Stability of external circular fixation: A multi-variable biomechanical analysis

Dwight G. Bronson, Mikhail L. Samchukov, John G. Birch, Richard H. Browne, Richard B. Ashman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine how the manipulation of the parameters of fixation and components of the circular external frame could improve and maintain optimal stability of bone fragments. Design. We performed a multi-parametric biomechanical analysis of the extrinsic parameters effecting bone fragment stabilization. Results of testing are presented as a percent change in stiffness due to the manipulation of frame components and their interaction with other fixation parameters. Background. Although there have been investigations of the biomechanical characteristics of circular external fixation, they have been limited to either individual frame components or full frame comparisons. Therefore, these studies did not provide a comprehensive understanding of how the manipulation of circular fixator components influences bone fragment stability. Methods. Mechanical testing was performed in three phases examining the effect of numerous components including ring diameter, wire angle, ring separation, etc. on axial, torsional and bending stiffness. Results. For phase I (single ring) and phase II (double-ring block), ring diameter was the most significant factor affecting axial and torsional stiffness, while wire angle, ring separation, and their interaction had the most influence on bending stiffness. Phase III (two double-ring blocks) showed that ring positioning with respect to the osteotomy site had the most affect on bending and torsional stiffness while axial stiffness was non-linear and dependent upon the applied load. Conclusions. The stability of bone fragments within a circular external fixator is affected by manipulation of the parameters of fixation or individual components of the frame. The contribution of each component to overall bone fragment stability is dependent upon the mode of loading. The changes in overall stability of bone fragments are dependent not only on the individual frame components but also upon their interaction with other parameters of fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-448
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1998

Fingerprint

Bone and Bones
External Fixators
Osteotomy

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Bone fragment fixation
  • External circular fixation
  • Ilizarov
  • Orthopedics
  • Stiffness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Stability of external circular fixation : A multi-variable biomechanical analysis. / Bronson, Dwight G.; Samchukov, Mikhail L.; Birch, John G.; Browne, Richard H.; Ashman, Richard B.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 13, No. 6, 09.1998, p. 441-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bronson, Dwight G. ; Samchukov, Mikhail L. ; Birch, John G. ; Browne, Richard H. ; Ashman, Richard B. / Stability of external circular fixation : A multi-variable biomechanical analysis. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 1998 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 441-448.
@article{4af9dd4e6bc944fe9c8c4ec4fdbe9536,
title = "Stability of external circular fixation: A multi-variable biomechanical analysis",
abstract = "Objective. To determine how the manipulation of the parameters of fixation and components of the circular external frame could improve and maintain optimal stability of bone fragments. Design. We performed a multi-parametric biomechanical analysis of the extrinsic parameters effecting bone fragment stabilization. Results of testing are presented as a percent change in stiffness due to the manipulation of frame components and their interaction with other fixation parameters. Background. Although there have been investigations of the biomechanical characteristics of circular external fixation, they have been limited to either individual frame components or full frame comparisons. Therefore, these studies did not provide a comprehensive understanding of how the manipulation of circular fixator components influences bone fragment stability. Methods. Mechanical testing was performed in three phases examining the effect of numerous components including ring diameter, wire angle, ring separation, etc. on axial, torsional and bending stiffness. Results. For phase I (single ring) and phase II (double-ring block), ring diameter was the most significant factor affecting axial and torsional stiffness, while wire angle, ring separation, and their interaction had the most influence on bending stiffness. Phase III (two double-ring blocks) showed that ring positioning with respect to the osteotomy site had the most affect on bending and torsional stiffness while axial stiffness was non-linear and dependent upon the applied load. Conclusions. The stability of bone fragments within a circular external fixator is affected by manipulation of the parameters of fixation or individual components of the frame. The contribution of each component to overall bone fragment stability is dependent upon the mode of loading. The changes in overall stability of bone fragments are dependent not only on the individual frame components but also upon their interaction with other parameters of fixation.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Bone fragment fixation, External circular fixation, Ilizarov, Orthopedics, Stiffness",
author = "Bronson, {Dwight G.} and Samchukov, {Mikhail L.} and Birch, {John G.} and Browne, {Richard H.} and Ashman, {Richard B.}",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00007-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "441--448",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stability of external circular fixation

T2 - A multi-variable biomechanical analysis

AU - Bronson, Dwight G.

AU - Samchukov, Mikhail L.

AU - Birch, John G.

AU - Browne, Richard H.

AU - Ashman, Richard B.

PY - 1998/9

Y1 - 1998/9

N2 - Objective. To determine how the manipulation of the parameters of fixation and components of the circular external frame could improve and maintain optimal stability of bone fragments. Design. We performed a multi-parametric biomechanical analysis of the extrinsic parameters effecting bone fragment stabilization. Results of testing are presented as a percent change in stiffness due to the manipulation of frame components and their interaction with other fixation parameters. Background. Although there have been investigations of the biomechanical characteristics of circular external fixation, they have been limited to either individual frame components or full frame comparisons. Therefore, these studies did not provide a comprehensive understanding of how the manipulation of circular fixator components influences bone fragment stability. Methods. Mechanical testing was performed in three phases examining the effect of numerous components including ring diameter, wire angle, ring separation, etc. on axial, torsional and bending stiffness. Results. For phase I (single ring) and phase II (double-ring block), ring diameter was the most significant factor affecting axial and torsional stiffness, while wire angle, ring separation, and their interaction had the most influence on bending stiffness. Phase III (two double-ring blocks) showed that ring positioning with respect to the osteotomy site had the most affect on bending and torsional stiffness while axial stiffness was non-linear and dependent upon the applied load. Conclusions. The stability of bone fragments within a circular external fixator is affected by manipulation of the parameters of fixation or individual components of the frame. The contribution of each component to overall bone fragment stability is dependent upon the mode of loading. The changes in overall stability of bone fragments are dependent not only on the individual frame components but also upon their interaction with other parameters of fixation.

AB - Objective. To determine how the manipulation of the parameters of fixation and components of the circular external frame could improve and maintain optimal stability of bone fragments. Design. We performed a multi-parametric biomechanical analysis of the extrinsic parameters effecting bone fragment stabilization. Results of testing are presented as a percent change in stiffness due to the manipulation of frame components and their interaction with other fixation parameters. Background. Although there have been investigations of the biomechanical characteristics of circular external fixation, they have been limited to either individual frame components or full frame comparisons. Therefore, these studies did not provide a comprehensive understanding of how the manipulation of circular fixator components influences bone fragment stability. Methods. Mechanical testing was performed in three phases examining the effect of numerous components including ring diameter, wire angle, ring separation, etc. on axial, torsional and bending stiffness. Results. For phase I (single ring) and phase II (double-ring block), ring diameter was the most significant factor affecting axial and torsional stiffness, while wire angle, ring separation, and their interaction had the most influence on bending stiffness. Phase III (two double-ring blocks) showed that ring positioning with respect to the osteotomy site had the most affect on bending and torsional stiffness while axial stiffness was non-linear and dependent upon the applied load. Conclusions. The stability of bone fragments within a circular external fixator is affected by manipulation of the parameters of fixation or individual components of the frame. The contribution of each component to overall bone fragment stability is dependent upon the mode of loading. The changes in overall stability of bone fragments are dependent not only on the individual frame components but also upon their interaction with other parameters of fixation.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Bone fragment fixation

KW - External circular fixation

KW - Ilizarov

KW - Orthopedics

KW - Stiffness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032169775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032169775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00007-2

DO - 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00007-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032169775

VL - 13

SP - 441

EP - 448

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 6

ER -