Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: Findings of focus group participants

Ellen Iverson, Aaron Celious, Carie R. Kennedy, Erica Shehane, Alexander Eastman, Victoria Warren, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Brian Clarridge, Bradley D. Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We undertook the current investigation to explore how the pressures of serving as a surrogate decision-maker (SDM) for an acutely ill family member influence attitudes regarding clinical investigation. Methods: We conducted a prospective study involving SDMs for critically ill patients cared for in the ICUs of two urban hospitals. Measurements included participation in focus groups designed to explore perceptions of ICU care and clinical research. Audiotapes were transcribed and analyzed to identify common patterns and themes using grounded theory. Demographic and clinical data were summarized using standard statistical methods. Results: Seventy-four SDMs (corresponding to 24% of eligible patients) participated. Most SDMs were women and described long-term relationships with the patients represented. SDMs described their role as "overwhelming," their emotions were accentuated by the fatigue of the ICU experience, and they relied on family members, social contacts, and religion as sources of support. Altruism was reported as a common motivation for potential study participation, a sentiment often strengthened by the critical illness episode. Although research was viewed as optional, some SDMs perceived invitation for research participation as tacit acknowledgment of therapeutic failure. SDMs expressed a preference for observational studies (perceived as low risk) over interventional designs (perceived as higher risk). Trust in the ICU team and the research enterprise seemed tightly linked. Conclusions: Despite significant emotional duress, SDMs expressed interest in investigation and described multiple factors motivating participation. Consent processes that minimize the effects of anxiety may be one strategy to enhance recruitment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1433-1439
Number of pages7
JournalChest
Volume142
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Critical Illness
Research
Tape Recording
Altruism
Urban Hospitals
Religion
SDM
Observational Studies
Fatigue
Motivation
Emotions
Anxiety
Demography
Prospective Studies
Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Iverson, E., Celious, A., Kennedy, C. R., Shehane, E., Eastman, A., Warren, V., ... Freeman, B. D. (2012). Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: Findings of focus group participants. Chest, 142(6), 1433-1439. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-3199

Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research : Findings of focus group participants. / Iverson, Ellen; Celious, Aaron; Kennedy, Carie R.; Shehane, Erica; Eastman, Alexander; Warren, Victoria; Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana; Clarridge, Brian; Freeman, Bradley D.

In: Chest, Vol. 142, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 1433-1439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iverson, E, Celious, A, Kennedy, CR, Shehane, E, Eastman, A, Warren, V, Bolcic-Jankovic, D, Clarridge, B & Freeman, BD 2012, 'Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: Findings of focus group participants', Chest, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 1433-1439. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-3199
Iverson, Ellen ; Celious, Aaron ; Kennedy, Carie R. ; Shehane, Erica ; Eastman, Alexander ; Warren, Victoria ; Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana ; Clarridge, Brian ; Freeman, Bradley D. / Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research : Findings of focus group participants. In: Chest. 2012 ; Vol. 142, No. 6. pp. 1433-1439.
@article{f9160724cce442818785ad0f62276d60,
title = "Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: Findings of focus group participants",
abstract = "Objective: We undertook the current investigation to explore how the pressures of serving as a surrogate decision-maker (SDM) for an acutely ill family member influence attitudes regarding clinical investigation. Methods: We conducted a prospective study involving SDMs for critically ill patients cared for in the ICUs of two urban hospitals. Measurements included participation in focus groups designed to explore perceptions of ICU care and clinical research. Audiotapes were transcribed and analyzed to identify common patterns and themes using grounded theory. Demographic and clinical data were summarized using standard statistical methods. Results: Seventy-four SDMs (corresponding to 24{\%} of eligible patients) participated. Most SDMs were women and described long-term relationships with the patients represented. SDMs described their role as {"}overwhelming,{"} their emotions were accentuated by the fatigue of the ICU experience, and they relied on family members, social contacts, and religion as sources of support. Altruism was reported as a common motivation for potential study participation, a sentiment often strengthened by the critical illness episode. Although research was viewed as optional, some SDMs perceived invitation for research participation as tacit acknowledgment of therapeutic failure. SDMs expressed a preference for observational studies (perceived as low risk) over interventional designs (perceived as higher risk). Trust in the ICU team and the research enterprise seemed tightly linked. Conclusions: Despite significant emotional duress, SDMs expressed interest in investigation and described multiple factors motivating participation. Consent processes that minimize the effects of anxiety may be one strategy to enhance recruitment.",
author = "Ellen Iverson and Aaron Celious and Kennedy, {Carie R.} and Erica Shehane and Alexander Eastman and Victoria Warren and Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic and Brian Clarridge and Freeman, {Bradley D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1378/chest.11-3199",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "1433--1439",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research

