Prompt management of anastomotic leak or acute obstruction after minimally invasive pyeloplasty with percutaneous nephrostomy preserves outcomes

Asim Ozayar, Monica S C Morgan, Justin I. Friedlander, Meghan Saumur, Govind Krishan, Jeffrey Gahan, Jeffrey A Cadeddu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Urine leak or obstruction in the early postoperative period is a worrisome complication of pyeloplasty. Suboptimal management may risk long-term success. We evaluated percutaneous nephrostomy to manage complications of minimally invasive pyeloplasty.

Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of 125 patients who underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty performed by a single surgeon from May 2004 to May 2013. All complications were catalogued and patients with anastomotic urine leakage or postoperative obstruction were identified. Less than 7 days postoperatively percutaneous nephrostomy was done in each case. Surgical success was defined as resolution of flank pain and/or improved half-time (less than 20 minutes) on diuretic renogram.

Results Early percutaneous nephrostomy placement was required in 12 patients (9.6%) for symptomatic obstruction (6) or anastomotic urine leakage (6) a median of 4.5 days (range 2 to 7) postoperatively. Percutaneous nephrostomies remained in place a median of 9.5 days (range 5 to 42). Median followup was 15 months (range 2 to 80). Mean half-time was 36.4 minutes preoperatively and 11.1 minutes postoperatively. Continued postoperative obstruction (half-time greater than 20 minutes) was documented in 1 (8%) and 13 patients (11.5%) who did and did not require percutaneous nephrostomy placement, respectively. There was no statistical difference in radiological and clinical success rates between the percutaneous nephrostomy group and the 113 patients in whom minimally invasive pyeloplasty was uncomplicated (p = 0.74 and 0.28, respectively).

Conclusions In patients treated with minimally invasive pyeloplasty aggressive management of acute urinary complications with percutaneous nephrostomy placement preserved radiographic and symptomatic outcomes that were comparable to those in patients without complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1716-1719
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume192
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Anastomotic Leak
Urine
Flank Pain
Risk Management
Diuretics
Postoperative Period

Keywords

  • kidney
  • minimally invasive
  • nephrostomy
  • percutaneous
  • postoperative complications
  • surgical procedures
  • ureteral obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Prompt management of anastomotic leak or acute obstruction after minimally invasive pyeloplasty with percutaneous nephrostomy preserves outcomes. / Ozayar, Asim; Morgan, Monica S C; Friedlander, Justin I.; Saumur, Meghan; Krishan, Govind; Gahan, Jeffrey; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 192, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 1716-1719.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozayar, Asim ; Morgan, Monica S C ; Friedlander, Justin I. ; Saumur, Meghan ; Krishan, Govind ; Gahan, Jeffrey ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. / Prompt management of anastomotic leak or acute obstruction after minimally invasive pyeloplasty with percutaneous nephrostomy preserves outcomes. In: Journal of Urology. 2014 ; Vol. 192, No. 6. pp. 1716-1719.
@article{721bfb04bbfa4d6fada671ab5be4a37f,
title = "Prompt management of anastomotic leak or acute obstruction after minimally invasive pyeloplasty with percutaneous nephrostomy preserves outcomes",
abstract = "Purpose Urine leak or obstruction in the early postoperative period is a worrisome complication of pyeloplasty. Suboptimal management may risk long-term success. We evaluated percutaneous nephrostomy to manage complications of minimally invasive pyeloplasty.Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of 125 patients who underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty performed by a single surgeon from May 2004 to May 2013. All complications were catalogued and patients with anastomotic urine leakage or postoperative obstruction were identified. Less than 7 days postoperatively percutaneous nephrostomy was done in each case. Surgical success was defined as resolution of flank pain and/or improved half-time (less than 20 minutes) on diuretic renogram.Results Early percutaneous nephrostomy placement was required in 12 patients (9.6{\%}) for symptomatic obstruction (6) or anastomotic urine leakage (6) a median of 4.5 days (range 2 to 7) postoperatively. Percutaneous nephrostomies remained in place a median of 9.5 days (range 5 to 42). Median followup was 15 months (range 2 to 80). Mean half-time was 36.4 minutes preoperatively and 11.1 minutes postoperatively. Continued postoperative obstruction (half-time greater than 20 minutes) was documented in 1 (8{\%}) and 13 patients (11.5{\%}) who did and did not require percutaneous nephrostomy placement, respectively. There was no statistical difference in radiological and clinical success rates between the percutaneous nephrostomy group and the 113 patients in whom minimally invasive pyeloplasty was uncomplicated (p = 0.74 and 0.28, respectively).Conclusions In patients treated with minimally invasive pyeloplasty aggressive management of acute urinary complications with percutaneous nephrostomy placement preserved radiographic and symptomatic outcomes that were comparable to those in patients without complications.",
keywords = "kidney, minimally invasive, nephrostomy, percutaneous, postoperative complications, surgical procedures, ureteral obstruction",
author = "Asim Ozayar and Morgan, {Monica S C} and Friedlander, {Justin I.} and Meghan Saumur and Govind Krishan and Jeffrey Gahan and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "192",
pages = "1716--1719",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prompt management of anastomotic leak or acute obstruction after minimally invasive pyeloplasty with percutaneous nephrostomy preserves outcomes

