TY - JOUR
T1 - Subclinical tremor in normal controls with versus without a family history of essential tremor
T2 - Data from the United States and Turkey
AU - Louis, E. D.
AU - Dogu, O.
AU - Ottman, R.
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Background and purpose: Mild action tremor is very common in the population. One fundamental question is whether this tremor is related to the neurological disease essential tremor (ET), which occurs in a much smaller segment of the population? ET is often genetic, and variable phenotypic expression is well-documented in the literature. We determined whether normal controls who report a family history of ET have greater action tremor than normal controls who do not report such a history. Methods: Controls, enrolled in two epidemiological studies (New York and Turkey), were examined in detail and action tremor was rated using a valid and reliable clinical rating scale, resulting in a total tremor score (range 0-36). Results: In New York, the total tremor score was higher in 44/406 (10.8%) controls who reported a family history of ET than in 362/406 controls with no such history (4.25 ± 2.51 vs. 3.78 ± 2.93, P = 0.02). Controls who reported a first-degree relative with ET had the highest total tremor scores. In Turkey, the total tremor score was higher in 7/89 (7.9%) controls with a family history than in 82/89 controls with no family history (3.43 ± 4.54 vs. 1.13 ± 2.54, P = 0.048). All affected relatives in Turkey were first-degree. Conclusions: These data suggest that some of the normal tremor exhibited by people in the population is likely to be subclinical, partially expressed ET and that the sphere of ET is wider than is apparent from a consideration of clinically diagnosed cases.
AB - Background and purpose: Mild action tremor is very common in the population. One fundamental question is whether this tremor is related to the neurological disease essential tremor (ET), which occurs in a much smaller segment of the population? ET is often genetic, and variable phenotypic expression is well-documented in the literature. We determined whether normal controls who report a family history of ET have greater action tremor than normal controls who do not report such a history. Methods: Controls, enrolled in two epidemiological studies (New York and Turkey), were examined in detail and action tremor was rated using a valid and reliable clinical rating scale, resulting in a total tremor score (range 0-36). Results: In New York, the total tremor score was higher in 44/406 (10.8%) controls who reported a family history of ET than in 362/406 controls with no such history (4.25 ± 2.51 vs. 3.78 ± 2.93, P = 0.02). Controls who reported a first-degree relative with ET had the highest total tremor scores. In Turkey, the total tremor score was higher in 7/89 (7.9%) controls with a family history than in 82/89 controls with no family history (3.43 ± 4.54 vs. 1.13 ± 2.54, P = 0.048). All affected relatives in Turkey were first-degree. Conclusions: These data suggest that some of the normal tremor exhibited by people in the population is likely to be subclinical, partially expressed ET and that the sphere of ET is wider than is apparent from a consideration of clinically diagnosed cases.
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Essential tremor
KW - Family history
KW - Genetics
KW - Tremor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949632895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949632895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02875.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02875.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19968704
AN - SCOPUS:77949632895
SN - 1351-5101
VL - 17
SP - 607
EP - 611
JO - European Journal of Neurology
JF - European Journal of Neurology
IS - 4
ER -