Re: Conservative management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): Is it appropriate and if so what duration of follow-up is needed?

Jeffrey A Cadeddu

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.091

Re: Conservative management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): Is it appropriate and if so what duration of follow-up is needed?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	974
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Urology
Volume	189
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.091
State	Published - Mar 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Urology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.091

Cite this

@article{378f3d2932844f7583766ac7f423754d,

title = "Re: Conservative management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): Is it appropriate and if so what duration of follow-up is needed?",

author = "Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A}",

year = "2013",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.091",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "189",

pages = "974",

journal = "Journal of Urology",

issn = "0022-5347",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re

T2 - Conservative management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): Is it appropriate and if so what duration of follow-up is needed?

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873605939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873605939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.091

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.091

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 23394653

AN - SCOPUS:84873605939

SN - 0022-5347

VL - 189

SP - 974

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

IS - 3

ER -

Re: Conservative management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): Is it appropriate and if so what duration of follow-up is needed?

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this