AU - Ozayar, Asim

AU - Morgan, Monica S C

AU - Friedlander, Justin I.

AU - Saumur, Meghan

AU - Krishan, Govind

AU - Gahan, Jeffrey

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Purpose Urine leak or obstruction in the early postoperative period is a worrisome complication of pyeloplasty. Suboptimal management may risk long-term success. We evaluated percutaneous nephrostomy to manage complications of minimally invasive pyeloplasty.Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of 125 patients who underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty performed by a single surgeon from May 2004 to May 2013. All complications were catalogued and patients with anastomotic urine leakage or postoperative obstruction were identified. Less than 7 days postoperatively percutaneous nephrostomy was done in each case. Surgical success was defined as resolution of flank pain and/or improved half-time (less than 20 minutes) on diuretic renogram.Results Early percutaneous nephrostomy placement was required in 12 patients (9.6%) for symptomatic obstruction (6) or anastomotic urine leakage (6) a median of 4.5 days (range 2 to 7) postoperatively. Percutaneous nephrostomies remained in place a median of 9.5 days (range 5 to 42). Median followup was 15 months (range 2 to 80). Mean half-time was 36.4 minutes preoperatively and 11.1 minutes postoperatively. Continued postoperative obstruction (half-time greater than 20 minutes) was documented in 1 (8%) and 13 patients (11.5%) who did and did not require percutaneous nephrostomy placement, respectively. There was no statistical difference in radiological and clinical success rates between the percutaneous nephrostomy group and the 113 patients in whom minimally invasive pyeloplasty was uncomplicated (p = 0.74 and 0.28, respectively).Conclusions In patients treated with minimally invasive pyeloplasty aggressive management of acute urinary complications with percutaneous nephrostomy placement preserved radiographic and symptomatic outcomes that were comparable to those in patients without complications.

AB - Purpose Urine leak or obstruction in the early postoperative period is a worrisome complication of pyeloplasty. Suboptimal management may risk long-term success. We evaluated percutaneous nephrostomy to manage complications of minimally invasive pyeloplasty.Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of 125 patients who underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty performed by a single surgeon from May 2004 to May 2013. All complications were catalogued and patients with anastomotic urine leakage or postoperative obstruction were identified. Less than 7 days postoperatively percutaneous nephrostomy was done in each case. Surgical success was defined as resolution of flank pain and/or improved half-time (less than 20 minutes) on diuretic renogram.Results Early percutaneous nephrostomy placement was required in 12 patients (9.6%) for symptomatic obstruction (6) or anastomotic urine leakage (6) a median of 4.5 days (range 2 to 7) postoperatively. Percutaneous nephrostomies remained in place a median of 9.5 days (range 5 to 42). Median followup was 15 months (range 2 to 80). Mean half-time was 36.4 minutes preoperatively and 11.1 minutes postoperatively. Continued postoperative obstruction (half-time greater than 20 minutes) was documented in 1 (8%) and 13 patients (11.5%) who did and did not require percutaneous nephrostomy placement, respectively. There was no statistical difference in radiological and clinical success rates between the percutaneous nephrostomy group and the 113 patients in whom minimally invasive pyeloplasty was uncomplicated (p = 0.74 and 0.28, respectively).Conclusions In patients treated with minimally invasive pyeloplasty aggressive management of acute urinary complications with percutaneous nephrostomy placement preserved radiographic and symptomatic outcomes that were comparable to those in patients without complications.

KW - kidney

KW - minimally invasive

KW - nephrostomy

KW - percutaneous

KW - postoperative complications

KW - surgical procedures

KW - ureteral obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914110444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914110444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.041

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.041

M3 - Article

C2 - 24952241

AN - SCOPUS:84914110444

VL - 192

SP - 1716

EP - 1719

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -