TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of Dynamic Stabilizers of the Elbow in Radiocapitellar Joint Alignment
T2 - A Prospective In Vivo Study
AU - Roebke, Austin J.
AU - Samade, Richard
AU - Altman, Perry
AU - Jain, Sonu A.
AU - Goyal, Kanu S.
AU - Speeckaert, Amy L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Dr Jesse Richards and Dr Michael Kushelev of the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, for their advice on study design and standardization of regional anesthetic protocols for this study. We also thank Dr Hisham Awan for the enrollment of his patients in the study. In addition, we thank Ms Kara Colvell for her assistance in obtaining institutional review board approval and obtaining informed consent from the study participants.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society for Surgery of the Hand
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Purpose: To investigate the effect of dynamic stabilizers of the elbow on radiocapitellar joint alignment, before and after the administration of regional anesthesia. Methods: At a single institution, 14 patients were prospectively enrolled in a study using a within-subjects control design. Before performing a supraclavicular regional block, 10 fluoroscopic images (1 anteroposterior and 9 lateral views) of the elbow were obtained for each patient. The lateral images were obtained with the forearm in maximal supination, neutral rotation, and maximal pronation, and these forearm positions were repeated for 3 elbow positions: (1) full extension; (2) flexion to 90°, with 0° of shoulder internal rotation; and (3) flexion to 90°, with 90° of shoulder internal rotation. After obtaining the 10 initial images, a block was performed to achieve less than 3/5 motor strength of the imaged extremity, followed by obtaining the same 10 images in each patient. Radiocapitellar ratio, defined as the minimal distance between the right bisector of the radial head and the center of the capitellum divided by the diameter of the capitellum, was measured in each image. Results: The 14 patients had a mean age of 47.8 ± 15.7 years, and 10 (71.4%) patients were women. A difference between radiocapitellar ratios measured before and after the regional block administration was observed for all lateral images (−1.0% ± 7.2% to −2.2% ± 8.0%), although this difference was less than the minimum clinically important difference. Conclusions: Paralysis of the dynamic stabilizers of the elbow produces a difference in the radiocapitellar joint alignment, but this did not reach the minimum clinically important difference. Clinical relevance: Paralysis of the dynamic stabilizers of the elbow via a supraclavicular nerve block produces no clinically relevant effect on the radiocapitellar alignment of uninjured elbows.
AB - Purpose: To investigate the effect of dynamic stabilizers of the elbow on radiocapitellar joint alignment, before and after the administration of regional anesthesia. Methods: At a single institution, 14 patients were prospectively enrolled in a study using a within-subjects control design. Before performing a supraclavicular regional block, 10 fluoroscopic images (1 anteroposterior and 9 lateral views) of the elbow were obtained for each patient. The lateral images were obtained with the forearm in maximal supination, neutral rotation, and maximal pronation, and these forearm positions were repeated for 3 elbow positions: (1) full extension; (2) flexion to 90°, with 0° of shoulder internal rotation; and (3) flexion to 90°, with 90° of shoulder internal rotation. After obtaining the 10 initial images, a block was performed to achieve less than 3/5 motor strength of the imaged extremity, followed by obtaining the same 10 images in each patient. Radiocapitellar ratio, defined as the minimal distance between the right bisector of the radial head and the center of the capitellum divided by the diameter of the capitellum, was measured in each image. Results: The 14 patients had a mean age of 47.8 ± 15.7 years, and 10 (71.4%) patients were women. A difference between radiocapitellar ratios measured before and after the regional block administration was observed for all lateral images (−1.0% ± 7.2% to −2.2% ± 8.0%), although this difference was less than the minimum clinically important difference. Conclusions: Paralysis of the dynamic stabilizers of the elbow produces a difference in the radiocapitellar joint alignment, but this did not reach the minimum clinically important difference. Clinical relevance: Paralysis of the dynamic stabilizers of the elbow via a supraclavicular nerve block produces no clinically relevant effect on the radiocapitellar alignment of uninjured elbows.
KW - Dynamic stabilizers
KW - elbow
KW - radiocapitellar joint
KW - radiocapitellar ratio
KW - regional anesthesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127312003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127312003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.01.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.01.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 35337695
AN - SCOPUS:85127312003
SN - 0363-5023
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
ER -