Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning

Richard J. Fehring, Mary Schneider, Kathleen Raviele, Dana Rodriguez, Jessica Pruszynski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. Study design: Six hundred and sixty-seven women and their male partners were randomized into either an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) group or a cervical mucus monitoring (CMM) group. Both groups utilized a Web site with instructions, charts and support. Acceptability was assessed online at 1, 3 and 6 months. Pregnancy rates were determined by survival analysis. Results: The EHFM participants (N= 197) had a total pregnancy rate of 7 per 100 users over 12 months of use compared with 18.5 for the CMM group (N= 164). The log rank survival test showed a significant difference (p<.01) in survival functions. Mean acceptability for both groups increased significantly over time (p<.0001). Continuation rates at 12 months were 40.6% for the monitor group and 36.6% for the mucus group. Conclusion: In comparison with the CMM, the EHFM method of family planning was more effective. All users had an increase in acceptability over time. Results are tempered by the high dropout rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalContraception
Volume88
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Family Planning Services
Cervix Mucus
Internet
Fertility
Pregnancy Rate
Survival
Mucus
Survival Analysis

Keywords

  • Family planning
  • Fertility monitoring
  • Fertility-awareness-based methods
  • Natural family planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. / Fehring, Richard J.; Schneider, Mary; Raviele, Kathleen; Rodriguez, Dana; Pruszynski, Jessica.

In: Contraception, Vol. 88, No. 1, 01.07.2013, p. 24-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fehring, Richard J. ; Schneider, Mary ; Raviele, Kathleen ; Rodriguez, Dana ; Pruszynski, Jessica. / Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. In: Contraception. 2013 ; Vol. 88, No. 1. pp. 24-30.
@article{afca391c4a5944618e08cf94a846400f,
title = "Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning",
abstract = "Background: The aim was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. Study design: Six hundred and sixty-seven women and their male partners were randomized into either an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) group or a cervical mucus monitoring (CMM) group. Both groups utilized a Web site with instructions, charts and support. Acceptability was assessed online at 1, 3 and 6 months. Pregnancy rates were determined by survival analysis. Results: The EHFM participants (N= 197) had a total pregnancy rate of 7 per 100 users over 12 months of use compared with 18.5 for the CMM group (N= 164). The log rank survival test showed a significant difference (p<.01) in survival functions. Mean acceptability for both groups increased significantly over time (p<.0001). Continuation rates at 12 months were 40.6{\%} for the monitor group and 36.6{\%} for the mucus group. Conclusion: In comparison with the CMM, the EHFM method of family planning was more effective. All users had an increase in acceptability over time. Results are tempered by the high dropout rate.",
keywords = "Family planning, Fertility monitoring, Fertility-awareness-based methods, Natural family planning",
author = "Fehring, {Richard J.} and Mary Schneider and Kathleen Raviele and Dana Rodriguez and Jessica Pruszynski",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "24--30",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning

AU - Fehring, Richard J.

AU - Schneider, Mary

AU - Raviele, Kathleen

AU - Rodriguez, Dana

AU - Pruszynski, Jessica

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Background: The aim was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. Study design: Six hundred and sixty-seven women and their male partners were randomized into either an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) group or a cervical mucus monitoring (CMM) group. Both groups utilized a Web site with instructions, charts and support. Acceptability was assessed online at 1, 3 and 6 months. Pregnancy rates were determined by survival analysis. Results: The EHFM participants (N= 197) had a total pregnancy rate of 7 per 100 users over 12 months of use compared with 18.5 for the CMM group (N= 164). The log rank survival test showed a significant difference (p<.01) in survival functions. Mean acceptability for both groups increased significantly over time (p<.0001). Continuation rates at 12 months were 40.6% for the monitor group and 36.6% for the mucus group. Conclusion: In comparison with the CMM, the EHFM method of family planning was more effective. All users had an increase in acceptability over time. Results are tempered by the high dropout rate.

AB - Background: The aim was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. Study design: Six hundred and sixty-seven women and their male partners were randomized into either an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) group or a cervical mucus monitoring (CMM) group. Both groups utilized a Web site with instructions, charts and support. Acceptability was assessed online at 1, 3 and 6 months. Pregnancy rates were determined by survival analysis. Results: The EHFM participants (N= 197) had a total pregnancy rate of 7 per 100 users over 12 months of use compared with 18.5 for the CMM group (N= 164). The log rank survival test showed a significant difference (p<.01) in survival functions. Mean acceptability for both groups increased significantly over time (p<.0001). Continuation rates at 12 months were 40.6% for the monitor group and 36.6% for the mucus group. Conclusion: In comparison with the CMM, the EHFM method of family planning was more effective. All users had an increase in acceptability over time. Results are tempered by the high dropout rate.

KW - Family planning

KW - Fertility monitoring

KW - Fertility-awareness-based methods

KW - Natural family planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879124115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879124115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 23153900

AN - SCOPUS:84879124115

VL - 88

SP - 24

EP - 30

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 1

ER -