Measuring health state preferences for hemophilia: Development of a disease-specific utility instrument

Joan Wasserman, L. A. Aday, C. E. Begley, C. Ahn, D. R. Lairson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Generic and disease-specific instruments have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in hemophilia. However, HRQoL measures also need to reflect patient preferences for various hemophilia health states. The goal of this project was to develop a disease-specific utility instrument that measures patient preferences for various health states unique to hemophilia. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG) methods were used. Study participants (n = 128) were tested and stratified into paediatric and adult groups. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated for both instruments, with r = 0.91 for the VAS and r = 0.79 for the SG.When comparing results by age group, statistically significant differences were observed between paediatric and adult participants with the SG instrument (P = 0.045), with older participants taking more risk overall. However, no significant differences based on age were seen when using the VAS (P = 0.636). Statistically significant differences were observed between the VAS and SG instruments within both the paediatric and adult groups (P < 0.0001). In general, the SG yielded higher preference scores than the VAS for the majority of health states. Results derived from the SG instrument indicate that age can influence patients' preferences regarding their state of health. This can have implications for considering treatment options based on the mean age of the population under consideration. Both instruments demonstrated reliability and validity indicating that they could be used to assess patient preferences in hemophilia. However, preference score differences indicate that the two measures may not be interchangeable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-57
Number of pages9
JournalHaemophilia
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Hemophilia A
Visual Analog Scale
Patient Preference
Health
Pediatrics
Reproducibility of Results
Quality of Life
Risk-Taking
Age Groups
Population

Keywords

  • Patient preferences
  • Standard gamble
  • Utility values
  • Visual analog scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Cite this

Measuring health state preferences for hemophilia : Development of a disease-specific utility instrument. / Wasserman, Joan; Aday, L. A.; Begley, C. E.; Ahn, C.; Lairson, D. R.

In: Haemophilia, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 49-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wasserman, Joan ; Aday, L. A. ; Begley, C. E. ; Ahn, C. ; Lairson, D. R. / Measuring health state preferences for hemophilia : Development of a disease-specific utility instrument. In: Haemophilia. 2005 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 49-57.
@article{b301b0fd4adb46429f7412578b1f8a34,
title = "Measuring health state preferences for hemophilia: Development of a disease-specific utility instrument",
abstract = "Generic and disease-specific instruments have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in hemophilia. However, HRQoL measures also need to reflect patient preferences for various hemophilia health states. The goal of this project was to develop a disease-specific utility instrument that measures patient preferences for various health states unique to hemophilia. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG) methods were used. Study participants (n = 128) were tested and stratified into paediatric and adult groups. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated for both instruments, with r = 0.91 for the VAS and r = 0.79 for the SG.When comparing results by age group, statistically significant differences were observed between paediatric and adult participants with the SG instrument (P = 0.045), with older participants taking more risk overall. However, no significant differences based on age were seen when using the VAS (P = 0.636). Statistically significant differences were observed between the VAS and SG instruments within both the paediatric and adult groups (P < 0.0001). In general, the SG yielded higher preference scores than the VAS for the majority of health states. Results derived from the SG instrument indicate that age can influence patients' preferences regarding their state of health. This can have implications for considering treatment options based on the mean age of the population under consideration. Both instruments demonstrated reliability and validity indicating that they could be used to assess patient preferences in hemophilia. However, preference score differences indicate that the two measures may not be interchangeable.",
keywords = "Patient preferences, Standard gamble, Utility values, Visual analog scale",
author = "Joan Wasserman and Aday, {L. A.} and Begley, {C. E.} and C. Ahn and Lairson, {D. R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01054.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "49--57",
journal = "Haemophilia",
issn = "1351-8216",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring health state preferences for hemophilia

T2 - Development of a disease-specific utility instrument

AU - Wasserman, Joan

AU - Aday, L. A.

AU - Begley, C. E.

AU - Ahn, C.

AU - Lairson, D. R.

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Generic and disease-specific instruments have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in hemophilia. However, HRQoL measures also need to reflect patient preferences for various hemophilia health states. The goal of this project was to develop a disease-specific utility instrument that measures patient preferences for various health states unique to hemophilia. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG) methods were used. Study participants (n = 128) were tested and stratified into paediatric and adult groups. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated for both instruments, with r = 0.91 for the VAS and r = 0.79 for the SG.When comparing results by age group, statistically significant differences were observed between paediatric and adult participants with the SG instrument (P = 0.045), with older participants taking more risk overall. However, no significant differences based on age were seen when using the VAS (P = 0.636). Statistically significant differences were observed between the VAS and SG instruments within both the paediatric and adult groups (P < 0.0001). In general, the SG yielded higher preference scores than the VAS for the majority of health states. Results derived from the SG instrument indicate that age can influence patients' preferences regarding their state of health. This can have implications for considering treatment options based on the mean age of the population under consideration. Both instruments demonstrated reliability and validity indicating that they could be used to assess patient preferences in hemophilia. However, preference score differences indicate that the two measures may not be interchangeable.

AB - Generic and disease-specific instruments have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in hemophilia. However, HRQoL measures also need to reflect patient preferences for various hemophilia health states. The goal of this project was to develop a disease-specific utility instrument that measures patient preferences for various health states unique to hemophilia. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG) methods were used. Study participants (n = 128) were tested and stratified into paediatric and adult groups. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated for both instruments, with r = 0.91 for the VAS and r = 0.79 for the SG.When comparing results by age group, statistically significant differences were observed between paediatric and adult participants with the SG instrument (P = 0.045), with older participants taking more risk overall. However, no significant differences based on age were seen when using the VAS (P = 0.636). Statistically significant differences were observed between the VAS and SG instruments within both the paediatric and adult groups (P < 0.0001). In general, the SG yielded higher preference scores than the VAS for the majority of health states. Results derived from the SG instrument indicate that age can influence patients' preferences regarding their state of health. This can have implications for considering treatment options based on the mean age of the population under consideration. Both instruments demonstrated reliability and validity indicating that they could be used to assess patient preferences in hemophilia. However, preference score differences indicate that the two measures may not be interchangeable.

KW - Patient preferences

KW - Standard gamble

KW - Utility values

KW - Visual analog scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844256413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844256413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01054.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01054.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15660989

AN - SCOPUS:13844256413

VL - 11

SP - 49

EP - 57

JO - Haemophilia

JF - Haemophilia

SN - 1351-8216

IS - 1

ER -