Perioperative morbidity in posterior cranial vault expansion: Distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy

Jesse A. Taylor, Christopher A. Derderian, Scott P. Bartlett, John E. Fiadjoe, Emily M. Sussman, Paul A. Stricker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The treatment of multisuture syndromic craniosynostosis is in evolution, with an increasing prevalence of reports on posterior vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis over conventional osteotomy. The purported benefits of distraction osteogenesis include less perioperative morbidity. The authors conducted this preliminary study to compare the perioperative course in children undergoing posterior cranial vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy. Methods: A query was performed of the authors' institutional review board approved, prospective, craniofacial registry for posterior cranial expansion between 2008 and 2011. Data collected included age, weight, diagnosis, surgical procedure and duration, perioperative laboratory data, number of perioperative blood donor exposures, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data for conventional osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis were then compared. Results: The registry query returned data from 25 subjects (16 with conventional osteotomy and nine with distraction osteogenesis). There were no significant differences in age or weight between the two groups. Mean total surgery time for conventional osteotomy was 239 ± 48 minutes versus 200 ± 70 minutes for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.11). Intensive care unit stay was a median of 3.5 days with conventional osteotomy versus 4.0 days for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in median hospital length of stay, calculated blood loss in blood volumes, total perioperative blood donor exposures, intraoperative complications, or postoperative complications. Conclusions: The results from this review of the authors' early experience with posterior vault distraction osteogenesis suggest that distraction osteogenesis and conventional osteotomy have similar perioperative safety and morbidity profiles. These data may seem counterintuitive, and the perioperative course of children undergoing distraction osteogenesis is likely to improve as experience with distraction osteogenesis increases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume129
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Distraction Osteogenesis
Osteotomy
Morbidity
Length of Stay
Intraoperative Complications
Blood Donors
Intensive Care Units
Registries
Weights and Measures
Craniosynostoses
Research Ethics Committees
Blood Volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Perioperative morbidity in posterior cranial vault expansion : Distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy. / Taylor, Jesse A.; Derderian, Christopher A.; Bartlett, Scott P.; Fiadjoe, John E.; Sussman, Emily M.; Stricker, Paul A.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 129, No. 4, 04.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor, Jesse A. ; Derderian, Christopher A. ; Bartlett, Scott P. ; Fiadjoe, John E. ; Sussman, Emily M. ; Stricker, Paul A. / Perioperative morbidity in posterior cranial vault expansion : Distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 129, No. 4.
@article{fac1600251bb4963976b291a4260f8ac,
title = "Perioperative morbidity in posterior cranial vault expansion: Distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy",
abstract = "Background: The treatment of multisuture syndromic craniosynostosis is in evolution, with an increasing prevalence of reports on posterior vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis over conventional osteotomy. The purported benefits of distraction osteogenesis include less perioperative morbidity. The authors conducted this preliminary study to compare the perioperative course in children undergoing posterior cranial vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy. Methods: A query was performed of the authors' institutional review board approved, prospective, craniofacial registry for posterior cranial expansion between 2008 and 2011. Data collected included age, weight, diagnosis, surgical procedure and duration, perioperative laboratory data, number of perioperative blood donor exposures, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data for conventional osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis were then compared. Results: The registry query returned data from 25 subjects (16 with conventional osteotomy and nine with distraction osteogenesis). There were no significant differences in age or weight between the two groups. Mean total surgery time for conventional osteotomy was 239 ± 48 minutes versus 200 ± 70 minutes for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.11). Intensive care unit stay was a median of 3.5 days with conventional osteotomy versus 4.0 days for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in median hospital length of stay, calculated blood loss in blood volumes, total perioperative blood donor exposures, intraoperative complications, or postoperative complications. Conclusions: The results from this review of the authors' early experience with posterior vault distraction osteogenesis suggest that distraction osteogenesis and conventional osteotomy have similar perioperative safety and morbidity profiles. These data may seem counterintuitive, and the perioperative course of children undergoing distraction osteogenesis is likely to improve as experience with distraction osteogenesis increases.",
author = "Taylor, {Jesse A.} and Derderian, {Christopher A.} and Bartlett, {Scott P.} and Fiadjoe, {John E.} and Sussman, {Emily M.} and Stricker, {Paul A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182443164",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perioperative morbidity in posterior cranial vault expansion

T2 - Distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy

AU - Taylor, Jesse A.

AU - Derderian, Christopher A.

AU - Bartlett, Scott P.

AU - Fiadjoe, John E.

AU - Sussman, Emily M.

AU - Stricker, Paul A.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Background: The treatment of multisuture syndromic craniosynostosis is in evolution, with an increasing prevalence of reports on posterior vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis over conventional osteotomy. The purported benefits of distraction osteogenesis include less perioperative morbidity. The authors conducted this preliminary study to compare the perioperative course in children undergoing posterior cranial vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy. Methods: A query was performed of the authors' institutional review board approved, prospective, craniofacial registry for posterior cranial expansion between 2008 and 2011. Data collected included age, weight, diagnosis, surgical procedure and duration, perioperative laboratory data, number of perioperative blood donor exposures, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data for conventional osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis were then compared. Results: The registry query returned data from 25 subjects (16 with conventional osteotomy and nine with distraction osteogenesis). There were no significant differences in age or weight between the two groups. Mean total surgery time for conventional osteotomy was 239 ± 48 minutes versus 200 ± 70 minutes for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.11). Intensive care unit stay was a median of 3.5 days with conventional osteotomy versus 4.0 days for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in median hospital length of stay, calculated blood loss in blood volumes, total perioperative blood donor exposures, intraoperative complications, or postoperative complications. Conclusions: The results from this review of the authors' early experience with posterior vault distraction osteogenesis suggest that distraction osteogenesis and conventional osteotomy have similar perioperative safety and morbidity profiles. These data may seem counterintuitive, and the perioperative course of children undergoing distraction osteogenesis is likely to improve as experience with distraction osteogenesis increases.

AB - Background: The treatment of multisuture syndromic craniosynostosis is in evolution, with an increasing prevalence of reports on posterior vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis over conventional osteotomy. The purported benefits of distraction osteogenesis include less perioperative morbidity. The authors conducted this preliminary study to compare the perioperative course in children undergoing posterior cranial vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy. Methods: A query was performed of the authors' institutional review board approved, prospective, craniofacial registry for posterior cranial expansion between 2008 and 2011. Data collected included age, weight, diagnosis, surgical procedure and duration, perioperative laboratory data, number of perioperative blood donor exposures, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data for conventional osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis were then compared. Results: The registry query returned data from 25 subjects (16 with conventional osteotomy and nine with distraction osteogenesis). There were no significant differences in age or weight between the two groups. Mean total surgery time for conventional osteotomy was 239 ± 48 minutes versus 200 ± 70 minutes for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.11). Intensive care unit stay was a median of 3.5 days with conventional osteotomy versus 4.0 days for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in median hospital length of stay, calculated blood loss in blood volumes, total perioperative blood donor exposures, intraoperative complications, or postoperative complications. Conclusions: The results from this review of the authors' early experience with posterior vault distraction osteogenesis suggest that distraction osteogenesis and conventional osteotomy have similar perioperative safety and morbidity profiles. These data may seem counterintuitive, and the perioperative course of children undergoing distraction osteogenesis is likely to improve as experience with distraction osteogenesis increases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859329651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859329651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182443164

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182443164

M3 - Article

C2 - 22456381

AN - SCOPUS:84859329651

VL - 129

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 4

ER -