Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Outcomes and Predictors of Complications

Sergio Huerta, Corey Timmerman, Madison Argo, Juan Favela, Thai H Pham, Sachin S Kukreja, Jingsheng Yan, Hong Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The robotic approach to an inguinal hernia has not been compared head to head with the open and laparoscopic techniques in randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, long-term outcomes for robotic inguinal hernia repair (RHR) are lacking. In this study, we compared laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) and RHR with open inguinal hernia repair (OHR) in veteran patients performed by surgeons most familiar with each approach. Methods: A retrospective single-institution analysis of 1299 inguinal hernia repairs performed at the VA North Texas Health Care System between 2005 and 2017 was undertaken. Three surgeons performed the operations, each an expert in one approach, and there was no crossover in techniques. A total of 1100 OHRs, 128 LHRs, and 71 RHRs were performed. Univariable analysis was undertaken to determine associations between techniques and outcomes (OHR versus LHR; OHR versus RHR; LHR versus RHR). Setting complications as a dependent variable, multivariable analyses were undertaken to determine an association with complications as well as independent predictors of complications. Results: Patient demographics were similar among groups except for age that was higher in the OHR cohort. The average follow-up was 5.2 ± 3.4 y. In the present report, recurrence was associated with a higher rate in the RHR versus OHR (5.6% versus 1.7%; P < 0.02), but not in the LHR versus OHR (3.9% versus 1.9%; P = 0.09). Inguinodynia was more likely to occur in both the LHR and RHR compared with the OHR (9.4% and 14.1 versus 1.5%; both P's < 0.001). Urinary retention was also more common in the LHR and RHR than in the OHR (5.5% and 5.6% versus 1.8%, both P's < 0.05) as was the rate of overall complications (34.4% and 38.0% versus 11.2%, both P's < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed femoral hernias, ASA, serum albumin, operative room time, a recurrent hernia, and the minimally invasive approaches were independent predictors of overall complications. Conclusions: Outcomes in the OHR cohort were, in general, superior compared with both the LHR and RHR. However, these strategies should be viewed as complementary. The best approach to an inguinal hernia repair rests on the specific expertise of the surgeon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-127
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume241
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Inguinal Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Robotics

Keywords

  • Bassini repair
  • Hernia recurrence
  • Inguinodynia
  • McVay repair
  • Shouldice repair

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair : Outcomes and Predictors of Complications. / Huerta, Sergio; Timmerman, Corey; Argo, Madison; Favela, Juan; Pham, Thai H; Kukreja, Sachin S; Yan, Jingsheng; Zhu, Hong.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 241, 01.09.2019, p. 119-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d178675cbcb453b83c0abe4276e6909,
title = "Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Predictors of Complications",
abstract = "Background: The robotic approach to an inguinal hernia has not been compared head to head with the open and laparoscopic techniques in randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, long-term outcomes for robotic inguinal hernia repair (RHR) are lacking. In this study, we compared laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) and RHR with open inguinal hernia repair (OHR) in veteran patients performed by surgeons most familiar with each approach. Methods: A retrospective single-institution analysis of 1299 inguinal hernia repairs performed at the VA North Texas Health Care System between 2005 and 2017 was undertaken. Three surgeons performed the operations, each an expert in one approach, and there was no crossover in techniques. A total of 1100 OHRs, 128 LHRs, and 71 RHRs were performed. Univariable analysis was undertaken to determine associations between techniques and outcomes (OHR versus LHR; OHR versus RHR; LHR versus RHR). Setting complications as a dependent variable, multivariable analyses were undertaken to determine an association with complications as well as independent predictors of complications. Results: Patient demographics were similar among groups except for age that was higher in the OHR cohort. The average follow-up was 5.2 ± 3.4 y. In the present report, recurrence was associated with a higher rate in the RHR versus OHR (5.6{\%} versus 1.7{\%}; P < 0.02), but not in the LHR versus OHR (3.9{\%} versus 1.9{\%}; P = 0.09). Inguinodynia was more likely to occur in both the LHR and RHR compared with the OHR (9.4{\%} and 14.1 versus 1.5{\%}; both P's < 0.001). Urinary retention was also more common in the LHR and RHR than in the OHR (5.5{\%} and 5.6{\%} versus 1.8{\%}, both P's < 0.05) as was the rate of overall complications (34.4{\%} and 38.0{\%} versus 11.2{\%}, both P's < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed femoral hernias, ASA, serum albumin, operative room time, a recurrent hernia, and the minimally invasive approaches were independent predictors of overall complications. Conclusions: Outcomes in the OHR cohort were, in general, superior compared with both the LHR and RHR. However, these strategies should be viewed as complementary. The best approach to an inguinal hernia repair rests on the specific expertise of the surgeon.",
keywords = "Bassini repair, Hernia recurrence, Inguinodynia, McVay repair, Shouldice repair",
author = "Sergio Huerta and Corey Timmerman and Madison Argo and Juan Favela and Pham, {Thai H} and Kukreja, {Sachin S} and Jingsheng Yan and Hong Zhu",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "241",
pages = "119--127",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair

