SU‐E‐T‐802: Dosimetric Examination and Verification of Megavoltage Computed Tomography (MVCT) Based IMRT Treatment Planning with Helical TomoTherapy

M. Chao, J. Huang, X. Chen, Y. Yan, Y. Xie, K. Boyd, E. Moros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning using pre‐treatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) provides a viable solution to adaptive radiotherapy. A strategy was developed to assess the impact of MVCT image quality on treatment plans using Helical TomoTherapy. Methods: The Octavius phantom (PTW) was scanned with a Philips CT‐scanner and the Helical TomoTherapy unit for kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and MVCT, respectively. MVCT images were acquired with three modes (slice thickness): coarse (6‐mm), normal (4‐mm) and fine (2‐mm). Contours from existing head‐and‐neck plans were transferred from the Pinnacle treatment planning system to phantom images and IMRT plans were generated using the TomoTherapy planning station. Comparison between the kVCT‐based plan (benchmark plan) and MVCT‐based plans were conducted to evaluate dosimetric variations. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were examined for plan quality. Plans using MVCTs acquired with three modes were also evaluated for dosimetric differences. Additional plan evaluations were performed with retrospective dose reconstruction based on the delivered leaf sequences. Results: Isodose distributions of four plans are comparable despite the intrinsic difference between MVCT and kVCT images. No significant variations on the target coverage were found from DVHs. However, plan using coarse MVCT images gave largest dose deviations (> 50%) for critical structures from that of benchmark plan while the best agreement was observed between fine MVCT and kVCT. Plan parameters were found to be consistent among four plans. Comparisons between planning doses and reconstructed treatment doses revealed high fidelity delivery. Conclusions: IMRT planning using MVCTs proved to be equivalent with that using standard kVCT when fine imaging mode was selected. Target coverage on MVCT plans is comparable to that on the standard kVCT plan. MVCT thicknesses were shown to have impact on plan quality. Caution is needed when performing treatment planning with MVCTs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy
Tomography
Benchmarking
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐802 : Dosimetric Examination and Verification of Megavoltage Computed Tomography (MVCT) Based IMRT Treatment Planning with Helical TomoTherapy. / Chao, M.; Huang, J.; Chen, X.; Yan, Y.; Xie, Y.; Boyd, K.; Moros, E.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{742371b68263470ebeaaa6f60c9693d0,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐802: Dosimetric Examination and Verification of Megavoltage Computed Tomography (MVCT) Based IMRT Treatment Planning with Helical TomoTherapy",
abstract = "Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning using pre‐treatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) provides a viable solution to adaptive radiotherapy. A strategy was developed to assess the impact of MVCT image quality on treatment plans using Helical TomoTherapy. Methods: The Octavius phantom (PTW) was scanned with a Philips CT‐scanner and the Helical TomoTherapy unit for kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and MVCT, respectively. MVCT images were acquired with three modes (slice thickness): coarse (6‐mm), normal (4‐mm) and fine (2‐mm). Contours from existing head‐and‐neck plans were transferred from the Pinnacle treatment planning system to phantom images and IMRT plans were generated using the TomoTherapy planning station. Comparison between the kVCT‐based plan (benchmark plan) and MVCT‐based plans were conducted to evaluate dosimetric variations. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were examined for plan quality. Plans using MVCTs acquired with three modes were also evaluated for dosimetric differences. Additional plan evaluations were performed with retrospective dose reconstruction based on the delivered leaf sequences. Results: Isodose distributions of four plans are comparable despite the intrinsic difference between MVCT and kVCT images. No significant variations on the target coverage were found from DVHs. However, plan using coarse MVCT images gave largest dose deviations (> 50{\%}) for critical structures from that of benchmark plan while the best agreement was observed between fine MVCT and kVCT. Plan parameters were found to be consistent among four plans. Comparisons between planning doses and reconstructed treatment doses revealed high fidelity delivery. Conclusions: IMRT planning using MVCTs proved to be equivalent with that using standard kVCT when fine imaging mode was selected. Target coverage on MVCT plans is comparable to that on the standard kVCT plan. MVCT thicknesses were shown to have impact on plan quality. Caution is needed when performing treatment planning with MVCTs.",
author = "M. Chao and J. Huang and X. Chen and Y. Yan and Y. Xie and K. Boyd and E. Moros",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1118/1.3612766",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐802

T2 - Dosimetric Examination and Verification of Megavoltage Computed Tomography (MVCT) Based IMRT Treatment Planning with Helical TomoTherapy

AU - Chao, M.

