Research Integrity and Everyday Practice of Science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Science traditionally is taught as a linear process based on logic and carried out by objective researchers following the scientific method. Practice of science is a far more nuanced enterprise, one in which intuition and passion become just as important as objectivity and logic. Whether the activity is committing to study a particular research problem, drawing conclusions about a hypothesis under investigation, choosing whether to count results as data or experimental noise, or deciding what information to present in a research paper, ethical challenges inevitably will arise because of the ambiguities inherent in practice. Unless these ambiguities are acknowledged and their sources understood explicitly, responsible conduct of science education will not adequately prepare the individuals receiving the training for the kinds of decisions essential to research integrity that they will have to make as scientists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-701
Number of pages17
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Integrity
integrity
Logic
Science Education
Linear Process
science
Research
Intuition
Count
objectivity
intuition
Noise
Education
Research Personnel
Ambiguity
Industry
education
Ethics
Drawing
Teaching

Keywords

  • Philosophy of science
  • Responsible conduct of research
  • Science education
  • Science policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Research Integrity and Everyday Practice of Science. / Grinnell, Frederick.

In: Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 685-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc290d7738c941f998af48116ea665d8,
title = "Research Integrity and Everyday Practice of Science",
abstract = "Science traditionally is taught as a linear process based on logic and carried out by objective researchers following the scientific method. Practice of science is a far more nuanced enterprise, one in which intuition and passion become just as important as objectivity and logic. Whether the activity is committing to study a particular research problem, drawing conclusions about a hypothesis under investigation, choosing whether to count results as data or experimental noise, or deciding what information to present in a research paper, ethical challenges inevitably will arise because of the ambiguities inherent in practice. Unless these ambiguities are acknowledged and their sources understood explicitly, responsible conduct of science education will not adequately prepare the individuals receiving the training for the kinds of decisions essential to research integrity that they will have to make as scientists.",
keywords = "Philosophy of science, Responsible conduct of research, Science education, Science policy",
author = "Frederick Grinnell",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11948-012-9376-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "685--701",
journal = "Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics",
issn = "1660-5446",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Integrity and Everyday Practice of Science

AU - Grinnell, Frederick

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Science traditionally is taught as a linear process based on logic and carried out by objective researchers following the scientific method. Practice of science is a far more nuanced enterprise, one in which intuition and passion become just as important as objectivity and logic. Whether the activity is committing to study a particular research problem, drawing conclusions about a hypothesis under investigation, choosing whether to count results as data or experimental noise, or deciding what information to present in a research paper, ethical challenges inevitably will arise because of the ambiguities inherent in practice. Unless these ambiguities are acknowledged and their sources understood explicitly, responsible conduct of science education will not adequately prepare the individuals receiving the training for the kinds of decisions essential to research integrity that they will have to make as scientists.

AB - Science traditionally is taught as a linear process based on logic and carried out by objective researchers following the scientific method. Practice of science is a far more nuanced enterprise, one in which intuition and passion become just as important as objectivity and logic. Whether the activity is committing to study a particular research problem, drawing conclusions about a hypothesis under investigation, choosing whether to count results as data or experimental noise, or deciding what information to present in a research paper, ethical challenges inevitably will arise because of the ambiguities inherent in practice. Unless these ambiguities are acknowledged and their sources understood explicitly, responsible conduct of science education will not adequately prepare the individuals receiving the training for the kinds of decisions essential to research integrity that they will have to make as scientists.

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Responsible conduct of research

KW - Science education

KW - Science policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883760991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883760991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-012-9376-5

DO - 10.1007/s11948-012-9376-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 22740035

AN - SCOPUS:84883760991

VL - 19

SP - 685

EP - 701

JO - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

JF - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

SN - 1660-5446

IS - 3

ER -