Mental health assessment in rehabilitation

A descriptive study through an international internet survey

Shannon B Juengst, Jan E. Nordvik, Ilkka S. Junttila, Jason Smith, Chung L. Kew, Tanja Laukkala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This cross-sectional study assessed international rehabilitation practitioners' views of mental health assessment (MHA), related specifically to assessment tools and needs in the field. We delivered an anonymous web-based survey capturing rehabilitation practioners' perspectives on MHA practices, assessment tools, and needs through the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine in the USA and through national rehabilitation networks in Finland and Norway. Altogether, 355 rehabilitation professionals answered the survey. Unmet MHA needs, most often attributed to insufficient time (112/269 responders), were recognized among rehabilitation professionals irrespective of the country of practice. When professional experience was weighed against barriers to conducting MHA, cost was statistically significantly linked to professional experience, with those with less experience viewing cost more as a barrier (P=0.019). Rehabilitation professionals from different professions, in different countries, and working with a variety of clinical populations recognize defined barriers to MHA in rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-372
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Internet
Mental Health
Rehabilitation
Needs Assessment
Surveys and Questionnaires
Finland
Norway
Health Care Costs
Cross-Sectional Studies
Medicine
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

Keywords

  • measurement tools
  • mental health assessment
  • rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Mental health assessment in rehabilitation : A descriptive study through an international internet survey. / Juengst, Shannon B; Nordvik, Jan E.; Junttila, Ilkka S.; Smith, Jason; Kew, Chung L.; Laukkala, Tanja.

In: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 368-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Juengst, Shannon B ; Nordvik, Jan E. ; Junttila, Ilkka S. ; Smith, Jason ; Kew, Chung L. ; Laukkala, Tanja. / Mental health assessment in rehabilitation : A descriptive study through an international internet survey. In: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 368-372.
@article{c370fb7c04bb4d01bea38a483f80df63,
title = "Mental health assessment in rehabilitation: A descriptive study through an international internet survey",
abstract = "This cross-sectional study assessed international rehabilitation practitioners' views of mental health assessment (MHA), related specifically to assessment tools and needs in the field. We delivered an anonymous web-based survey capturing rehabilitation practioners' perspectives on MHA practices, assessment tools, and needs through the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine in the USA and through national rehabilitation networks in Finland and Norway. Altogether, 355 rehabilitation professionals answered the survey. Unmet MHA needs, most often attributed to insufficient time (112/269 responders), were recognized among rehabilitation professionals irrespective of the country of practice. When professional experience was weighed against barriers to conducting MHA, cost was statistically significantly linked to professional experience, with those with less experience viewing cost more as a barrier (P=0.019). Rehabilitation professionals from different professions, in different countries, and working with a variety of clinical populations recognize defined barriers to MHA in rehabilitation.",
keywords = "measurement tools, mental health assessment, rehabilitation",
author = "Juengst, {Shannon B} and Nordvik, {Jan E.} and Junttila, {Ilkka S.} and Jason Smith and Kew, {Chung L.} and Tanja Laukkala",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MRR.0000000000000300",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "368--372",
journal = "International Journal of Rehabilitation Research",
issn = "0342-5282",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental health assessment in rehabilitation

T2 - A descriptive study through an international internet survey

AU - Juengst, Shannon B

AU - Nordvik, Jan E.

AU - Junttila, Ilkka S.

AU - Smith, Jason

AU - Kew, Chung L.

AU - Laukkala, Tanja

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - This cross-sectional study assessed international rehabilitation practitioners' views of mental health assessment (MHA), related specifically to assessment tools and needs in the field. We delivered an anonymous web-based survey capturing rehabilitation practioners' perspectives on MHA practices, assessment tools, and needs through the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine in the USA and through national rehabilitation networks in Finland and Norway. Altogether, 355 rehabilitation professionals answered the survey. Unmet MHA needs, most often attributed to insufficient time (112/269 responders), were recognized among rehabilitation professionals irrespective of the country of practice. When professional experience was weighed against barriers to conducting MHA, cost was statistically significantly linked to professional experience, with those with less experience viewing cost more as a barrier (P=0.019). Rehabilitation professionals from different professions, in different countries, and working with a variety of clinical populations recognize defined barriers to MHA in rehabilitation.

AB - This cross-sectional study assessed international rehabilitation practitioners' views of mental health assessment (MHA), related specifically to assessment tools and needs in the field. We delivered an anonymous web-based survey capturing rehabilitation practioners' perspectives on MHA practices, assessment tools, and needs through the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine in the USA and through national rehabilitation networks in Finland and Norway. Altogether, 355 rehabilitation professionals answered the survey. Unmet MHA needs, most often attributed to insufficient time (112/269 responders), were recognized among rehabilitation professionals irrespective of the country of practice. When professional experience was weighed against barriers to conducting MHA, cost was statistically significantly linked to professional experience, with those with less experience viewing cost more as a barrier (P=0.019). Rehabilitation professionals from different professions, in different countries, and working with a variety of clinical populations recognize defined barriers to MHA in rehabilitation.

KW - measurement tools

KW - mental health assessment

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056253417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056253417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000300

DO - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000300

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 368

EP - 372

JO - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

JF - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

SN - 0342-5282

IS - 4

ER -