T2 - Outcomes and Predictors of Complications

AU - Huerta, Sergio

AU - Timmerman, Corey

AU - Argo, Madison

AU - Favela, Juan

AU - Pham, Thai H

AU - Kukreja, Sachin S

AU - Yan, Jingsheng

AU - Zhu, Hong

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Background: The robotic approach to an inguinal hernia has not been compared head to head with the open and laparoscopic techniques in randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, long-term outcomes for robotic inguinal hernia repair (RHR) are lacking. In this study, we compared laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) and RHR with open inguinal hernia repair (OHR) in veteran patients performed by surgeons most familiar with each approach. Methods: A retrospective single-institution analysis of 1299 inguinal hernia repairs performed at the VA North Texas Health Care System between 2005 and 2017 was undertaken. Three surgeons performed the operations, each an expert in one approach, and there was no crossover in techniques. A total of 1100 OHRs, 128 LHRs, and 71 RHRs were performed. Univariable analysis was undertaken to determine associations between techniques and outcomes (OHR versus LHR; OHR versus RHR; LHR versus RHR). Setting complications as a dependent variable, multivariable analyses were undertaken to determine an association with complications as well as independent predictors of complications. Results: Patient demographics were similar among groups except for age that was higher in the OHR cohort. The average follow-up was 5.2 ± 3.4 y. In the present report, recurrence was associated with a higher rate in the RHR versus OHR (5.6% versus 1.7%; P < 0.02), but not in the LHR versus OHR (3.9% versus 1.9%; P = 0.09). Inguinodynia was more likely to occur in both the LHR and RHR compared with the OHR (9.4% and 14.1 versus 1.5%; both P's < 0.001). Urinary retention was also more common in the LHR and RHR than in the OHR (5.5% and 5.6% versus 1.8%, both P's < 0.05) as was the rate of overall complications (34.4% and 38.0% versus 11.2%, both P's < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed femoral hernias, ASA, serum albumin, operative room time, a recurrent hernia, and the minimally invasive approaches were independent predictors of overall complications. Conclusions: Outcomes in the OHR cohort were, in general, superior compared with both the LHR and RHR. However, these strategies should be viewed as complementary. The best approach to an inguinal hernia repair rests on the specific expertise of the surgeon.

AB - Background: The robotic approach to an inguinal hernia has not been compared head to head with the open and laparoscopic techniques in randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, long-term outcomes for robotic inguinal hernia repair (RHR) are lacking. In this study, we compared laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) and RHR with open inguinal hernia repair (OHR) in veteran patients performed by surgeons most familiar with each approach. Methods: A retrospective single-institution analysis of 1299 inguinal hernia repairs performed at the VA North Texas Health Care System between 2005 and 2017 was undertaken. Three surgeons performed the operations, each an expert in one approach, and there was no crossover in techniques. A total of 1100 OHRs, 128 LHRs, and 71 RHRs were performed. Univariable analysis was undertaken to determine associations between techniques and outcomes (OHR versus LHR; OHR versus RHR; LHR versus RHR). Setting complications as a dependent variable, multivariable analyses were undertaken to determine an association with complications as well as independent predictors of complications. Results: Patient demographics were similar among groups except for age that was higher in the OHR cohort. The average follow-up was 5.2 ± 3.4 y. In the present report, recurrence was associated with a higher rate in the RHR versus OHR (5.6% versus 1.7%; P < 0.02), but not in the LHR versus OHR (3.9% versus 1.9%; P = 0.09). Inguinodynia was more likely to occur in both the LHR and RHR compared with the OHR (9.4% and 14.1 versus 1.5%; both P's < 0.001). Urinary retention was also more common in the LHR and RHR than in the OHR (5.5% and 5.6% versus 1.8%, both P's < 0.05) as was the rate of overall complications (34.4% and 38.0% versus 11.2%, both P's < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed femoral hernias, ASA, serum albumin, operative room time, a recurrent hernia, and the minimally invasive approaches were independent predictors of overall complications. Conclusions: Outcomes in the OHR cohort were, in general, superior compared with both the LHR and RHR. However, these strategies should be viewed as complementary. The best approach to an inguinal hernia repair rests on the specific expertise of the surgeon.

KW - Bassini repair

KW - Hernia recurrence

KW - Inguinodynia

KW - McVay repair

KW - Shouldice repair

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064467979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064467979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046

M3 - Article

VL - 241

SP - 119

EP - 127

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

ER -