Measurement of plantarflexor spasticity in traumatic brain injury: Correlational study of resistance torque compared with the modified Ashworth scale

Thiru Annaswamy, Srinivas Mallempati, Stephen C. Allison, Lawrence D. Abraham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the usefulness of a biomechanical measure, resistance torque (RT), in quantifying spasticity by comparing its use with a clinical scale, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and quantitative electrophysiological measures. DESIGN: This is a correlational study of spasticity measurements in 34 adults with traumatic brain injury and plantarflexor spasticity. Plantarflexor spasticity was measured in the seated position before and after cryotherapy using the MAS and also by strapping each subject's foot and ankle to an apparatus that provided a ramp and hold stretch. The quantitative measures were (1) reflex threshold angle (RTA) calculated through electromyographic signals and joint angle traces, (2) Hdorsiflexion (Hdf)/Hcontrol (Hctrl) amplitude ratio obtained through reciprocal inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, (3) Hvibration (Hvib)/Hctrl ratio obtained through vibratory inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, and (4) RT calculated as the time integral of the torque graph between the starting and ending pulses of the stretch. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between RT and MAS scores in both pre-ice (0.41) and post-ice trials (0.42) were fair (P = 0.001). The correlation coefficients between RT scores and RTA scores in both the pre-ice (0.66) and post-ice trials (0.75) were moderate (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: RT is a measure of the cumulative torque during an imposed stretch. The MAS is a subjective measure of the cumulative resistance perceived by the clinician during an imposed stretch. RT seems to be a fair quantitative correlate of the MAS in assessing spasticity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)404-411
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume86
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Torque
Ice
H-Reflex
Reflex
Architectural Accessibility
Cryotherapy
Traumatic Brain Injury
Posture
Ankle
Foot
Joints

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Brain Injury
  • Measurement
  • Reflex
  • Spasticity
  • Stretch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Measurement of plantarflexor spasticity in traumatic brain injury : Correlational study of resistance torque compared with the modified Ashworth scale. / Annaswamy, Thiru; Mallempati, Srinivas; Allison, Stephen C.; Abraham, Lawrence D.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 86, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 404-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ab078de467f4cb2a251154da5ae7e3e,
title = "Measurement of plantarflexor spasticity in traumatic brain injury: Correlational study of resistance torque compared with the modified Ashworth scale",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To examine the usefulness of a biomechanical measure, resistance torque (RT), in quantifying spasticity by comparing its use with a clinical scale, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and quantitative electrophysiological measures. DESIGN: This is a correlational study of spasticity measurements in 34 adults with traumatic brain injury and plantarflexor spasticity. Plantarflexor spasticity was measured in the seated position before and after cryotherapy using the MAS and also by strapping each subject's foot and ankle to an apparatus that provided a ramp and hold stretch. The quantitative measures were (1) reflex threshold angle (RTA) calculated through electromyographic signals and joint angle traces, (2) Hdorsiflexion (Hdf)/Hcontrol (Hctrl) amplitude ratio obtained through reciprocal inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, (3) Hvibration (Hvib)/Hctrl ratio obtained through vibratory inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, and (4) RT calculated as the time integral of the torque graph between the starting and ending pulses of the stretch. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between RT and MAS scores in both pre-ice (0.41) and post-ice trials (0.42) were fair (P = 0.001). The correlation coefficients between RT scores and RTA scores in both the pre-ice (0.66) and post-ice trials (0.75) were moderate (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: RT is a measure of the cumulative torque during an imposed stretch. The MAS is a subjective measure of the cumulative resistance perceived by the clinician during an imposed stretch. RT seems to be a fair quantitative correlate of the MAS in assessing spasticity.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Brain Injury, Measurement, Reflex, Spasticity, Stretch",
author = "Thiru Annaswamy and Srinivas Mallempati and Allison, {Stephen C.} and Abraham, {Lawrence D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/PHM.0b013e31804a7d85",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "404--411",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of plantarflexor spasticity in traumatic brain injury

T2 - Correlational study of resistance torque compared with the modified Ashworth scale

AU - Annaswamy, Thiru

AU - Mallempati, Srinivas

AU - Allison, Stephen C.

AU - Abraham, Lawrence D.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To examine the usefulness of a biomechanical measure, resistance torque (RT), in quantifying spasticity by comparing its use with a clinical scale, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and quantitative electrophysiological measures. DESIGN: This is a correlational study of spasticity measurements in 34 adults with traumatic brain injury and plantarflexor spasticity. Plantarflexor spasticity was measured in the seated position before and after cryotherapy using the MAS and also by strapping each subject's foot and ankle to an apparatus that provided a ramp and hold stretch. The quantitative measures were (1) reflex threshold angle (RTA) calculated through electromyographic signals and joint angle traces, (2) Hdorsiflexion (Hdf)/Hcontrol (Hctrl) amplitude ratio obtained through reciprocal inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, (3) Hvibration (Hvib)/Hctrl ratio obtained through vibratory inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, and (4) RT calculated as the time integral of the torque graph between the starting and ending pulses of the stretch. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between RT and MAS scores in both pre-ice (0.41) and post-ice trials (0.42) were fair (P = 0.001). The correlation coefficients between RT scores and RTA scores in both the pre-ice (0.66) and post-ice trials (0.75) were moderate (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: RT is a measure of the cumulative torque during an imposed stretch. The MAS is a subjective measure of the cumulative resistance perceived by the clinician during an imposed stretch. RT seems to be a fair quantitative correlate of the MAS in assessing spasticity.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To examine the usefulness of a biomechanical measure, resistance torque (RT), in quantifying spasticity by comparing its use with a clinical scale, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and quantitative electrophysiological measures. DESIGN: This is a correlational study of spasticity measurements in 34 adults with traumatic brain injury and plantarflexor spasticity. Plantarflexor spasticity was measured in the seated position before and after cryotherapy using the MAS and also by strapping each subject's foot and ankle to an apparatus that provided a ramp and hold stretch. The quantitative measures were (1) reflex threshold angle (RTA) calculated through electromyographic signals and joint angle traces, (2) Hdorsiflexion (Hdf)/Hcontrol (Hctrl) amplitude ratio obtained through reciprocal inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, (3) Hvibration (Hvib)/Hctrl ratio obtained through vibratory inhibition of the soleus H-reflex, and (4) RT calculated as the time integral of the torque graph between the starting and ending pulses of the stretch. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between RT and MAS scores in both pre-ice (0.41) and post-ice trials (0.42) were fair (P = 0.001). The correlation coefficients between RT scores and RTA scores in both the pre-ice (0.66) and post-ice trials (0.75) were moderate (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: RT is a measure of the cumulative torque during an imposed stretch. The MAS is a subjective measure of the cumulative resistance perceived by the clinician during an imposed stretch. RT seems to be a fair quantitative correlate of the MAS in assessing spasticity.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Brain Injury

KW - Measurement

KW - Reflex

KW - Spasticity

KW - Stretch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247523380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247523380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31804a7d85

DO - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31804a7d85

M3 - Article

C2 - 17449985

AN - SCOPUS:34247523380

VL - 86

SP - 404

EP - 411

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 5

ER -