Role of non-coplanar beams in IMRT

A. Pugachev, J. G. Li, A. L. Boyer, L. Xing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We have investigated the benefits of using non-coplanar beams with optimized directions for intensity modulated radiation therapy. We have considered three typical cases of localized prostate cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, and paraspinal treatment. Nine fields were used for each treatment. For all cases, three types of treatment plan optimization were done: (1) nine uniformly spaced coplanar beams with optimized beam intensity profiles; (2) beam orientations and beam profiles were optimized, but only coplanar beams were allowed; (3) similar to (2), except that non-coplanar beams were allowed during beam orientation optimization. Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and an iterative optimization algorithm was used for beam intensity profile optimization. For the localized prostate case, all three types of optimization described above resulted in a dose distribution of similar quality. For the nasopharyngeal case, optimized non-coplanar beams provided a significant improvement in GTV coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization of non-coplanar beams resulted in significant improvement of kidney sparing and in increased GTV coverage. It is concluded that the use of non-coplanar beams with optimized orientations presents a viable option to improve target coverage and critical structure sparing in complicated cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-459
Number of pages4
JournalAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings
Volume1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Fingerprint

Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
Prostate
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Therapeutics
Kidney
Simulated annealing
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Beam orientation selection
  • IMRT
  • Non-coplanar beams
  • Optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering

Cite this

Role of non-coplanar beams in IMRT. / Pugachev, A.; Li, J. G.; Boyer, A. L.; Xing, L.

In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings, Vol. 1, 01.12.2000, p. 456-459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4cac99e462724257be7948be9b22678a,
title = "Role of non-coplanar beams in IMRT",
abstract = "We have investigated the benefits of using non-coplanar beams with optimized directions for intensity modulated radiation therapy. We have considered three typical cases of localized prostate cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, and paraspinal treatment. Nine fields were used for each treatment. For all cases, three types of treatment plan optimization were done: (1) nine uniformly spaced coplanar beams with optimized beam intensity profiles; (2) beam orientations and beam profiles were optimized, but only coplanar beams were allowed; (3) similar to (2), except that non-coplanar beams were allowed during beam orientation optimization. Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and an iterative optimization algorithm was used for beam intensity profile optimization. For the localized prostate case, all three types of optimization described above resulted in a dose distribution of similar quality. For the nasopharyngeal case, optimized non-coplanar beams provided a significant improvement in GTV coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization of non-coplanar beams resulted in significant improvement of kidney sparing and in increased GTV coverage. It is concluded that the use of non-coplanar beams with optimized orientations presents a viable option to improve target coverage and critical structure sparing in complicated cases.",
keywords = "Beam orientation selection, IMRT, Non-coplanar beams, Optimization",
author = "A. Pugachev and Li, {J. G.} and Boyer, {A. L.} and L. Xing",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "456--459",
journal = "Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference",
issn = "1557-170X",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of non-coplanar beams in IMRT

AU - Pugachev, A.

AU - Li, J. G.

AU - Boyer, A. L.

AU - Xing, L.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - We have investigated the benefits of using non-coplanar beams with optimized directions for intensity modulated radiation therapy. We have considered three typical cases of localized prostate cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, and paraspinal treatment. Nine fields were used for each treatment. For all cases, three types of treatment plan optimization were done: (1) nine uniformly spaced coplanar beams with optimized beam intensity profiles; (2) beam orientations and beam profiles were optimized, but only coplanar beams were allowed; (3) similar to (2), except that non-coplanar beams were allowed during beam orientation optimization. Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and an iterative optimization algorithm was used for beam intensity profile optimization. For the localized prostate case, all three types of optimization described above resulted in a dose distribution of similar quality. For the nasopharyngeal case, optimized non-coplanar beams provided a significant improvement in GTV coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization of non-coplanar beams resulted in significant improvement of kidney sparing and in increased GTV coverage. It is concluded that the use of non-coplanar beams with optimized orientations presents a viable option to improve target coverage and critical structure sparing in complicated cases.

AB - We have investigated the benefits of using non-coplanar beams with optimized directions for intensity modulated radiation therapy. We have considered three typical cases of localized prostate cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, and paraspinal treatment. Nine fields were used for each treatment. For all cases, three types of treatment plan optimization were done: (1) nine uniformly spaced coplanar beams with optimized beam intensity profiles; (2) beam orientations and beam profiles were optimized, but only coplanar beams were allowed; (3) similar to (2), except that non-coplanar beams were allowed during beam orientation optimization. Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and an iterative optimization algorithm was used for beam intensity profile optimization. For the localized prostate case, all three types of optimization described above resulted in a dose distribution of similar quality. For the nasopharyngeal case, optimized non-coplanar beams provided a significant improvement in GTV coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization of non-coplanar beams resulted in significant improvement of kidney sparing and in increased GTV coverage. It is concluded that the use of non-coplanar beams with optimized orientations presents a viable option to improve target coverage and critical structure sparing in complicated cases.

KW - Beam orientation selection

KW - IMRT

KW - Non-coplanar beams

KW - Optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034441047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034441047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 456

EP - 459

JO - Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference

JF - Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference

SN - 1557-170X

ER -