Silicone allergy: A new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management

Larisa D. Kunda, Katrina R. Stidham, Michelle M. Inserra, Peter S. Roland, Daniel Franklin, Joseph B. Roberson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We introduce silicone allergy as a rare cause for cochlear implant extrusion and discuss its management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series and literature review. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Primary eligibility criteria included patients who experienced a delayed extrusion of their cochlear implants with negative wound cultures and had a suspected or a test-proven allergy to silicone components of an implant. INTERVENTIONS: Silicone allergy testing, explantation of a cochlear implant containing allergenic silicone materials, reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. OUTCOME MEASURES: Uneventful wound healing and extrusion-free long-term follow-up after the reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. RESULTS: Three known cases of cochlear implant extrusion as a result of silicone allergy have been noted from 1991 through 2004 in three cochlear implant programs in the United States. All three devices extruded, resulting in explantation of the old device and reimplantation with a new custom-made device eliminating the allergenic silicone component. Wound cultures were negative in all cases. All three patients experienced a delayed extrusion of their devices. Two of these patients had a test-proven allergy to the implant's silicone components, whereas the third patient was presumed to have a hypersensitivity solely on the basis of a clinical presentation. CONCLUSION: We propose that silicone allergy is a rare cause of cochlear implant extrusion. Patients experiencing cochlear implant extrusion, particularly with a delayed onset and negative wound culture results, should be tested for silicone allergy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1078-1082
Number of pages5
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Silicones
Hypersensitivity
Replantation
Equipment and Supplies
Wounds and Injuries
Tertiary Care Centers
Wound Healing

Keywords

  • Allergy testing kits
  • Cochlear implant
  • Delayed extrusion
  • Silicone allergy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Kunda, L. D., Stidham, K. R., Inserra, M. M., Roland, P. S., Franklin, D., & Roberson, J. B. (2006). Silicone allergy: A new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management. Otology and Neurotology, 27(8), 1078-1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000235378.64654.4d

Silicone allergy : A new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management. / Kunda, Larisa D.; Stidham, Katrina R.; Inserra, Michelle M.; Roland, Peter S.; Franklin, Daniel; Roberson, Joseph B.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 27, No. 8, 12.2006, p. 1078-1082.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kunda, LD, Stidham, KR, Inserra, MM, Roland, PS, Franklin, D & Roberson, JB 2006, 'Silicone allergy: A new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management', Otology and Neurotology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1078-1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000235378.64654.4d
Kunda, Larisa D. ; Stidham, Katrina R. ; Inserra, Michelle M. ; Roland, Peter S. ; Franklin, Daniel ; Roberson, Joseph B. / Silicone allergy : A new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2006 ; Vol. 27, No. 8. pp. 1078-1082.
@article{554b34fa9b7147d39c08599034bccf0b,
title = "Silicone allergy: A new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: We introduce silicone allergy as a rare cause for cochlear implant extrusion and discuss its management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series and literature review. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Primary eligibility criteria included patients who experienced a delayed extrusion of their cochlear implants with negative wound cultures and had a suspected or a test-proven allergy to silicone components of an implant. INTERVENTIONS: Silicone allergy testing, explantation of a cochlear implant containing allergenic silicone materials, reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. OUTCOME MEASURES: Uneventful wound healing and extrusion-free long-term follow-up after the reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. RESULTS: Three known cases of cochlear implant extrusion as a result of silicone allergy have been noted from 1991 through 2004 in three cochlear implant programs in the United States. All three devices extruded, resulting in explantation of the old device and reimplantation with a new custom-made device eliminating the allergenic silicone component. Wound cultures were negative in all cases. All three patients experienced a delayed extrusion of their devices. Two of these patients had a test-proven allergy to the implant's silicone components, whereas the third patient was presumed to have a hypersensitivity solely on the basis of a clinical presentation. CONCLUSION: We propose that silicone allergy is a rare cause of cochlear implant extrusion. Patients experiencing cochlear implant extrusion, particularly with a delayed onset and negative wound culture results, should be tested for silicone allergy.",
keywords = "Allergy testing kits, Cochlear implant, Delayed extrusion, Silicone allergy",
author = "Kunda, {Larisa D.} and Stidham, {Katrina R.} and Inserra, {Michelle M.} and Roland, {Peter S.} and Daniel Franklin and Roberson, {Joseph B.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/01.mao.0000235378.64654.4d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1078--1082",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Silicone allergy

T2 - A new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management

AU - Kunda, Larisa D.

AU - Stidham, Katrina R.

AU - Inserra, Michelle M.

AU - Roland, Peter S.

AU - Franklin, Daniel

AU - Roberson, Joseph B.

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE: We introduce silicone allergy as a rare cause for cochlear implant extrusion and discuss its management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series and literature review. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Primary eligibility criteria included patients who experienced a delayed extrusion of their cochlear implants with negative wound cultures and had a suspected or a test-proven allergy to silicone components of an implant. INTERVENTIONS: Silicone allergy testing, explantation of a cochlear implant containing allergenic silicone materials, reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. OUTCOME MEASURES: Uneventful wound healing and extrusion-free long-term follow-up after the reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. RESULTS: Three known cases of cochlear implant extrusion as a result of silicone allergy have been noted from 1991 through 2004 in three cochlear implant programs in the United States. All three devices extruded, resulting in explantation of the old device and reimplantation with a new custom-made device eliminating the allergenic silicone component. Wound cultures were negative in all cases. All three patients experienced a delayed extrusion of their devices. Two of these patients had a test-proven allergy to the implant's silicone components, whereas the third patient was presumed to have a hypersensitivity solely on the basis of a clinical presentation. CONCLUSION: We propose that silicone allergy is a rare cause of cochlear implant extrusion. Patients experiencing cochlear implant extrusion, particularly with a delayed onset and negative wound culture results, should be tested for silicone allergy.

AB - OBJECTIVE: We introduce silicone allergy as a rare cause for cochlear implant extrusion and discuss its management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series and literature review. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Primary eligibility criteria included patients who experienced a delayed extrusion of their cochlear implants with negative wound cultures and had a suspected or a test-proven allergy to silicone components of an implant. INTERVENTIONS: Silicone allergy testing, explantation of a cochlear implant containing allergenic silicone materials, reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. OUTCOME MEASURES: Uneventful wound healing and extrusion-free long-term follow-up after the reimplantation with a custom-made cochlear implant excluding an allergenic silicone component. RESULTS: Three known cases of cochlear implant extrusion as a result of silicone allergy have been noted from 1991 through 2004 in three cochlear implant programs in the United States. All three devices extruded, resulting in explantation of the old device and reimplantation with a new custom-made device eliminating the allergenic silicone component. Wound cultures were negative in all cases. All three patients experienced a delayed extrusion of their devices. Two of these patients had a test-proven allergy to the implant's silicone components, whereas the third patient was presumed to have a hypersensitivity solely on the basis of a clinical presentation. CONCLUSION: We propose that silicone allergy is a rare cause of cochlear implant extrusion. Patients experiencing cochlear implant extrusion, particularly with a delayed onset and negative wound culture results, should be tested for silicone allergy.

KW - Allergy testing kits

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Delayed extrusion

KW - Silicone allergy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845247102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845247102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mao.0000235378.64654.4d

DO - 10.1097/01.mao.0000235378.64654.4d

M3 - Article

C2 - 17130797

AN - SCOPUS:33845247102

VL - 27

SP - 1078

EP - 1082

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 8

ER -