Participating in multicenter randomized controlled trials: What's the relative value?

Paul Tornetta, Mandy Pascual, Katelyn Godin, Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The value of high-quality, large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedic surgery is becoming well recognized; however, the efforts of investigators participating in RCTs are often underappreciated in areas such as academic merit. Within this manuscript, we discuss how involvement in a large-scale RCT can lead to benefits, such as improvements to clinical practice and decision-making as well as personal incentives. We also examined how investigators' contributions to large multicenter RCTs are perceived and recognized by academic promotion committees. We found that academic promotion committees undervalue contributions to multicenter RCTs as compared with participation in studies that offer lower levels of evidence. The culture of academic promotion needs to evolve to ensure that participation in large multicenter RCTs is appropriately valued by these committees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-111
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume94
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 18 2012

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Orthopedics
Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Participating in multicenter randomized controlled trials : What's the relative value? / Tornetta, Paul; Pascual, Mandy; Godin, Katelyn; Sprague, Sheila; Bhandari, Mohit.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 94, No. SUPPL. 1, 18.07.2012, p. 107-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tornetta, Paul ; Pascual, Mandy ; Godin, Katelyn ; Sprague, Sheila ; Bhandari, Mohit. / Participating in multicenter randomized controlled trials : What's the relative value?. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2012 ; Vol. 94, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 107-111.
@article{fa47453f434640a2a83346629e7787f3,
title = "Participating in multicenter randomized controlled trials: What's the relative value?",
abstract = "The value of high-quality, large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedic surgery is becoming well recognized; however, the efforts of investigators participating in RCTs are often underappreciated in areas such as academic merit. Within this manuscript, we discuss how involvement in a large-scale RCT can lead to benefits, such as improvements to clinical practice and decision-making as well as personal incentives. We also examined how investigators' contributions to large multicenter RCTs are perceived and recognized by academic promotion committees. We found that academic promotion committees undervalue contributions to multicenter RCTs as compared with participation in studies that offer lower levels of evidence. The culture of academic promotion needs to evolve to ensure that participation in large multicenter RCTs is appropriately valued by these committees.",
author = "Paul Tornetta and Mandy Pascual and Katelyn Godin and Sheila Sprague and Mohit Bhandari",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "18",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.L.00299",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "107--111",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participating in multicenter randomized controlled trials

T2 - What's the relative value?

AU - Tornetta, Paul

AU - Pascual, Mandy

AU - Godin, Katelyn

AU - Sprague, Sheila

AU - Bhandari, Mohit

PY - 2012/7/18

Y1 - 2012/7/18

N2 - The value of high-quality, large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedic surgery is becoming well recognized; however, the efforts of investigators participating in RCTs are often underappreciated in areas such as academic merit. Within this manuscript, we discuss how involvement in a large-scale RCT can lead to benefits, such as improvements to clinical practice and decision-making as well as personal incentives. We also examined how investigators' contributions to large multicenter RCTs are perceived and recognized by academic promotion committees. We found that academic promotion committees undervalue contributions to multicenter RCTs as compared with participation in studies that offer lower levels of evidence. The culture of academic promotion needs to evolve to ensure that participation in large multicenter RCTs is appropriately valued by these committees.

AB - The value of high-quality, large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedic surgery is becoming well recognized; however, the efforts of investigators participating in RCTs are often underappreciated in areas such as academic merit. Within this manuscript, we discuss how involvement in a large-scale RCT can lead to benefits, such as improvements to clinical practice and decision-making as well as personal incentives. We also examined how investigators' contributions to large multicenter RCTs are perceived and recognized by academic promotion committees. We found that academic promotion committees undervalue contributions to multicenter RCTs as compared with participation in studies that offer lower levels of evidence. The culture of academic promotion needs to evolve to ensure that participation in large multicenter RCTs is appropriately valued by these committees.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866950798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866950798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.L.00299

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.L.00299

M3 - Article

C2 - 22810459

AN - SCOPUS:84866950798

VL - 94

SP - 107

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -