Perioperative management of outpatients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly being placed in patients worldwide. These patients pose significant perioperative challenges and are at an increased risk of complications; the suitability of ambulatory surgery in this patient population remains controversial. The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential challenges and optimal perioperative care of patients with an ICD. Recent findings The American Society of Anesthesiologists Advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices as well as the American College of Cardiologists/American Heart Association guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery recommend that the tachyarrhythmia treatment algorithms of the ICD should be programmed off prior to surgery. However, these recommendations contradict those by the manufacturers and recent reports probably because they are based on data on early generation ICDs. Improvement in ICD technology and better understanding of ICD functions and awareness of potential electromagnetic interference-related problems can reduce ICD-related complications, and improve perioperative safety. Summary Anesthesia practitioners involved in the care of patients with ICDs should familiarize themselves with the response to magnets application on ICD function as well as understand the situations in which magnet use is not advisable. Perioperative communication with the patient's cardiologist and surgeon is critical in reducing adverse outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-704
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Outpatients
Magnets
Perioperative Care
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Tachycardia
Patient Care
Anesthesia
Communication
Guidelines
Technology
Safety
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Ambulatory surgery
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
  • Perioperative management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Perioperative management of outpatients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. / Joshi, Girish P.

In: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Vol. 22, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 701-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96e41ffd08b94fea8e30b7277bcdd87c,
title = "Perioperative management of outpatients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators",
abstract = "Purpose of review Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly being placed in patients worldwide. These patients pose significant perioperative challenges and are at an increased risk of complications; the suitability of ambulatory surgery in this patient population remains controversial. The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential challenges and optimal perioperative care of patients with an ICD. Recent findings The American Society of Anesthesiologists Advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices as well as the American College of Cardiologists/American Heart Association guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery recommend that the tachyarrhythmia treatment algorithms of the ICD should be programmed off prior to surgery. However, these recommendations contradict those by the manufacturers and recent reports probably because they are based on data on early generation ICDs. Improvement in ICD technology and better understanding of ICD functions and awareness of potential electromagnetic interference-related problems can reduce ICD-related complications, and improve perioperative safety. Summary Anesthesia practitioners involved in the care of patients with ICDs should familiarize themselves with the response to magnets application on ICD function as well as understand the situations in which magnet use is not advisable. Perioperative communication with the patient's cardiologist and surgeon is critical in reducing adverse outcome.",
keywords = "Ambulatory surgery, Implantable cardioverter defibrillators, Perioperative management",
author = "Joshi, {Girish P.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833189a0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "701--704",
journal = "Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology",
issn = "0952-7907",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perioperative management of outpatients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

AU - Joshi, Girish P.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Purpose of review Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly being placed in patients worldwide. These patients pose significant perioperative challenges and are at an increased risk of complications; the suitability of ambulatory surgery in this patient population remains controversial. The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential challenges and optimal perioperative care of patients with an ICD. Recent findings The American Society of Anesthesiologists Advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices as well as the American College of Cardiologists/American Heart Association guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery recommend that the tachyarrhythmia treatment algorithms of the ICD should be programmed off prior to surgery. However, these recommendations contradict those by the manufacturers and recent reports probably because they are based on data on early generation ICDs. Improvement in ICD technology and better understanding of ICD functions and awareness of potential electromagnetic interference-related problems can reduce ICD-related complications, and improve perioperative safety. Summary Anesthesia practitioners involved in the care of patients with ICDs should familiarize themselves with the response to magnets application on ICD function as well as understand the situations in which magnet use is not advisable. Perioperative communication with the patient's cardiologist and surgeon is critical in reducing adverse outcome.

AB - Purpose of review Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly being placed in patients worldwide. These patients pose significant perioperative challenges and are at an increased risk of complications; the suitability of ambulatory surgery in this patient population remains controversial. The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential challenges and optimal perioperative care of patients with an ICD. Recent findings The American Society of Anesthesiologists Advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices as well as the American College of Cardiologists/American Heart Association guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery recommend that the tachyarrhythmia treatment algorithms of the ICD should be programmed off prior to surgery. However, these recommendations contradict those by the manufacturers and recent reports probably because they are based on data on early generation ICDs. Improvement in ICD technology and better understanding of ICD functions and awareness of potential electromagnetic interference-related problems can reduce ICD-related complications, and improve perioperative safety. Summary Anesthesia practitioners involved in the care of patients with ICDs should familiarize themselves with the response to magnets application on ICD function as well as understand the situations in which magnet use is not advisable. Perioperative communication with the patient's cardiologist and surgeon is critical in reducing adverse outcome.

KW - Ambulatory surgery

KW - Implantable cardioverter defibrillators

KW - Perioperative management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449469690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449469690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833189a0

DO - 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833189a0

M3 - Article

C2 - 19713835

AN - SCOPUS:70449469690

VL - 22

SP - 701

EP - 704

JO - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

JF - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

SN - 0952-7907

IS - 6

ER -