Safety of Manual Morcellation After Vaginal or Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

Sunil Balgobin, Pedro A. Maldonado, Kathleen Chin, Joseph I. Schaffer, Cherine A. Hamid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

StudyObjective: To determine the safety of manual vaginal morcellation by evaluating the rates of incidental uterine malignancy and manual vaginal morcellation after vaginal or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Design: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Patients: Women (n=1,629) undergoing vaginal or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Interventions: Vaginal hysterectomy (n=1,091) or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n=538) with and without scalpel morcellation. Measurements and Main Results: The number of uterine malignancies, rate of vaginal morcellation, surgical indications, pathology diagnoses, and uterine weights were evaluated. Chi-square analysis was used to compare categoric data, and analysis of variance was used to compare uterine weights. There were no cases of leiomyosarcomas. There were 2 other sarcomas, 4 smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential, and 8 endometrial adenocarcinomas. The vaginal morcellation rate was 19.4%, but no malignancy was morcellated. Myomas were more common preoperatively and histologically in morcellated specimens. Mean (± standard deviation) uterine weights for morcellated versus nonmorcellated laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy specimens were 285.5±159.3 versus 140.1±83.6g (p

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 3 2015

Keywords

  • Incidental malignancy
  • Morcellation
  • Vaginal hysterectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Safety of Manual Morcellation After Vaginal or Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this