Reproducibility in the measurement of atlanto-occipital instability in children with Down syndrome

Lori A. Karol, Eugene G. Sheffield, Kevin Crawford, Marilyn K. Moody, Richard H. Browne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. This study compared the reproducibility of three techniques used to measure translation between the occiput and C1 in children with Down syndrome. Objectives. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were computed to determine if there is a reliable way to measure occiput-C1 instability. Summary of Background Data. No studies have been performed comparing measurement techniques in children with Down syndrome. Methods. Powers ratios, basion-axial intervals, and translational anteroposterior motion as described by Wiesel and Rothman were calculated for 60 pairs of flexion-extension lateral cervical radiographs from children with Down syndrome. Calculations were made on two occasions by four reviewers. Results. Mean differences between measurements for two observers were 0.14 for the Powers ratio, 1.3 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 1.8 mm for the basion- axial interval. The 95th percentiles of the differences between measurements for two observers were 0.38 for Powers ratios, 3.5 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 5.3 mm for the basion-axial interval. Conclusions. Measurement of atlanto-occipital translation by any of these methods is not reproducible. Although the technique by Wiesel and Rothman is the easiest to apply, confirmation of instability with magnetic resonance imaging should guide management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2463-2468
Number of pages6
JournalSpine
Volume21
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1996

Fingerprint

Down Syndrome
Observer Variation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • atlanto-occipital instability
  • Down syndrome
  • reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Reproducibility in the measurement of atlanto-occipital instability in children with Down syndrome. / Karol, Lori A.; Sheffield, Eugene G.; Crawford, Kevin; Moody, Marilyn K.; Browne, Richard H.

In: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 21, 01.11.1996, p. 2463-2468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karol, Lori A. ; Sheffield, Eugene G. ; Crawford, Kevin ; Moody, Marilyn K. ; Browne, Richard H. / Reproducibility in the measurement of atlanto-occipital instability in children with Down syndrome. In: Spine. 1996 ; Vol. 21, No. 21. pp. 2463-2468.
@article{22707b10154d483b9936e741d935c433,
title = "Reproducibility in the measurement of atlanto-occipital instability in children with Down syndrome",
abstract = "Study Design. This study compared the reproducibility of three techniques used to measure translation between the occiput and C1 in children with Down syndrome. Objectives. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were computed to determine if there is a reliable way to measure occiput-C1 instability. Summary of Background Data. No studies have been performed comparing measurement techniques in children with Down syndrome. Methods. Powers ratios, basion-axial intervals, and translational anteroposterior motion as described by Wiesel and Rothman were calculated for 60 pairs of flexion-extension lateral cervical radiographs from children with Down syndrome. Calculations were made on two occasions by four reviewers. Results. Mean differences between measurements for two observers were 0.14 for the Powers ratio, 1.3 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 1.8 mm for the basion- axial interval. The 95th percentiles of the differences between measurements for two observers were 0.38 for Powers ratios, 3.5 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 5.3 mm for the basion-axial interval. Conclusions. Measurement of atlanto-occipital translation by any of these methods is not reproducible. Although the technique by Wiesel and Rothman is the easiest to apply, confirmation of instability with magnetic resonance imaging should guide management.",
keywords = "atlanto-occipital instability, Down syndrome, reliability",
author = "Karol, {Lori A.} and Sheffield, {Eugene G.} and Kevin Crawford and Moody, {Marilyn K.} and Browne, {Richard H.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199611010-00010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "2463--2468",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility in the measurement of atlanto-occipital instability in children with Down syndrome

AU - Karol, Lori A.

AU - Sheffield, Eugene G.

AU - Crawford, Kevin

AU - Moody, Marilyn K.

AU - Browne, Richard H.

PY - 1996/11/1

Y1 - 1996/11/1

N2 - Study Design. This study compared the reproducibility of three techniques used to measure translation between the occiput and C1 in children with Down syndrome. Objectives. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were computed to determine if there is a reliable way to measure occiput-C1 instability. Summary of Background Data. No studies have been performed comparing measurement techniques in children with Down syndrome. Methods. Powers ratios, basion-axial intervals, and translational anteroposterior motion as described by Wiesel and Rothman were calculated for 60 pairs of flexion-extension lateral cervical radiographs from children with Down syndrome. Calculations were made on two occasions by four reviewers. Results. Mean differences between measurements for two observers were 0.14 for the Powers ratio, 1.3 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 1.8 mm for the basion- axial interval. The 95th percentiles of the differences between measurements for two observers were 0.38 for Powers ratios, 3.5 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 5.3 mm for the basion-axial interval. Conclusions. Measurement of atlanto-occipital translation by any of these methods is not reproducible. Although the technique by Wiesel and Rothman is the easiest to apply, confirmation of instability with magnetic resonance imaging should guide management.

AB - Study Design. This study compared the reproducibility of three techniques used to measure translation between the occiput and C1 in children with Down syndrome. Objectives. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were computed to determine if there is a reliable way to measure occiput-C1 instability. Summary of Background Data. No studies have been performed comparing measurement techniques in children with Down syndrome. Methods. Powers ratios, basion-axial intervals, and translational anteroposterior motion as described by Wiesel and Rothman were calculated for 60 pairs of flexion-extension lateral cervical radiographs from children with Down syndrome. Calculations were made on two occasions by four reviewers. Results. Mean differences between measurements for two observers were 0.14 for the Powers ratio, 1.3 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 1.8 mm for the basion- axial interval. The 95th percentiles of the differences between measurements for two observers were 0.38 for Powers ratios, 3.5 mm for the Wiesel technique, and 5.3 mm for the basion-axial interval. Conclusions. Measurement of atlanto-occipital translation by any of these methods is not reproducible. Although the technique by Wiesel and Rothman is the easiest to apply, confirmation of instability with magnetic resonance imaging should guide management.

KW - atlanto-occipital instability

KW - Down syndrome

KW - reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029852261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029852261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00010

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00010

M3 - Article

C2 - 8923632

AN - SCOPUS:0029852261

VL - 21

SP - 2463

EP - 2468

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 21

ER -