Radiology knowledge in new medical graduates in New Zealand

Rathan M. Subramaniam, Tim Hall, Tina Chou, Dale Sheehan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To establish the level of knowledge of new medical graduates in New Zealand about common radiological investigations and to assess their ability to request most appropriate, cost-effective radiological investigations for common clinical scenarios. Methods: A test was developed and administered in Waikato, Christchurch, Rotorua, Auckland, and Dunedin hospitals during the first month of new house officer year (November 2002). Results: Sixty-two first year house officers participated; 59 were New Zealand medical graduates (Auckland: 24 and Otago: 35) and 3 were from overseas institutions. The mean score for questions that assessed about risks involved in common investigations, including radiation, was 47% (95% CI: 45%-49%). The mean score for selecting the appropriate clinical investigations was 53% (95% CI 52%-54%). Most significantly, only 42% (95% CI 38%-46%) of the respondents thought they had adequate radiology teaching to work as house officers. The following percentage of the respondents never observed the respective examination during their medical school training: barium enema 72% (95% CI: 60%-82%); IVU 75% (95% CI: 63%-87%); US scan 25% (95% CI: 16%-37%); CT scan 20% (95% CI: 11%-32%); angiogram 16% (95% CI: 9%-28%); MRI 42%(95% CI: 30%-54%). The mean score for the practical knowledge about common investigations was 50 (95% CI: 48%-52%). Conclusions: Medical students report that they have limited exposure to radiology teaching during their medical school training. The test results suggest that medical school training enabled them to commence their probationary year with a 'just safe' level of radiology knowledge and skill.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNew Zealand Medical Journal
Volume118
Issue number1224
StatePublished - Oct 28 2005

Fingerprint

Medical Schools
New Zealand
Radiology
Teaching
Medical Students
Angiography
Radiation
Costs and Cost Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Radiology knowledge in new medical graduates in New Zealand. / Subramaniam, Rathan M.; Hall, Tim; Chou, Tina; Sheehan, Dale.

In: New Zealand Medical Journal, Vol. 118, No. 1224, 28.10.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Subramaniam, Rathan M. ; Hall, Tim ; Chou, Tina ; Sheehan, Dale. / Radiology knowledge in new medical graduates in New Zealand. In: New Zealand Medical Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 118, No. 1224.
@article{92cf9b5ad61b4f98ab458ca3485a9420,
title = "Radiology knowledge in new medical graduates in New Zealand",
abstract = "Aims: To establish the level of knowledge of new medical graduates in New Zealand about common radiological investigations and to assess their ability to request most appropriate, cost-effective radiological investigations for common clinical scenarios. Methods: A test was developed and administered in Waikato, Christchurch, Rotorua, Auckland, and Dunedin hospitals during the first month of new house officer year (November 2002). Results: Sixty-two first year house officers participated; 59 were New Zealand medical graduates (Auckland: 24 and Otago: 35) and 3 were from overseas institutions. The mean score for questions that assessed about risks involved in common investigations, including radiation, was 47{\%} (95{\%} CI: 45{\%}-49{\%}). The mean score for selecting the appropriate clinical investigations was 53{\%} (95{\%} CI 52{\%}-54{\%}). Most significantly, only 42{\%} (95{\%} CI 38{\%}-46{\%}) of the respondents thought they had adequate radiology teaching to work as house officers. The following percentage of the respondents never observed the respective examination during their medical school training: barium enema 72{\%} (95{\%} CI: 60{\%}-82{\%}); IVU 75{\%} (95{\%} CI: 63{\%}-87{\%}); US scan 25{\%} (95{\%} CI: 16{\%}-37{\%}); CT scan 20{\%} (95{\%} CI: 11{\%}-32{\%}); angiogram 16{\%} (95{\%} CI: 9{\%}-28{\%}); MRI 42{\%}(95{\%} CI: 30{\%}-54{\%}). The mean score for the practical knowledge about common investigations was 50 (95{\%} CI: 48{\%}-52{\%}). Conclusions: Medical students report that they have limited exposure to radiology teaching during their medical school training. The test results suggest that medical school training enabled them to commence their probationary year with a 'just safe' level of radiology knowledge and skill.",
author = "Subramaniam, {Rathan M.} and Tim Hall and Tina Chou and Dale Sheehan",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "28",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
journal = "New Zealand Medical Journal",
issn = "0028-8446",
publisher = "New Zealand Medical Association",
number = "1224",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiology knowledge in new medical graduates in New Zealand