T2 - Findings of focus group participants

AU - Iverson, Ellen

AU - Celious, Aaron

AU - Kennedy, Carie R.

AU - Shehane, Erica

AU - Eastman, Alexander

AU - Warren, Victoria

AU - Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana

AU - Clarridge, Brian

AU - Freeman, Bradley D.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Objective: We undertook the current investigation to explore how the pressures of serving as a surrogate decision-maker (SDM) for an acutely ill family member influence attitudes regarding clinical investigation. Methods: We conducted a prospective study involving SDMs for critically ill patients cared for in the ICUs of two urban hospitals. Measurements included participation in focus groups designed to explore perceptions of ICU care and clinical research. Audiotapes were transcribed and analyzed to identify common patterns and themes using grounded theory. Demographic and clinical data were summarized using standard statistical methods. Results: Seventy-four SDMs (corresponding to 24% of eligible patients) participated. Most SDMs were women and described long-term relationships with the patients represented. SDMs described their role as "overwhelming," their emotions were accentuated by the fatigue of the ICU experience, and they relied on family members, social contacts, and religion as sources of support. Altruism was reported as a common motivation for potential study participation, a sentiment often strengthened by the critical illness episode. Although research was viewed as optional, some SDMs perceived invitation for research participation as tacit acknowledgment of therapeutic failure. SDMs expressed a preference for observational studies (perceived as low risk) over interventional designs (perceived as higher risk). Trust in the ICU team and the research enterprise seemed tightly linked. Conclusions: Despite significant emotional duress, SDMs expressed interest in investigation and described multiple factors motivating participation. Consent processes that minimize the effects of anxiety may be one strategy to enhance recruitment.

AB - Objective: We undertook the current investigation to explore how the pressures of serving as a surrogate decision-maker (SDM) for an acutely ill family member influence attitudes regarding clinical investigation. Methods: We conducted a prospective study involving SDMs for critically ill patients cared for in the ICUs of two urban hospitals. Measurements included participation in focus groups designed to explore perceptions of ICU care and clinical research. Audiotapes were transcribed and analyzed to identify common patterns and themes using grounded theory. Demographic and clinical data were summarized using standard statistical methods. Results: Seventy-four SDMs (corresponding to 24% of eligible patients) participated. Most SDMs were women and described long-term relationships with the patients represented. SDMs described their role as "overwhelming," their emotions were accentuated by the fatigue of the ICU experience, and they relied on family members, social contacts, and religion as sources of support. Altruism was reported as a common motivation for potential study participation, a sentiment often strengthened by the critical illness episode. Although research was viewed as optional, some SDMs perceived invitation for research participation as tacit acknowledgment of therapeutic failure. SDMs expressed a preference for observational studies (perceived as low risk) over interventional designs (perceived as higher risk). Trust in the ICU team and the research enterprise seemed tightly linked. Conclusions: Despite significant emotional duress, SDMs expressed interest in investigation and described multiple factors motivating participation. Consent processes that minimize the effects of anxiety may be one strategy to enhance recruitment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870598743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870598743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.11-3199

DO - 10.1378/chest.11-3199

M3 - Article

C2 - 22677349

AN - SCOPUS:84870598743

VL - 142

SP - 1433

EP - 1439

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -