Spending more, doing more, or both? An alternative method for quantifying utilization during hospitalizations

Tara Lagu, Harlan M. Krumholz, Kumar Dharmarajan, Chohreh Partovian, Nancy Kim, Purav S. Mody, Shu Xia Li, Kelly M. Strait, Peter K. Lindenauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because relative value unit (RVU)-based costs vary across hospitals, it is difficult to use them to compare hospital utilization. OBJECTIVE: To compare estimates of hospital utilization using RVU-based costs and standardized costs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Years 2009 to 2010 heart failure hospitalizations in a large, detailed hospital billing database that contains an itemized log of costs incurred during hospitalization. INTERVENTION: We assigned every item in the database with a standardized cost that was consistent for that item across all hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Standardized costs of hospitalization versus RVU-based costs of hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 234 hospitals with 165,647 heart failure hospitalizations. We observed variation in the RVU-based cost for a uniform "basket of goods" (10th percentile cost $1,552; 90th percentile cost of $3,967). The interquartile ratio (Q75/Q25) of the RVU-based costs of a hospitalization was 1.35 but fell to 1.26 after costs were standardized, suggesting that the use of standardized costs can reduce the "noise" due to differences in overhead and other fixed costs. Forty-six (20%) hospitals had reported costs of hospitalizations exceeding standardized costs (indicating that reported costs inflated apparent utilization); 42 hospitals (17%) had reported costs that were less than standardized costs (indicating that reported costs underestimated utilization). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized costs are a novel method for comparing utilization across hospitals and reduce variation observed with RVU-based costs. They have the potential to help hospitals understand how they use resources compared to their peers and will facilitate research comparing the effectiveness of higher and lower utilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-379
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of hospital medicine
Volume8
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Hospitalization
Costs and Cost Analysis
Heart Failure
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Internal Medicine
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Cite this

Spending more, doing more, or both? An alternative method for quantifying utilization during hospitalizations. / Lagu, Tara; Krumholz, Harlan M.; Dharmarajan, Kumar; Partovian, Chohreh; Kim, Nancy; Mody, Purav S.; Li, Shu Xia; Strait, Kelly M.; Lindenauer, Peter K.

In: Journal of hospital medicine, Vol. 8, No. 7, 01.07.2013, p. 373-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lagu, T, Krumholz, HM, Dharmarajan, K, Partovian, C, Kim, N, Mody, PS, Li, SX, Strait, KM & Lindenauer, PK 2013, 'Spending more, doing more, or both? An alternative method for quantifying utilization during hospitalizations', Journal of hospital medicine, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2046
Lagu, Tara ; Krumholz, Harlan M. ; Dharmarajan, Kumar ; Partovian, Chohreh ; Kim, Nancy ; Mody, Purav S. ; Li, Shu Xia ; Strait, Kelly M. ; Lindenauer, Peter K. / Spending more, doing more, or both? An alternative method for quantifying utilization during hospitalizations. In: Journal of hospital medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 7. pp. 373-379.
@article{9d1dbc4275044920ada98fd6ee3d0af8,
title = "Spending more, doing more, or both? An alternative method for quantifying utilization during hospitalizations",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Because relative value unit (RVU)-based costs vary across hospitals, it is difficult to use them to compare hospital utilization. OBJECTIVE: To compare estimates of hospital utilization using RVU-based costs and standardized costs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Years 2009 to 2010 heart failure hospitalizations in a large, detailed hospital billing database that contains an itemized log of costs incurred during hospitalization. INTERVENTION: We assigned every item in the database with a standardized cost that was consistent for that item across all hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Standardized costs of hospitalization versus RVU-based costs of hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 234 hospitals with 165,647 heart failure hospitalizations. We observed variation in the RVU-based cost for a uniform {"}basket of goods{"} (10th percentile cost $1,552; 90th percentile cost of $3,967). The interquartile ratio (Q75/Q25) of the RVU-based costs of a hospitalization was 1.35 but fell to 1.26 after costs were standardized, suggesting that the use of standardized costs can reduce the {"}noise{"} due to differences in overhead and other fixed costs. Forty-six (20{\%}) hospitals had reported costs of hospitalizations exceeding standardized costs (indicating that reported costs inflated apparent utilization); 42 hospitals (17{\%}) had reported costs that were less than standardized costs (indicating that reported costs underestimated utilization). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized costs are a novel method for comparing utilization across hospitals and reduce variation observed with RVU-based costs. They have the potential to help hospitals understand how they use resources compared to their peers and will facilitate research comparing the effectiveness of higher and lower utilization.",
author = "Tara Lagu and Krumholz, {Harlan M.} and Kumar Dharmarajan and Chohreh Partovian and Nancy Kim and Mody, {Purav S.} and Li, {Shu Xia} and Strait, {Kelly M.} and Lindenauer, {Peter K.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jhm.2046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "373--379",
journal = "Journal of hospital medicine (Online)",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spending more, doing more, or both? An alternative method for quantifying utilization during hospitalizations

