Oral trovafloxacin compared with intravenous cefoxitin in the prevention of bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease

Subir Roy, David Hemsell, Stephen Gordon, David Godwin, Mark Pearlman, David Luke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trovafloxacin is a new fourth-generation fluoroquinolone whose pharmacokinetics and in vitro activity suggest that it is well suited for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective hysterectomy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, parallel groups of women 18 years of age or older received either 200 mg trovafloxacin by mouth and intravenous (IV) placebo or 2 g cefoxitin by IV infusion and placebo by mouth before elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease. RESULTS: In the 103 and 97 patients in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin groups, respectively, who were evaluable for efficacy, the prophylactic success rates at hospital discharge (96% in both groups) and 30 ± 6 days after hysterectomy (88% and 91% in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin groups, respectively) were statistically equivalent. Both antibiotics were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A single oral 200 mg dose of trovafloxacin is as effective and safe as a standard cefoxitin parenteral regimen in the prevention of primary bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62S-66S
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume176
Issue number6 A
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oral trovafloxacin compared with intravenous cefoxitin in the prevention of bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this