blood). Specific medical risk factors had little relation to findings at one year. Maternal-infant interaction should be interpreted in relation to the postconceptional and developmental age as well as the postnatal age of the infant.

AB - To compare maternal-infant interactions in high- and low-risk groups, we observed infants who had required neonatal intensive care and otherwise similar infants with normal perinatal histories in a follow-up clinic at one year adjusted age. The developmental level as assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development was significantly lower for the high-risk infants than for the control infants at one year of age. Principal component analyses were used to define interaction patterns in each of five situations. Principal component analyses allow a more meaningful analysis of interrelated maternal and infant behaviors than do standard statistical analyses and minimize the likelihood of misleading 'significance' findings resulting from multiple comparisons. Prior to being examined, mothers of control infants were more likely to adopt an 'en face' position, play with, comfort, talk to, and smile at their infants than were mothers of high-risk infants. Control infants were more likely to smile in return. These differences between control and high-risk mother-infant dyads disappeared when the infants' developmental level was statistically controlled. Group differences in maternal-infant interactions independent of the infants' developmental level were observed in only one situation (collection of blood). Specific medical risk factors had little relation to findings at one year. Maternal-infant interaction should be interpreted in relation to the postconceptional and developmental age as well as the postnatal age of the infant.

KW - infant development

KW - maternal-infant interaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021360344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021360344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0378-3782(84)90095-1

DO - 10.1016/0378-3782(84)90095-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 6714134

AN - SCOPUS:0021360344

VL - 9

SP - 145

EP - 152

JO - Early Human Development

JF - Early Human Development

SN - 0378-3782

IS - 2

ER -