AU - Lagu, Tara

AU - Krumholz, Harlan M.

AU - Dharmarajan, Kumar

AU - Partovian, Chohreh

AU - Kim, Nancy

AU - Mody, Purav S.

AU - Li, Shu Xia

AU - Strait, Kelly M.

AU - Lindenauer, Peter K.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Because relative value unit (RVU)-based costs vary across hospitals, it is difficult to use them to compare hospital utilization. OBJECTIVE: To compare estimates of hospital utilization using RVU-based costs and standardized costs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Years 2009 to 2010 heart failure hospitalizations in a large, detailed hospital billing database that contains an itemized log of costs incurred during hospitalization. INTERVENTION: We assigned every item in the database with a standardized cost that was consistent for that item across all hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Standardized costs of hospitalization versus RVU-based costs of hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 234 hospitals with 165,647 heart failure hospitalizations. We observed variation in the RVU-based cost for a uniform "basket of goods" (10th percentile cost $1,552; 90th percentile cost of $3,967). The interquartile ratio (Q75/Q25) of the RVU-based costs of a hospitalization was 1.35 but fell to 1.26 after costs were standardized, suggesting that the use of standardized costs can reduce the "noise" due to differences in overhead and other fixed costs. Forty-six (20%) hospitals had reported costs of hospitalizations exceeding standardized costs (indicating that reported costs inflated apparent utilization); 42 hospitals (17%) had reported costs that were less than standardized costs (indicating that reported costs underestimated utilization). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized costs are a novel method for comparing utilization across hospitals and reduce variation observed with RVU-based costs. They have the potential to help hospitals understand how they use resources compared to their peers and will facilitate research comparing the effectiveness of higher and lower utilization.

AB - BACKGROUND: Because relative value unit (RVU)-based costs vary across hospitals, it is difficult to use them to compare hospital utilization. OBJECTIVE: To compare estimates of hospital utilization using RVU-based costs and standardized costs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Years 2009 to 2010 heart failure hospitalizations in a large, detailed hospital billing database that contains an itemized log of costs incurred during hospitalization. INTERVENTION: We assigned every item in the database with a standardized cost that was consistent for that item across all hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Standardized costs of hospitalization versus RVU-based costs of hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 234 hospitals with 165,647 heart failure hospitalizations. We observed variation in the RVU-based cost for a uniform "basket of goods" (10th percentile cost $1,552; 90th percentile cost of $3,967). The interquartile ratio (Q75/Q25) of the RVU-based costs of a hospitalization was 1.35 but fell to 1.26 after costs were standardized, suggesting that the use of standardized costs can reduce the "noise" due to differences in overhead and other fixed costs. Forty-six (20%) hospitals had reported costs of hospitalizations exceeding standardized costs (indicating that reported costs inflated apparent utilization); 42 hospitals (17%) had reported costs that were less than standardized costs (indicating that reported costs underestimated utilization). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized costs are a novel method for comparing utilization across hospitals and reduce variation observed with RVU-based costs. They have the potential to help hospitals understand how they use resources compared to their peers and will facilitate research comparing the effectiveness of higher and lower utilization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880513264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880513264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jhm.2046

DO - 10.1002/jhm.2046

M3 - Article

C2 - 23757115

AN - SCOPUS:84880513264

VL - 8

SP - 373

EP - 379

JO - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

JF - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 7

ER -