TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex differences in the ventilatory responses to exercise in mild to moderate obesity
AU - Bhammar, Dharini M.
AU - Balmain, Bryce N.
AU - Babb, Tony G.
AU - Bernhardt, Vipa
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Todd Bassett, Raksa Moran, Rubria Marines‐Price, Santiago Lorenzo, Matthew Spencer, Jonathon Stickford, Joseph Genovese, Jessica Alcala, Maria Roman, Andreas Kreutzer, and Sarah Haller‐Martineau for their assistance in various stages of this project. Funding was provided by NIH R01 HL096782‐01A2, King Charitable Foundation Trust, Cain Foundation, and Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas. The sponsors had no input or contributions in the development of the research and manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - New Findings: What is the central question of the study? What are the sex differences in ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with obesity? What is the main finding and its importance? Tidal volume and expiratory flows are lower in females when compared with males at higher levels of ventilation despite small increases in end-expiratory lung volumes. Since dyspnoea on exertion is a frequent complaint, particularly in females with obesity, careful attention should be paid to unpleasant respiratory symptoms and mechanical ventilatory constraints while prescribing exercise. Abstract: Obesity is associated with altered ventilatory responses, which may be exacerbated in females due to the functional consequences of sex-related morphological differences in the respiratory system. This study examined sex differences in ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with obesity. Healthy adults with obesity (n = 73; 48 females) underwent pulmonary function testing, underwater weighing, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a graded exercise test to exhaustion, and two constant work rate exercise tests; one at a fixed work rate (60 W for females and 105 W for males) and one at a relative intensity (50% of peak oxygen uptake, (Formula presented.)). Metabolic, respiratory and perceptual responses were assessed during exercise. Compared with males, females used a smaller proportion of their ventilatory capacity at peak exercise (69.13 ± 14.49 vs. 77.41 ± 17.06% maximum voluntary ventilation, P = 0.0374). Females also utilized a smaller proportion of their forced vital capacity (FVC) at peak exercise (tidal volume: 48.51 ± 9.29 vs. 54.12 ± 10.43%FVC, P = 0.0218). End-expiratory lung volumes were 2–4% higher in females compared with males during exercise (P < 0.05), while end-inspiratory lung volumes were similar. Since the males were initiating inspiration from a lower lung volume, they experienced greater expiratory flow limitation during exercise. Ratings of perceived breathlessness during exercise were similar between females and males at comparable levels of ventilation. In summary, sex differences in the manifestations of obesity-related mechanical ventilatory constraints were observed. Since dyspnoea on exertion is a common complaint in patients with obesity, particularly in females, exercise prescriptions should be tailored with the goal of minimizing unpleasant respiratory sensations.
AB - New Findings: What is the central question of the study? What are the sex differences in ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with obesity? What is the main finding and its importance? Tidal volume and expiratory flows are lower in females when compared with males at higher levels of ventilation despite small increases in end-expiratory lung volumes. Since dyspnoea on exertion is a frequent complaint, particularly in females with obesity, careful attention should be paid to unpleasant respiratory symptoms and mechanical ventilatory constraints while prescribing exercise. Abstract: Obesity is associated with altered ventilatory responses, which may be exacerbated in females due to the functional consequences of sex-related morphological differences in the respiratory system. This study examined sex differences in ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with obesity. Healthy adults with obesity (n = 73; 48 females) underwent pulmonary function testing, underwater weighing, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a graded exercise test to exhaustion, and two constant work rate exercise tests; one at a fixed work rate (60 W for females and 105 W for males) and one at a relative intensity (50% of peak oxygen uptake, (Formula presented.)). Metabolic, respiratory and perceptual responses were assessed during exercise. Compared with males, females used a smaller proportion of their ventilatory capacity at peak exercise (69.13 ± 14.49 vs. 77.41 ± 17.06% maximum voluntary ventilation, P = 0.0374). Females also utilized a smaller proportion of their forced vital capacity (FVC) at peak exercise (tidal volume: 48.51 ± 9.29 vs. 54.12 ± 10.43%FVC, P = 0.0218). End-expiratory lung volumes were 2–4% higher in females compared with males during exercise (P < 0.05), while end-inspiratory lung volumes were similar. Since the males were initiating inspiration from a lower lung volume, they experienced greater expiratory flow limitation during exercise. Ratings of perceived breathlessness during exercise were similar between females and males at comparable levels of ventilation. In summary, sex differences in the manifestations of obesity-related mechanical ventilatory constraints were observed. Since dyspnoea on exertion is a common complaint in patients with obesity, particularly in females, exercise prescriptions should be tailored with the goal of minimizing unpleasant respiratory sensations.
KW - breathing limitations
KW - dynamic hyperinflation
KW - dyspnoea
KW - expiratory flow limitation
KW - operating lung volumes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134191521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134191521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1113/EP090309
DO - 10.1113/EP090309
M3 - Article
C2 - 35771362
AN - SCOPUS:85134191521
SN - 0958-0670
JO - Experimental Physiology
JF - Experimental Physiology
ER -