Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods

Richard C. Robinson, John P. Garofalo, Pamela Behnk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

As Americans continue to grow ever sicker from chronic illnesses, such as heart disease, cancer, and stroke, the need for comprehensive interventions has also grown (Kung, Hoyert, Xu, & Murphy, 2008). An estimated 70% of deaths each year are attributable to chronic illness, with heart disease, cancer, and stroke accounting for 50% of those deaths (Kung et al., 2008). Americans spend a large majority of their time in the workplace and, as can be seen in other chapters of this Handbook, that fact has made occupational settings an ideal place for prevention and health intervention programs for many years (Haskell & Blair, 1980). However, the effectiveness of these programs has to be measured and evaluated if they are to survive. The importance of program evaluation, therefore, cannot be underestimated. The purview of program evaluation exists within the social sciences, but also within the private business sector and governmental programs. In fact, The Health Communication Unit at the University of Toronto (2007) goes as far as to define a program as follows: ".any group of related complementary activities intended to achieve specific outcomes or results. For example, community gardens, shopping skill classes and health cooking demonstrations." (p. 5). Furthermore, they define a program evaluation as, ".the systematic gathering, analysis and reporting of data about a program to assist decision making" (p. 6).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Occupational Health and Wellness
PublisherSpringer US
Pages495-511
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781461448396
ISBN (Print)9781461448389
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Program Evaluation
Heart Neoplasms
Heart Diseases
Chronic Disease
Stroke
Health Communication
Private Sector
Social Sciences
Health
Cooking
Workplace
Decision Making
Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Robinson, R. C., Garofalo, J. P., & Behnk, P. (2012). Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods. In Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness (pp. 495-511). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_23

Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods. / Robinson, Richard C.; Garofalo, John P.; Behnk, Pamela.

Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness. Springer US, 2012. p. 495-511.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Robinson, RC, Garofalo, JP & Behnk, P 2012, Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods. in Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness. Springer US, pp. 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_23
Robinson RC, Garofalo JP, Behnk P. Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods. In Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness. Springer US. 2012. p. 495-511 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_23
Robinson, Richard C. ; Garofalo, John P. ; Behnk, Pamela. / Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods. Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness. Springer US, 2012. pp. 495-511
@inbook{942a66469a7c472385f9b18037d25c7d,
title = "Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods",
abstract = "As Americans continue to grow ever sicker from chronic illnesses, such as heart disease, cancer, and stroke, the need for comprehensive interventions has also grown (Kung, Hoyert, Xu, & Murphy, 2008). An estimated 70{\%} of deaths each year are attributable to chronic illness, with heart disease, cancer, and stroke accounting for 50{\%} of those deaths (Kung et al., 2008). Americans spend a large majority of their time in the workplace and, as can be seen in other chapters of this Handbook, that fact has made occupational settings an ideal place for prevention and health intervention programs for many years (Haskell & Blair, 1980). However, the effectiveness of these programs has to be measured and evaluated if they are to survive. The importance of program evaluation, therefore, cannot be underestimated. The purview of program evaluation exists within the social sciences, but also within the private business sector and governmental programs. In fact, The Health Communication Unit at the University of Toronto (2007) goes as far as to define a program as follows: {"}.any group of related complementary activities intended to achieve specific outcomes or results. For example, community gardens, shopping skill classes and health cooking demonstrations.{"} (p. 5). Furthermore, they define a program evaluation as, {"}.the systematic gathering, analysis and reporting of data about a program to assist decision making{"} (p. 6).",
author = "Robinson, {Richard C.} and Garofalo, {John P.} and Pamela Behnk",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_23",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781461448389",
pages = "495--511",
booktitle = "Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness",
publisher = "Springer US",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Program evaluation of prevention and intervention methods

AU - Robinson, Richard C.

AU - Garofalo, John P.

AU - Behnk, Pamela

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - As Americans continue to grow ever sicker from chronic illnesses, such as heart disease, cancer, and stroke, the need for comprehensive interventions has also grown (Kung, Hoyert, Xu, & Murphy, 2008). An estimated 70% of deaths each year are attributable to chronic illness, with heart disease, cancer, and stroke accounting for 50% of those deaths (Kung et al., 2008). Americans spend a large majority of their time in the workplace and, as can be seen in other chapters of this Handbook, that fact has made occupational settings an ideal place for prevention and health intervention programs for many years (Haskell & Blair, 1980). However, the effectiveness of these programs has to be measured and evaluated if they are to survive. The importance of program evaluation, therefore, cannot be underestimated. The purview of program evaluation exists within the social sciences, but also within the private business sector and governmental programs. In fact, The Health Communication Unit at the University of Toronto (2007) goes as far as to define a program as follows: ".any group of related complementary activities intended to achieve specific outcomes or results. For example, community gardens, shopping skill classes and health cooking demonstrations." (p. 5). Furthermore, they define a program evaluation as, ".the systematic gathering, analysis and reporting of data about a program to assist decision making" (p. 6).

AB - As Americans continue to grow ever sicker from chronic illnesses, such as heart disease, cancer, and stroke, the need for comprehensive interventions has also grown (Kung, Hoyert, Xu, & Murphy, 2008). An estimated 70% of deaths each year are attributable to chronic illness, with heart disease, cancer, and stroke accounting for 50% of those deaths (Kung et al., 2008). Americans spend a large majority of their time in the workplace and, as can be seen in other chapters of this Handbook, that fact has made occupational settings an ideal place for prevention and health intervention programs for many years (Haskell & Blair, 1980). However, the effectiveness of these programs has to be measured and evaluated if they are to survive. The importance of program evaluation, therefore, cannot be underestimated. The purview of program evaluation exists within the social sciences, but also within the private business sector and governmental programs. In fact, The Health Communication Unit at the University of Toronto (2007) goes as far as to define a program as follows: ".any group of related complementary activities intended to achieve specific outcomes or results. For example, community gardens, shopping skill classes and health cooking demonstrations." (p. 5). Furthermore, they define a program evaluation as, ".the systematic gathering, analysis and reporting of data about a program to assist decision making" (p. 6).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939969716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939969716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_23

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_23

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84939969716

SN - 9781461448389

SP - 495

EP - 511

BT - Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness

PB - Springer US

ER -