AU - Subramaniam, Rathan M.

AU - Hall, Tim

AU - Chou, Tina

AU - Sheehan, Dale

PY - 2005/10/28

Y1 - 2005/10/28

N2 - Aims: To establish the level of knowledge of new medical graduates in New Zealand about common radiological investigations and to assess their ability to request most appropriate, cost-effective radiological investigations for common clinical scenarios. Methods: A test was developed and administered in Waikato, Christchurch, Rotorua, Auckland, and Dunedin hospitals during the first month of new house officer year (November 2002). Results: Sixty-two first year house officers participated; 59 were New Zealand medical graduates (Auckland: 24 and Otago: 35) and 3 were from overseas institutions. The mean score for questions that assessed about risks involved in common investigations, including radiation, was 47% (95% CI: 45%-49%). The mean score for selecting the appropriate clinical investigations was 53% (95% CI 52%-54%). Most significantly, only 42% (95% CI 38%-46%) of the respondents thought they had adequate radiology teaching to work as house officers. The following percentage of the respondents never observed the respective examination during their medical school training: barium enema 72% (95% CI: 60%-82%); IVU 75% (95% CI: 63%-87%); US scan 25% (95% CI: 16%-37%); CT scan 20% (95% CI: 11%-32%); angiogram 16% (95% CI: 9%-28%); MRI 42%(95% CI: 30%-54%). The mean score for the practical knowledge about common investigations was 50 (95% CI: 48%-52%). Conclusions: Medical students report that they have limited exposure to radiology teaching during their medical school training. The test results suggest that medical school training enabled them to commence their probationary year with a 'just safe' level of radiology knowledge and skill.

AB - Aims: To establish the level of knowledge of new medical graduates in New Zealand about common radiological investigations and to assess their ability to request most appropriate, cost-effective radiological investigations for common clinical scenarios. Methods: A test was developed and administered in Waikato, Christchurch, Rotorua, Auckland, and Dunedin hospitals during the first month of new house officer year (November 2002). Results: Sixty-two first year house officers participated; 59 were New Zealand medical graduates (Auckland: 24 and Otago: 35) and 3 were from overseas institutions. The mean score for questions that assessed about risks involved in common investigations, including radiation, was 47% (95% CI: 45%-49%). The mean score for selecting the appropriate clinical investigations was 53% (95% CI 52%-54%). Most significantly, only 42% (95% CI 38%-46%) of the respondents thought they had adequate radiology teaching to work as house officers. The following percentage of the respondents never observed the respective examination during their medical school training: barium enema 72% (95% CI: 60%-82%); IVU 75% (95% CI: 63%-87%); US scan 25% (95% CI: 16%-37%); CT scan 20% (95% CI: 11%-32%); angiogram 16% (95% CI: 9%-28%); MRI 42%(95% CI: 30%-54%). The mean score for the practical knowledge about common investigations was 50 (95% CI: 48%-52%). Conclusions: Medical students report that they have limited exposure to radiology teaching during their medical school training. The test results suggest that medical school training enabled them to commence their probationary year with a 'just safe' level of radiology knowledge and skill.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744468344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744468344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16258575

AN - SCOPUS:27744468344

VL - 118

JO - New Zealand Medical Journal

JF - New Zealand Medical Journal

SN - 0028-8446

IS - 1224

ER -