Redo Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (F-BEVAR) for Failed F-BEVAR

Anna L. Driessen; Carla K. Scott; Gerardo G. Guardiola; Mirza S. Baig; Melissa L. Kirkwood; Carlos H. Timaran

doi:10.1177/15266028221098707

Redo Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (F-BEVAR) for Failed F-BEVAR

Anna L. Driessen, Carla K. Scott, Gerardo G. Guardiola, Mirza S. Baig, Melissa L. Kirkwood, Carlos H. Timaran

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Failed fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) requiring a redo F-BEVAR is a rare event. In this study, we report 2 cases of a failed F-BEVAR secondary to a type IIIb endoleak from tears on the fabric graft successfully treated with redo F-BEVAR. This is a technically challenging procedure that requires meticulous planning, advanced imaging technologies and experienced operators. Redo F-BEVAR appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option. However, larger series and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and durability.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	964-970
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Volume	30
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028221098707
State	Published - Dec 2023

Keywords

BEVAR
FEVAR
failed F-BEVAR
thoracoabdominal aneurysm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1177/15266028221098707

Cite this

@article{3480f2066c3f485db2152859edd018da,

title = "Redo Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (F-BEVAR) for Failed F-BEVAR",

abstract = "Failed fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) requiring a redo F-BEVAR is a rare event. In this study, we report 2 cases of a failed F-BEVAR secondary to a type IIIb endoleak from tears on the fabric graft successfully treated with redo F-BEVAR. This is a technically challenging procedure that requires meticulous planning, advanced imaging technologies and experienced operators. Redo F-BEVAR appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option. However, larger series and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and durability.",

keywords = "BEVAR, FEVAR, failed F-BEVAR, thoracoabdominal aneurysm",

author = "Driessen, {Anna L.} and Scott, {Carla K.} and Guardiola, {Gerardo G.} and Baig, {Mirza S.} and Kirkwood, {Melissa L.} and Timaran, {Carlos H.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1177/15266028221098707",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "30",

pages = "964--970",

journal = "Journal of Endovascular Therapy",

issn = "1526-6028",

publisher = "International Society of Endovascular Specialists",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Redo Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (F-BEVAR) for Failed F-BEVAR

AU - Driessen, Anna L.

AU - Scott, Carla K.

AU - Guardiola, Gerardo G.

AU - Baig, Mirza S.

AU - Kirkwood, Melissa L.

AU - Timaran, Carlos H.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - Failed fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) requiring a redo F-BEVAR is a rare event. In this study, we report 2 cases of a failed F-BEVAR secondary to a type IIIb endoleak from tears on the fabric graft successfully treated with redo F-BEVAR. This is a technically challenging procedure that requires meticulous planning, advanced imaging technologies and experienced operators. Redo F-BEVAR appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option. However, larger series and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and durability.

AB - Failed fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) requiring a redo F-BEVAR is a rare event. In this study, we report 2 cases of a failed F-BEVAR secondary to a type IIIb endoleak from tears on the fabric graft successfully treated with redo F-BEVAR. This is a technically challenging procedure that requires meticulous planning, advanced imaging technologies and experienced operators. Redo F-BEVAR appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option. However, larger series and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and durability.

KW - BEVAR

KW - FEVAR

KW - failed F-BEVAR

KW - thoracoabdominal aneurysm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131420506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131420506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/15266028221098707

DO - 10.1177/15266028221098707

M3 - Article

C2 - 35658606

AN - SCOPUS:85131420506

SN - 1526-6028

VL - 30

SP - 964

EP - 970

JO - Journal of Endovascular Therapy

JF - Journal of Endovascular Therapy

IS - 6

ER -

Redo Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (F-BEVAR) for Failed F-BEVAR

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this