Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. Methods A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. Results Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. Discussion Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-214
Number of pages10
JournalHPB
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pancreatectomy
Patient Selection
Observational Studies
Brazil
Registries
Meta-Analysis
Pancreas
Length of Stay
Neoplasms
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (2017). Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. HPB, 19(3), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. / the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection.

In: HPB, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 205-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection 2017, 'Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy', HPB, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009
the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. HPB. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009
the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. / Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. In: HPB. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 205-214.
@article{87212f5906df4618a22323afc0a3f9ab,
title = "Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy",
abstract = "Background The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. Methods A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. Results Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. Discussion Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.",
author = "{the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection} and R{\o}sok, {B{\aa}rd I.} and {de Rooij}, Thijs and {van Hilst}, Jony and Diener, {Markus K.} and Allen, {Peter J.} and Vollmer, {Charles M.} and Kooby, {David A.} and Shrikhande, {Shailesh V.} and Asbun, {Horacio J.} and Jeffrey Barkun and Besselink, {Marc G.} and Ugo Boggi and Kevin Conlon and Han, {Ho Seong} and Paul Hansen and Kendrick, {Michael L.} and David Kooby and Montagnini, {Andre L.} and Chinnasamy Palanivelu and R{\o}sok, {B{\aa}rd I.} and Shrikhande, {Shailesh V.} and Vollmer, {Charles M.} and Go Wakabayashi and Zeh, {Herbert J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "205--214",
journal = "HPB",
issn = "1365-182X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

AU - the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection

AU - Røsok, Bård I.

AU - de Rooij, Thijs

AU - van Hilst, Jony

AU - Diener, Markus K.

AU - Allen, Peter J.

AU - Vollmer, Charles M.

AU - Kooby, David A.

AU - Shrikhande, Shailesh V.

AU - Asbun, Horacio J.

AU - Barkun, Jeffrey

AU - Besselink, Marc G.

AU - Boggi, Ugo

AU - Conlon, Kevin

AU - Han, Ho Seong

AU - Hansen, Paul

AU - Kendrick, Michael L.

AU - Kooby, David

AU - Montagnini, Andre L.

AU - Palanivelu, Chinnasamy

AU - Røsok, Bård I.

AU - Shrikhande, Shailesh V.

AU - Vollmer, Charles M.

AU - Wakabayashi, Go

AU - Zeh, Herbert J.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. Methods A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. Results Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. Discussion Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.

AB - Background The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. Methods A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. Results Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. Discussion Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012920025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012920025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28215903

AN - SCOPUS:85012920025

VL - 19

SP - 205

EP - 214

JO - HPB

JF - HPB

SN - 1365-182X

IS - 3

ER -