Recommendations for urodynamic assessment in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence

Elizabeth B. Takacs, Philippe E. Zimmern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is a common problem that is experienced by women of all ages. The overall evaluation and treatment of incontinence has increased in sophistication, both as a result of the introduction of urodynamic testing in the assessment of patients, and because there are increasing numbers of medical and surgical treatments available for incontinence. What was previously considered a personal problem for women, and which was rarely discussed, has become a more open and acceptable complaint for female patients to bring to their physicians. This Review aims to clarify when urodynamic testing is clearly indicated for patients with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, and describes the current recommendations from three national and international governing bodies. This Review will also highlight some of the ongoing debates over the performance, interpretation, and utility of urodynamic testing, and provide references for further reading on these topics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)544-550
Number of pages7
JournalNature Clinical Practice Urology
Volume3
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Urodynamics
Urinary Incontinence
Reading
Physicians
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Nephrology

Cite this

Recommendations for urodynamic assessment in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence. / Takacs, Elizabeth B.; Zimmern, Philippe E.

In: Nature Clinical Practice Urology, Vol. 3, No. 10, 10.2006, p. 544-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b9bb860ee9b49c1b7329090e04e5835,
title = "Recommendations for urodynamic assessment in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence",
abstract = "Urinary incontinence is a common problem that is experienced by women of all ages. The overall evaluation and treatment of incontinence has increased in sophistication, both as a result of the introduction of urodynamic testing in the assessment of patients, and because there are increasing numbers of medical and surgical treatments available for incontinence. What was previously considered a personal problem for women, and which was rarely discussed, has become a more open and acceptable complaint for female patients to bring to their physicians. This Review aims to clarify when urodynamic testing is clearly indicated for patients with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, and describes the current recommendations from three national and international governing bodies. This Review will also highlight some of the ongoing debates over the performance, interpretation, and utility of urodynamic testing, and provide references for further reading on these topics.",
author = "Takacs, {Elizabeth B.} and Zimmern, {Philippe E.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1038/ncpuro0605",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "544--550",
journal = "Nature reviews. Urology",
issn = "1759-4812",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for urodynamic assessment in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence

AU - Takacs, Elizabeth B.

AU - Zimmern, Philippe E.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Urinary incontinence is a common problem that is experienced by women of all ages. The overall evaluation and treatment of incontinence has increased in sophistication, both as a result of the introduction of urodynamic testing in the assessment of patients, and because there are increasing numbers of medical and surgical treatments available for incontinence. What was previously considered a personal problem for women, and which was rarely discussed, has become a more open and acceptable complaint for female patients to bring to their physicians. This Review aims to clarify when urodynamic testing is clearly indicated for patients with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, and describes the current recommendations from three national and international governing bodies. This Review will also highlight some of the ongoing debates over the performance, interpretation, and utility of urodynamic testing, and provide references for further reading on these topics.

AB - Urinary incontinence is a common problem that is experienced by women of all ages. The overall evaluation and treatment of incontinence has increased in sophistication, both as a result of the introduction of urodynamic testing in the assessment of patients, and because there are increasing numbers of medical and surgical treatments available for incontinence. What was previously considered a personal problem for women, and which was rarely discussed, has become a more open and acceptable complaint for female patients to bring to their physicians. This Review aims to clarify when urodynamic testing is clearly indicated for patients with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, and describes the current recommendations from three national and international governing bodies. This Review will also highlight some of the ongoing debates over the performance, interpretation, and utility of urodynamic testing, and provide references for further reading on these topics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749554398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749554398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ncpuro0605

DO - 10.1038/ncpuro0605

M3 - Article

C2 - 17031379

AN - SCOPUS:33749554398

VL - 3

SP - 544

EP - 550

JO - Nature reviews. Urology

JF - Nature reviews. Urology

SN - 1759-4812

IS - 10

ER -