Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: Facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Approximately 60% of women who labour in the USA receive some form of neuraxial analgesia, but concerns have been raised regarding whether it negatively impacts the labour and delivery process. In this review, we attempt to clarify what has been established as truths, falsities and uncertainties regarding the effects of this form of pain relief on labour progression, negative and/or positive. Additionally, although the term 'epidural' has become synonymous with neuraxial analgesia, we discuss two other techniques, combined spinal-epidural and continuous spinal analgesia, that are gaining popularity, as well as their effects on labour progression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-293
Number of pages6
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Analgesia
Uncertainty
Pain

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • epidural
  • labour
  • neuraxial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

@article{181beb92bee641c4adb653b128f0a1e4,
title = "Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: Facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future",
abstract = "Approximately 60{\%} of women who labour in the USA receive some form of neuraxial analgesia, but concerns have been raised regarding whether it negatively impacts the labour and delivery process. In this review, we attempt to clarify what has been established as truths, falsities and uncertainties regarding the effects of this form of pain relief on labour progression, negative and/or positive. Additionally, although the term 'epidural' has become synonymous with neuraxial analgesia, we discuss two other techniques, combined spinal-epidural and continuous spinal analgesia, that are gaining popularity, as well as their effects on labour progression.",
keywords = "Analgesia, epidural, labour, neuraxial",
author = "Grant, {E. N.} and W. Tao and M. Craig and D. McIntire and K. Leveno",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.12966",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "288--293",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression

T2 - Facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future

AU - Grant, E. N.

AU - Tao, W.

AU - Craig, M.

AU - McIntire, D.

AU - Leveno, K.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Approximately 60% of women who labour in the USA receive some form of neuraxial analgesia, but concerns have been raised regarding whether it negatively impacts the labour and delivery process. In this review, we attempt to clarify what has been established as truths, falsities and uncertainties regarding the effects of this form of pain relief on labour progression, negative and/or positive. Additionally, although the term 'epidural' has become synonymous with neuraxial analgesia, we discuss two other techniques, combined spinal-epidural and continuous spinal analgesia, that are gaining popularity, as well as their effects on labour progression.

AB - Approximately 60% of women who labour in the USA receive some form of neuraxial analgesia, but concerns have been raised regarding whether it negatively impacts the labour and delivery process. In this review, we attempt to clarify what has been established as truths, falsities and uncertainties regarding the effects of this form of pain relief on labour progression, negative and/or positive. Additionally, although the term 'epidural' has become synonymous with neuraxial analgesia, we discuss two other techniques, combined spinal-epidural and continuous spinal analgesia, that are gaining popularity, as well as their effects on labour progression.

KW - Analgesia

KW - epidural

KW - labour

KW - neuraxial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922696341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922696341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.12966

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.12966

M3 - Article

C2 - 25088476

AN - SCOPUS:84922696341

VL - 122

SP - 288

EP - 293

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 3

ER -