Non-High-Density Lipoprotein and Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Their Risk Predictive Values in Coronary Heart Disease

Jian Liu, Christopher T. Sempos, Richard P. Donahue, Joan Dorn, Maurizio Trevisan, Scott M Grundy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

195 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine if non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a more useful predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk than low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and if very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol is an independent predictor of CHD risk, data from the Framingham Heart Study (2,693 men, 3,101 women) were used for this analysis. All subjects were aged ≥30 years and free of CHD at baseline, and incident CHD was the end point (618 men, 372 women). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the risk for CHD (relative risks and 95% confidence intervals) on the basis of the joint distribution of LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol (in milligrams per deciliter), as well as LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and VLDL cholesterol as continuous variables. After multivariate adjustment, within non-HDL cholesterol level, no association was found between LDL cholesterol and the risk for CHD, whereas within LDL cholesterol levels, a strong positive and graded association between non-HDL cholesterol and risk for CHD was observed. When the analysis was repeated within triglyceride levels (<200 vs ≥200 mg/dl), the risk pattern did not change significantly. Also, VLDL cholesterol was found to be a significant predictor of CHD risk after adjusting for LDL cholesterol at triglyceride levels of ≥200 or <200 mg/dl. In conclusion, these results suggest that non-HDL cholesterol level is a stronger predictor of CHD risk than LDL cholesterol; that is, VLDL cholesterol may play a critical role in the development of CHD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1363-1368
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume98
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2006

Fingerprint

VLDL Cholesterol
Lipoproteins
Coronary Disease
LDL Cholesterol
Triglycerides
Proportional Hazards Models
lipoprotein cholesterol
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Non-High-Density Lipoprotein and Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Their Risk Predictive Values in Coronary Heart Disease. / Liu, Jian; Sempos, Christopher T.; Donahue, Richard P.; Dorn, Joan; Trevisan, Maurizio; Grundy, Scott M.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 98, No. 10, 15.11.2006, p. 1363-1368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liu, Jian ; Sempos, Christopher T. ; Donahue, Richard P. ; Dorn, Joan ; Trevisan, Maurizio ; Grundy, Scott M. / Non-High-Density Lipoprotein and Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Their Risk Predictive Values in Coronary Heart Disease. In: American Journal of Cardiology. 2006 ; Vol. 98, No. 10. pp. 1363-1368.
@article{eb0fbfdcdd914903bf7e6ad1458e20e0,
title = "Non-High-Density Lipoprotein and Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Their Risk Predictive Values in Coronary Heart Disease",
abstract = "To determine if non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a more useful predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk than low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and if very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol is an independent predictor of CHD risk, data from the Framingham Heart Study (2,693 men, 3,101 women) were used for this analysis. All subjects were aged ≥30 years and free of CHD at baseline, and incident CHD was the end point (618 men, 372 women). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the risk for CHD (relative risks and 95{\%} confidence intervals) on the basis of the joint distribution of LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol (in milligrams per deciliter), as well as LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and VLDL cholesterol as continuous variables. After multivariate adjustment, within non-HDL cholesterol level, no association was found between LDL cholesterol and the risk for CHD, whereas within LDL cholesterol levels, a strong positive and graded association between non-HDL cholesterol and risk for CHD was observed. When the analysis was repeated within triglyceride levels (<200 vs ≥200 mg/dl), the risk pattern did not change significantly. Also, VLDL cholesterol was found to be a significant predictor of CHD risk after adjusting for LDL cholesterol at triglyceride levels of ≥200 or <200 mg/dl. In conclusion, these results suggest that non-HDL cholesterol level is a stronger predictor of CHD risk than LDL cholesterol; that is, VLDL cholesterol may play a critical role in the development of CHD.",
author = "Jian Liu and Sempos, {Christopher T.} and Donahue, {Richard P.} and Joan Dorn and Maurizio Trevisan and Grundy, {Scott M}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "1363--1368",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-High-Density Lipoprotein and Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Their Risk Predictive Values in Coronary Heart Disease

AU - Liu, Jian

AU - Sempos, Christopher T.

AU - Donahue, Richard P.

AU - Dorn, Joan

AU - Trevisan, Maurizio

AU - Grundy, Scott M

PY - 2006/11/15

Y1 - 2006/11/15

N2 - To determine if non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a more useful predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk than low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and if very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol is an independent predictor of CHD risk, data from the Framingham Heart Study (2,693 men, 3,101 women) were used for this analysis. All subjects were aged ≥30 years and free of CHD at baseline, and incident CHD was the end point (618 men, 372 women). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the risk for CHD (relative risks and 95% confidence intervals) on the basis of the joint distribution of LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol (in milligrams per deciliter), as well as LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and VLDL cholesterol as continuous variables. After multivariate adjustment, within non-HDL cholesterol level, no association was found between LDL cholesterol and the risk for CHD, whereas within LDL cholesterol levels, a strong positive and graded association between non-HDL cholesterol and risk for CHD was observed. When the analysis was repeated within triglyceride levels (<200 vs ≥200 mg/dl), the risk pattern did not change significantly. Also, VLDL cholesterol was found to be a significant predictor of CHD risk after adjusting for LDL cholesterol at triglyceride levels of ≥200 or <200 mg/dl. In conclusion, these results suggest that non-HDL cholesterol level is a stronger predictor of CHD risk than LDL cholesterol; that is, VLDL cholesterol may play a critical role in the development of CHD.

AB - To determine if non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a more useful predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk than low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and if very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol is an independent predictor of CHD risk, data from the Framingham Heart Study (2,693 men, 3,101 women) were used for this analysis. All subjects were aged ≥30 years and free of CHD at baseline, and incident CHD was the end point (618 men, 372 women). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the risk for CHD (relative risks and 95% confidence intervals) on the basis of the joint distribution of LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol (in milligrams per deciliter), as well as LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and VLDL cholesterol as continuous variables. After multivariate adjustment, within non-HDL cholesterol level, no association was found between LDL cholesterol and the risk for CHD, whereas within LDL cholesterol levels, a strong positive and graded association between non-HDL cholesterol and risk for CHD was observed. When the analysis was repeated within triglyceride levels (<200 vs ≥200 mg/dl), the risk pattern did not change significantly. Also, VLDL cholesterol was found to be a significant predictor of CHD risk after adjusting for LDL cholesterol at triglyceride levels of ≥200 or <200 mg/dl. In conclusion, these results suggest that non-HDL cholesterol level is a stronger predictor of CHD risk than LDL cholesterol; that is, VLDL cholesterol may play a critical role in the development of CHD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750527116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750527116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.032

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.032

M3 - Article

C2 - 17134630

AN - SCOPUS:33750527116

VL - 98

SP - 1363

EP - 1368

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 10

ER -