Practical Considerations in Sepsis Resuscitation

Brit Long, Alex Koyfman, Katharine L. Modisett, Christian J. Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a common condition managed in the emergency department, and the majority of patients respond to resuscitation measures, including antibiotics and i.v. fluids. However, a proportion of patients will fail to respond to standard treatment. Objective: This review elucidates practical considerations for management of sepsis in patients who fail to respond to standard treatment. Discussion: Early goal-directed therapy revolutionized sepsis management. However, there is a paucity of literature that provides a well-defined treatment algorithm for patients who fail to improve with therapy. Refractory shock can be defined as continued patient hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure, ≤ 65 mm Hg, lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, altered mental status) after adequate fluid loading (at least 30 mL/kg i.v.), the use of two vasopressors (with one as norepinephrine), and provision of antibiotics. When a lack of improvement is evident in the early stages of resuscitation, systematically considering source control, appropriate volume resuscitation, adequate antimicrobial coverage, vasopressor selection, presence of metabolic pathology, and complications of resuscitation, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and respiratory failure, allow emergency physicians to address the entire clinical scenario. Conclusions: The care of sepsis has experienced many changes in recent years. Care of the patient with sepsis who is not responding appropriately to initial resuscitation is troublesome for emergency physicians. This review provides practical considerations for resuscitation of the patient with septic shock. When a septic patient is refractory to standard therapy, systematically evaluating the patient and clinical course may lead to improved outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 31 2016

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Sepsis
Emergencies
Therapeutics
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Physicians
Septic Shock
Respiratory Insufficiency
Hospital Emergency Service
Shock
Lactic Acid
Norepinephrine
Patient Care
Arterial Pressure
Hemodynamics
Pathology

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial
  • Metabolic
  • Resuscitation
  • Sepsis
  • Septic shock
  • Vasopressor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Practical Considerations in Sepsis Resuscitation. / Long, Brit; Koyfman, Alex; Modisett, Katharine L.; Woods, Christian J.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, 31.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Long, Brit ; Koyfman, Alex ; Modisett, Katharine L. ; Woods, Christian J. / Practical Considerations in Sepsis Resuscitation. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016.
@article{c75418c26bbc4f1f91d79fb6391f7379,
title = "Practical Considerations in Sepsis Resuscitation",
abstract = "Background: Sepsis is a common condition managed in the emergency department, and the majority of patients respond to resuscitation measures, including antibiotics and i.v. fluids. However, a proportion of patients will fail to respond to standard treatment. Objective: This review elucidates practical considerations for management of sepsis in patients who fail to respond to standard treatment. Discussion: Early goal-directed therapy revolutionized sepsis management. However, there is a paucity of literature that provides a well-defined treatment algorithm for patients who fail to improve with therapy. Refractory shock can be defined as continued patient hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure, ≤ 65 mm Hg, lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, altered mental status) after adequate fluid loading (at least 30 mL/kg i.v.), the use of two vasopressors (with one as norepinephrine), and provision of antibiotics. When a lack of improvement is evident in the early stages of resuscitation, systematically considering source control, appropriate volume resuscitation, adequate antimicrobial coverage, vasopressor selection, presence of metabolic pathology, and complications of resuscitation, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and respiratory failure, allow emergency physicians to address the entire clinical scenario. Conclusions: The care of sepsis has experienced many changes in recent years. Care of the patient with sepsis who is not responding appropriately to initial resuscitation is troublesome for emergency physicians. This review provides practical considerations for resuscitation of the patient with septic shock. When a septic patient is refractory to standard therapy, systematically evaluating the patient and clinical course may lead to improved outcomes.",
keywords = "Antimicrobial, Metabolic, Resuscitation, Sepsis, Septic shock, Vasopressor",
author = "Brit Long and Alex Koyfman and Modisett, {Katharine L.} and Woods, {Christian J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical Considerations in Sepsis Resuscitation

AU - Long, Brit

AU - Koyfman, Alex

AU - Modisett, Katharine L.

AU - Woods, Christian J.

PY - 2016/5/31

Y1 - 2016/5/31

N2 - Background: Sepsis is a common condition managed in the emergency department, and the majority of patients respond to resuscitation measures, including antibiotics and i.v. fluids. However, a proportion of patients will fail to respond to standard treatment. Objective: This review elucidates practical considerations for management of sepsis in patients who fail to respond to standard treatment. Discussion: Early goal-directed therapy revolutionized sepsis management. However, there is a paucity of literature that provides a well-defined treatment algorithm for patients who fail to improve with therapy. Refractory shock can be defined as continued patient hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure, ≤ 65 mm Hg, lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, altered mental status) after adequate fluid loading (at least 30 mL/kg i.v.), the use of two vasopressors (with one as norepinephrine), and provision of antibiotics. When a lack of improvement is evident in the early stages of resuscitation, systematically considering source control, appropriate volume resuscitation, adequate antimicrobial coverage, vasopressor selection, presence of metabolic pathology, and complications of resuscitation, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and respiratory failure, allow emergency physicians to address the entire clinical scenario. Conclusions: The care of sepsis has experienced many changes in recent years. Care of the patient with sepsis who is not responding appropriately to initial resuscitation is troublesome for emergency physicians. This review provides practical considerations for resuscitation of the patient with septic shock. When a septic patient is refractory to standard therapy, systematically evaluating the patient and clinical course may lead to improved outcomes.

AB - Background: Sepsis is a common condition managed in the emergency department, and the majority of patients respond to resuscitation measures, including antibiotics and i.v. fluids. However, a proportion of patients will fail to respond to standard treatment. Objective: This review elucidates practical considerations for management of sepsis in patients who fail to respond to standard treatment. Discussion: Early goal-directed therapy revolutionized sepsis management. However, there is a paucity of literature that provides a well-defined treatment algorithm for patients who fail to improve with therapy. Refractory shock can be defined as continued patient hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure, ≤ 65 mm Hg, lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, altered mental status) after adequate fluid loading (at least 30 mL/kg i.v.), the use of two vasopressors (with one as norepinephrine), and provision of antibiotics. When a lack of improvement is evident in the early stages of resuscitation, systematically considering source control, appropriate volume resuscitation, adequate antimicrobial coverage, vasopressor selection, presence of metabolic pathology, and complications of resuscitation, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and respiratory failure, allow emergency physicians to address the entire clinical scenario. Conclusions: The care of sepsis has experienced many changes in recent years. Care of the patient with sepsis who is not responding appropriately to initial resuscitation is troublesome for emergency physicians. This review provides practical considerations for resuscitation of the patient with septic shock. When a septic patient is refractory to standard therapy, systematically evaluating the patient and clinical course may lead to improved outcomes.

KW - Antimicrobial

KW - Metabolic

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Sepsis

KW - Septic shock

KW - Vasopressor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006129671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006129671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 27823892

AN - SCOPUS:85006129671

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

ER -