AU - Huang, J.

AU - Chen, X.

AU - Yan, Y.

AU - Xie, Y.

AU - Boyd, K.

AU - Moros, E.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning using pre‐treatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) provides a viable solution to adaptive radiotherapy. A strategy was developed to assess the impact of MVCT image quality on treatment plans using Helical TomoTherapy. Methods: The Octavius phantom (PTW) was scanned with a Philips CT‐scanner and the Helical TomoTherapy unit for kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and MVCT, respectively. MVCT images were acquired with three modes (slice thickness): coarse (6‐mm), normal (4‐mm) and fine (2‐mm). Contours from existing head‐and‐neck plans were transferred from the Pinnacle treatment planning system to phantom images and IMRT plans were generated using the TomoTherapy planning station. Comparison between the kVCT‐based plan (benchmark plan) and MVCT‐based plans were conducted to evaluate dosimetric variations. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were examined for plan quality. Plans using MVCTs acquired with three modes were also evaluated for dosimetric differences. Additional plan evaluations were performed with retrospective dose reconstruction based on the delivered leaf sequences. Results: Isodose distributions of four plans are comparable despite the intrinsic difference between MVCT and kVCT images. No significant variations on the target coverage were found from DVHs. However, plan using coarse MVCT images gave largest dose deviations (> 50%) for critical structures from that of benchmark plan while the best agreement was observed between fine MVCT and kVCT. Plan parameters were found to be consistent among four plans. Comparisons between planning doses and reconstructed treatment doses revealed high fidelity delivery. Conclusions: IMRT planning using MVCTs proved to be equivalent with that using standard kVCT when fine imaging mode was selected. Target coverage on MVCT plans is comparable to that on the standard kVCT plan. MVCT thicknesses were shown to have impact on plan quality. Caution is needed when performing treatment planning with MVCTs.

AB - Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning using pre‐treatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) provides a viable solution to adaptive radiotherapy. A strategy was developed to assess the impact of MVCT image quality on treatment plans using Helical TomoTherapy. Methods: The Octavius phantom (PTW) was scanned with a Philips CT‐scanner and the Helical TomoTherapy unit for kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and MVCT, respectively. MVCT images were acquired with three modes (slice thickness): coarse (6‐mm), normal (4‐mm) and fine (2‐mm). Contours from existing head‐and‐neck plans were transferred from the Pinnacle treatment planning system to phantom images and IMRT plans were generated using the TomoTherapy planning station. Comparison between the kVCT‐based plan (benchmark plan) and MVCT‐based plans were conducted to evaluate dosimetric variations. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were examined for plan quality. Plans using MVCTs acquired with three modes were also evaluated for dosimetric differences. Additional plan evaluations were performed with retrospective dose reconstruction based on the delivered leaf sequences. Results: Isodose distributions of four plans are comparable despite the intrinsic difference between MVCT and kVCT images. No significant variations on the target coverage were found from DVHs. However, plan using coarse MVCT images gave largest dose deviations (> 50%) for critical structures from that of benchmark plan while the best agreement was observed between fine MVCT and kVCT. Plan parameters were found to be consistent among four plans. Comparisons between planning doses and reconstructed treatment doses revealed high fidelity delivery. Conclusions: IMRT planning using MVCTs proved to be equivalent with that using standard kVCT when fine imaging mode was selected. Target coverage on MVCT plans is comparable to that on the standard kVCT plan. MVCT thicknesses were shown to have impact on plan quality. Caution is needed when performing treatment planning with MVCTs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024822654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024822654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3612766

DO - 10.1118/1.3612766

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024822654

VL - 38

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -