Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy

John T. Maple, Subhas Banerjee, Bradley A. Barth, Yasser M. Bhat, David J. Desilets, Klaus T. Gottlieb, Patrick R. Pfau, Douglas K. Pleskow, Uzma D. Siddiqui, Jeffrey L. Tokar, Amy Wang, Louis Michel Wong Kee Song, Sarah A. Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported adverse events of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through February 2012 for relevant articles by using the key words "colonoscopy," "insufflation," "air," "carbon dioxide," and "water." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-525
Number of pages7
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Technology
Publications
MEDLINE
Radiologic Health
Governing Board
Databases
Insufflation
Controlled Clinical Trials
Expert Testimony
Advisory Committees
United States Food and Drug Administration
Standard of Care
PubMed
Carbon Dioxide
Endoscopy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Air
Equipment and Supplies
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Maple, J. T., Banerjee, S., Barth, B. A., Bhat, Y. M., Desilets, D. J., Gottlieb, K. T., ... Rodriguez, S. A. (2013). Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 77(4), 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025

Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy. / Maple, John T.; Banerjee, Subhas; Barth, Bradley A.; Bhat, Yasser M.; Desilets, David J.; Gottlieb, Klaus T.; Pfau, Patrick R.; Pleskow, Douglas K.; Siddiqui, Uzma D.; Tokar, Jeffrey L.; Wang, Amy; Song, Louis Michel Wong Kee; Rodriguez, Sarah A.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 77, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 519-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maple, JT, Banerjee, S, Barth, BA, Bhat, YM, Desilets, DJ, Gottlieb, KT, Pfau, PR, Pleskow, DK, Siddiqui, UD, Tokar, JL, Wang, A, Song, LMWK & Rodriguez, SA 2013, 'Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025
Maple JT, Banerjee S, Barth BA, Bhat YM, Desilets DJ, Gottlieb KT et al. Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013 Apr;77(4):519-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025
Maple, John T. ; Banerjee, Subhas ; Barth, Bradley A. ; Bhat, Yasser M. ; Desilets, David J. ; Gottlieb, Klaus T. ; Pfau, Patrick R. ; Pleskow, Douglas K. ; Siddiqui, Uzma D. ; Tokar, Jeffrey L. ; Wang, Amy ; Song, Louis Michel Wong Kee ; Rodriguez, Sarah A. / Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013 ; Vol. 77, No. 4. pp. 519-525.
@article{a02674cbd7b44371aa42a8f37cd7cc9f,
title = "Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy",
abstract = "The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported adverse events of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the {"}related articles{"} feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through February 2012 for relevant articles by using the key words {"}colonoscopy,{"} {"}insufflation,{"} {"}air,{"} {"}carbon dioxide,{"} and {"}water.{"} Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.",
author = "Maple, {John T.} and Subhas Banerjee and Barth, {Bradley A.} and Bhat, {Yasser M.} and Desilets, {David J.} and Gottlieb, {Klaus T.} and Pfau, {Patrick R.} and Pleskow, {Douglas K.} and Siddiqui, {Uzma D.} and Tokar, {Jeffrey L.} and Amy Wang and Song, {Louis Michel Wong Kee} and Rodriguez, {Sarah A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "519--525",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy

AU - Maple, John T.

AU - Banerjee, Subhas

AU - Barth, Bradley A.

AU - Bhat, Yasser M.

AU - Desilets, David J.

AU - Gottlieb, Klaus T.

AU - Pfau, Patrick R.

AU - Pleskow, Douglas K.

AU - Siddiqui, Uzma D.

AU - Tokar, Jeffrey L.

AU - Wang, Amy

AU - Song, Louis Michel Wong Kee

AU - Rodriguez, Sarah A.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported adverse events of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through February 2012 for relevant articles by using the key words "colonoscopy," "insufflation," "air," "carbon dioxide," and "water." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

AB - The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported adverse events of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through February 2012 for relevant articles by using the key words "colonoscopy," "insufflation," "air," "carbon dioxide," and "water." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875227091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875227091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 23415258

AN - SCOPUS:84875227091

VL - 77

SP - 519

EP - 525

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -